Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Prenatal Impressions

Prenatal Impressions To the Editor: —The reason for the absence of any of the extremities or parts of a newly born infant has for a long time been a matter of speculation, and from what I have been able to read there is little definite knowledge relative to the cause of deformities. The fact remains that prenatal influence has its advocates. A recent experience has led me to favor the prenatal impression theory, and I give it to you for what it may be worth. Both parents are healthy and have had very little sickness; their ages respectively are 35 and 32 years. The presentation and delivery were normal, but the child lacked both ears, only a roughening of the skin and a pin-point concavity being present at the usual site. The inferior maxilla receded an inch and a half, missing the bite that distance. The tongue was bifid, the left portion http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png JAMA American Medical Association

Prenatal Impressions

JAMA , Volume LIX (1) – Jul 6, 1912

Prenatal Impressions

Abstract



To the Editor:
—The reason for the absence of any of the extremities or parts of a newly born infant has for a long time been a matter of speculation, and from what I have been able to read there is little definite knowledge relative to the cause of deformities. The fact remains that prenatal influence has its advocates.
A recent experience has led me to favor the prenatal impression theory, and I give it to you for what it may be worth.
Both parents are healthy and have had very...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/prenatal-impressions-9HN0OUfRfv

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1912 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
ISSN
0098-7484
eISSN
1538-3598
DOI
10.1001/jama.1912.04270070054024
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To the Editor: —The reason for the absence of any of the extremities or parts of a newly born infant has for a long time been a matter of speculation, and from what I have been able to read there is little definite knowledge relative to the cause of deformities. The fact remains that prenatal influence has its advocates. A recent experience has led me to favor the prenatal impression theory, and I give it to you for what it may be worth. Both parents are healthy and have had very little sickness; their ages respectively are 35 and 32 years. The presentation and delivery were normal, but the child lacked both ears, only a roughening of the skin and a pin-point concavity being present at the usual site. The inferior maxilla receded an inch and a half, missing the bite that distance. The tongue was bifid, the left portion

Journal

JAMAAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jul 6, 1912

There are no references for this article.