Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Reported by Dr. H. I. Raymond.] There is a two-fold interest in the subject-matter of monsters. First, as it presents itself to the mind of the practical obstetrician; and second, as it calls into exercise the subtle reasonings of the speculative physiologist. The simple scientific investigation of the subject may in the end yield as practical results as the investigation of the matter for purely clinical purposes, inasmuch as the scientific teratologist may some day afford some rational clue to the semiology of monster formation, and the physiologist be enabled to suggest much looking toward the prevention of psychical impressions likely to modify the normal processes of nutrition and growth. The clinical features of this subject-matter will be best brought out by simply relating the history of the present case. The size of patient's abdomen was enormous, so much so as to excite in her own mind an apprehension of
JAMA – American Medical Association
Published: Jan 26, 1884
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.