Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

MULTIPLE BILATERAL BONE AND CALLUS FEMURS AND LEFT TRAUMATIC PAROSTEAL FORMATIONS OF THE INNOMINATE BONE: REPORT OF CASE

MULTIPLE BILATERAL BONE AND CALLUS FEMURS AND LEFT TRAUMATIC PAROSTEAL FORMATIONS OF THE... Abstract The development of parosteal bone within muscle following trauma has become an important and interesting surgical problem since the advent of the roentgen ray, which has made more certain the diagnosis of the condition, and the increasing incidence of injuries due to occupation. The intense interest in this condition resulted from the increasing demands made by accident insurance companies upon the surgeon for a more definite prognosis following injury to muscle and bone, because of the workmen's compensation law. Josephson,1 in 1874, made the first collection from the literature of fifty-eight cases of what he called muscular osteomas, and Cahier,2 in 1904, gathered 133 cases. Schulz,3 1903, gathered 296 and, in 1912, Jones and Morgan4 collected 339 cases. During the last decade the recorded cases have numbered in the thousands. All the theories of traumatic bone formation in muscle include the factor of initial injury. In References 1. Josephson, A.: Deutsch. mil. Ztschr. 2:156-161, 1874. 2. Cahier, L.: Rev. de chir. 29:356-367, 1904. 3. Schulz, O.: Deutsch. mil. Ztschr. 36:339-348, 1903. 4. Jones, Robert, and Morgan, David: Arch. Roentg. Rays 9:245-249, 1905 5. Jones Arch. Roentg. Rays 10:99-100, 1906. 6. Berthier, A.: Arch. de méd. expér. et d'anat. path. 6:601-620, 1894. 7. Seydeler, R.: Deutsch. mil. Ztschr. 8:33-48, 1879. 8. Bard, L.: Manual d'anatomie, 1891, p. 317. 9. Graf, E.: Die konigliche Reserve Lazarethe zu Düsseldorf wahrend des Kriegen, Elberfeld, 1872, p. 64. 10. Berndt, F.: Arch. f. klin. Chir. 65:235, 1902. 11. Macewen, W.: The Growth of Bone, 1912, p. 33. 12. Ewald, P.: Zentralbl. f. Chir. 37:771, 1911. 13. Orth, J.: Berl. klin. Wchnschr. 43:430, 1906. 14. Frangenheim, P.: Arch. f. klin. Chir. 80:445-450, 1905. 15. König, F.: Arch. f. klin. Chir. 80:64-80, 1906. 16. Painter, C. F.: Boston M. & S. J. 185:45 ( (July 14) ) 1921. 17. Marshall, H. W.: Boston M. & S. J. 184:380 ( (April 14) ) 1921. 18. Josephson, Cahier, Schulz, Jones and Morgan, Macewen, Painter and Fay ( Surg., Gynec. & Obst. 19:174-190, 1914) 19. Fay, O. J., Footnote 17, p. 186. 20. Machol, A.: Beitr. z. klin. Chir. 56:775, 1908. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Surgery American Medical Association

MULTIPLE BILATERAL BONE AND CALLUS FEMURS AND LEFT TRAUMATIC PAROSTEAL FORMATIONS OF THE INNOMINATE BONE: REPORT OF CASE

CAREY, EBEN J.
Archives of Surgery , Volume 8 (2) – Mar 1, 1924
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/multiple-bilateral-bone-and-callus-femurs-and-left-traumatic-parosteal-0CrUz1mnAN

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1924 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0004-0010
eISSN
1538-3644
DOI
10.1001/archsurg.1924.01120050133007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The development of parosteal bone within muscle following trauma has become an important and interesting surgical problem since the advent of the roentgen ray, which has made more certain the diagnosis of the condition, and the increasing incidence of injuries due to occupation. The intense interest in this condition resulted from the increasing demands made by accident insurance companies upon the surgeon for a more definite prognosis following injury to muscle and bone, because of the workmen's compensation law. Josephson,1 in 1874, made the first collection from the literature of fifty-eight cases of what he called muscular osteomas, and Cahier,2 in 1904, gathered 133 cases. Schulz,3 1903, gathered 296 and, in 1912, Jones and Morgan4 collected 339 cases. During the last decade the recorded cases have numbered in the thousands. All the theories of traumatic bone formation in muscle include the factor of initial injury. In References 1. Josephson, A.: Deutsch. mil. Ztschr. 2:156-161, 1874. 2. Cahier, L.: Rev. de chir. 29:356-367, 1904. 3. Schulz, O.: Deutsch. mil. Ztschr. 36:339-348, 1903. 4. Jones, Robert, and Morgan, David: Arch. Roentg. Rays 9:245-249, 1905 5. Jones Arch. Roentg. Rays 10:99-100, 1906. 6. Berthier, A.: Arch. de méd. expér. et d'anat. path. 6:601-620, 1894. 7. Seydeler, R.: Deutsch. mil. Ztschr. 8:33-48, 1879. 8. Bard, L.: Manual d'anatomie, 1891, p. 317. 9. Graf, E.: Die konigliche Reserve Lazarethe zu Düsseldorf wahrend des Kriegen, Elberfeld, 1872, p. 64. 10. Berndt, F.: Arch. f. klin. Chir. 65:235, 1902. 11. Macewen, W.: The Growth of Bone, 1912, p. 33. 12. Ewald, P.: Zentralbl. f. Chir. 37:771, 1911. 13. Orth, J.: Berl. klin. Wchnschr. 43:430, 1906. 14. Frangenheim, P.: Arch. f. klin. Chir. 80:445-450, 1905. 15. König, F.: Arch. f. klin. Chir. 80:64-80, 1906. 16. Painter, C. F.: Boston M. & S. J. 185:45 ( (July 14) ) 1921. 17. Marshall, H. W.: Boston M. & S. J. 184:380 ( (April 14) ) 1921. 18. Josephson, Cahier, Schulz, Jones and Morgan, Macewen, Painter and Fay ( Surg., Gynec. & Obst. 19:174-190, 1914) 19. Fay, O. J., Footnote 17, p. 186. 20. Machol, A.: Beitr. z. klin. Chir. 56:775, 1908.

Journal

Archives of Surgery – American Medical Association

Published: Mar 1, 1924

There are no references for this article.