Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Amendola (2015)
Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants.Genome Res, 25
O’Sullivan (2018)
Prevalence and outcomes of incidental imaging findings.BMJ, 361
J. O’Sullivan, Tim Muntinga, S. Grigg, J. Ioannidis (2018)
Prevalence and outcomes of incidental imaging findings: umbrella reviewThe BMJ, 361
Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole - exome sequencing
Williams (2018)
Impact of noncardiac findings in patients undergoing CT coronary angiography.Eur Radiol, 28
P. Mueller, Facp. (2018)
Prevalence and Outcomes of Incidental Imaging FindingsNEJM Journal Watch, 2018
D. Newby, P. Adamson, C. Berry, N. Boon, M. Dweck, M. Flather, J. Forbes, Amanda Hunter, S. Lewis, S. Maclean, N. Mills, J. Norrie, G. Roditi, Anoop Shah, A. Timmis, E. Beek, M. Williams (2018)
Coronary CT Angiography and 5‐Year Risk of Myocardial InfarctionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 379
Deepak Bhatt, V. Taqueti (2017)
Out With the Old Rule-Out: Raising the Bar for Acute Chest Pain Evaluation With Randomized Trials of Cardiac Imaging.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 10 3
M. Williams, Amanda Hunter, Anoop Shah, J. Dreisbach, J. McCall, M. Macmillan, R. Kirkbride, F. Hawke, Andrew Baird, S. Mirsadraee, E. Beek, D. Newby, G. Roditi (2018)
Impact of noncardiac findings in patients undergoing CT coronary angiography: a substudy of the Scottish computed tomography of the heart (SCOT-HEART) trialEuropean Radiology, 28
Yaping Yang, D. Muzny, F. Xia, Z. Niu, R. Person, Yan Ding, P. Ward, Alicia Braxton, Min Wang, C. Buhay, N. Veeraraghavan, A. Hawes, T. Chiang, Magalie Leduc, J. Beuten, Jing Zhang, Weimin He, J. Scull, A. Willis, M. Landsverk, W. Craigen, M. Bekheirnia, A. Stray-Pedersen, Pengfei Liu, Shu Wen, W. Alcaraz, H. Cui, M. Walkiewicz, J. Reid, M. Bainbridge, Ankita Patel, E. Boerwinkle, A. Beaudet, J. Lupski, S. Plon, R. Gibbs, C. Eng (2014)
Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing.JAMA, 312 18
L. Amendola, M. Dorschner, P. Robertson, Joseph Salama, Ragan Hart, B. Shirts, Mitzi Murray, M. Tokita, Carlos Gallego, D. Kim, James Bennett, D. Crosslin, J. Ranchalis, Kelly Jones, E. Rosenthal, E.R. Jarvik, A. Itsara, Emily Turner, D. Herman, J. Schleit, A. Burt, Seema Jamal, J. Abrudan, Andrew Johnson, L. Conlin, M. Dulik, A. Santani, Danielle Metterville, M. Kelly, A. Foreman, Kristy Lee, K. Taylor, Xiuqing Guo, K. Crooks, L. Kiedrowski, L. Raffel, O. Gordon, K. Machini, R. Desnick, L. Biesecker, S. Lubitz, S. Mulchandani, G. Cooper, S. Joffe, C. Richards, Yaoping Yang, J. Rotter, S. Rich, C. O’Donnell, J. Berg, N. Spinner, J. Evans, S. Fullerton, K. Leppig, R. Bennett, T. Bird, V. Sybert, W. Grady, H. Tabor, Jerry Kim, M. Bamshad, B. Wilfond, A. Motulsky, C. Scott, C. Pritchard, T. Walsh, W. Burke, W. Raskind, P. Byers, F. Hisama, H. Rehm, D. Nickerson, G. Jarvik (2015)
Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classificationGenome Research, 25
This Viewpoint characterizes incidental radiographic findings from clinical trial–related imaging as an underrecognized potential harm of trial participation and proposes practices and standards to more systematically include them as a trial safety end point.
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Feb 18, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.