Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

LAW DEPARTMENT

LAW DEPARTMENT of the with the tumor, LAW DEPARTMENT portion colon, together large all in and then the two one together piece joined sections of the intestine. the After remaining oper¬ ation the continued have a fever for six to patient MEDICOLEGAL ABSTRACTS weeks for which a were used of treatments variety blood and drugs, transfusions, Breach of was an including drainage Malpractice: Warranty.—This After the second operations. drainage action for the defendant operation damages against psychia¬ consultants called in the were to to locate trist. From a for the defendant attempt summary judgment concluded The consultants in the trial the to the continuing difficulty. court, plaintiff appealed "that there was still a collection of somewhere United States of for the of pus court District appeals in the abdominal that It Columbia. cavity required drainage." was that two of be suggested types taken, of the the defend¬ x-rays Because plaintiff's condition, chest to determine the level of the dia¬ x-rays ant recommended the administration of a series of and instillation of to deter¬ phragm, lipiodol dye electric shock treatments. Prior to them, giving mine whether there was that a or not a tract led to contended the the defendant advised that http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

LAW DEPARTMENT

JAMA , Volume 169 (13) – Mar 28, 1959
Download PDF
1 page

LAW DEPARTMENT

Abstract

of the with the tumor, LAW DEPARTMENT portion colon, together large all in and then the two one together piece joined sections of the intestine. the After remaining oper¬ ation the continued have a fever for six to patient MEDICOLEGAL ABSTRACTS weeks for which a were used of treatments variety blood and drugs, transfusions, Breach of was an including drainage Malpractice: Warranty.—This After the second operations. drainage action for the defendant operation damages against...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/law-department-jFeoAnbC2K

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1959 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1959.03000300107025
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

of the with the tumor, LAW DEPARTMENT portion colon, together large all in and then the two one together piece joined sections of the intestine. the After remaining oper¬ ation the continued have a fever for six to patient MEDICOLEGAL ABSTRACTS weeks for which a were used of treatments variety blood and drugs, transfusions, Breach of was an including drainage Malpractice: Warranty.—This After the second operations. drainage action for the defendant operation damages against psychia¬ consultants called in the were to to locate trist. From a for the defendant attempt summary judgment concluded The consultants in the trial the to the continuing difficulty. court, plaintiff appealed "that there was still a collection of somewhere United States of for the of pus court District appeals in the abdominal that It Columbia. cavity required drainage." was that two of be suggested types taken, of the the defend¬ x-rays Because plaintiff's condition, chest to determine the level of the dia¬ x-rays ant recommended the administration of a series of and instillation of to deter¬ phragm, lipiodol dye electric shock treatments. Prior to them, giving mine whether there was that a or not a tract led to contended the the defendant advised that

Journal

JAMA – American Medical Association

Published: Mar 28, 1959

There are no references for this article.