Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
SJ Senn (2002)
Power is indeed irrelevant in interpreting completed studies [letter]., 325
E. Ziegel (2002)
Generalized Linear ModelsTechnometrics, 44
S. Greenland, M. Maclure, J. Schlesselman, C. Poole, H. Morgenstern (1991)
Standardized regression coefficients: a further critique and review of some alternatives.Epidemiology, 2 5
N. Breslow, N. Day (1987)
The design and analysis of cohort studies
M. Chipman (2001)
Injury Control: A Guide to Research and Program EvaluationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 154
W. Gardner, E. Mulvey, Esther Shaw (1995)
Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models.Psychological bulletin, 118 3
S. Greenland, J. Schlesselman, M. Criqui (1986)
The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect.American journal of epidemiology, 123 2
J. Calvin (1998)
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent VariablesTechnometrics, 40
M. Zwarenstein, D. Horrobin, D. Altman, D. Moher, K. Schulz, P. Bacchetti, G. Barton, M. Fox (2002)
Peer review of statistics in medical research [2] (multiple letters)BMJ, 325
L. Lin (1989)
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.Biometrics, 45 1
S. Greenland (1987)
Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses.American journal of epidemiology, 125 5
David Hapeman (1999)
Statistical Analysis of Categorical DataTechnometrics, 42
M. Siddiqui (1995)
Insurance and the risk of ruptured appendix.The New England journal of medicine, 332 6
M. Gardner, D. Altman (1986)
Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), 292
C. Poole (2001)
Low P-Values or Narrow Confidence Intervals: Which Are More Durable?Epidemiology, 12
S. Greenland, H. Morgenstern (2001)
Confounding in health research.Annual review of public health, 22
J. Brewer (1988)
Statistical Rules-of-Thumb., 30
D. Altman, Jonathon Deeks, D. Sackett (1998)
Odds ratios should be avoided when events are commonBMJ, 317
D. Savitz (1993)
Is statistical significance testing useful in interpreting data?Reproductive toxicology, 7 2
LA McNutt, JP Hafner, X Xue (1999)
Correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes [letter]., 282
D. Sackett, J. Deeks, D. Altman (1996)
Down with odds ratios!Evidence Based Medicine, 1
KJ Rothman, S Greenland
Modern Epidemiology.
J. Nelder (2001)
Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends by Douglas G. Altman, Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19: 3275–3289Statistics in Medicine, 20
V. Vieland, S. Hodge (1998)
Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood ParadigmAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 63
Matthias Schroder (2003)
Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning TextTechnometrics, 45
B. Macmahon, T. Pugh (1970)
Epidemiology: Principles and Methods
D. Altman (1990)
Practical statistics for medical research
Diane Tsai (1988)
Methods in Observational EpidemiologyThe Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 61
P. Cummings, R. Norton, Thomas Koepsel (2000)
Injury Control: Rates, Rate Denominators, and Rate Comparisons
JA Nelder (2001)
Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends [letter]., 20
C. Gouriéroux, A. Monfort, A. Trognon (1984)
Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods: Applications to Poisson ModelsEconometrica, 52
L. McNutt, J. Hafner, X. Xue (1999)
Correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.JAMA, 282 6
A. Alatri, P. Bucciarelli, M. Moia (1999)
Subcutaneous Heparin for Deep Venous ThrombosisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 130
K. Rothman (1986)
Significance questing.Annals of internal medicine, 105 3
Jeffrey Woodbridge (2002)
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
K. Rothman (1990)
Statistics in nonrandomized studies.Epidemiology, 1 6
(2003)
American Medical Association. All rights reserved
JM Bland, DG Altman (1996)
Measurement error., 313
D Altman, J Deeks, D Sackett (1998)
Odds ratios revisited [letter]., 3
J. Deeks (2002)
Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 21
T. Steichen, N. Cox (2002)
A Note on the Concordance Correlation CoefficientThe Stata Journal, 2
R. Mickey, S. Greenland (1989)
The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.American journal of epidemiology, 129 1
APR 2003 WWW.ARCHPEDIATRICS.COM 323
A. Walker (1986)
Reporting the results of epidemiologic studies.American journal of public health, 76 5
J. Hardin, Joseph Hilbe (2001)
Generalized Linear Models and Extensions
Lisa Schwartz, S. Woloshin, Welch Hg (1999)
Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians' referrals for cardiac catheterization.The New England journal of medicine, 341 4
(2002)
Author ’ s thoughts on power calculations [ letter ]
J. Higginson (1968)
International Agency for Research on Cancer.WHO chronicle, 22 12
C. Gouriéroux, A. Monfort, A. Trognon (1984)
PSEUDO MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHODS: THEORYEconometrica, 52
S. Goodman, J. Berlin (1994)
The Use of Predicted Confidence Intervals When Planning Experiments and the Misuse of Power When Interpreting ResultsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 121
Jason Liao, J. Lewis (2000)
A note on concordance correlation coefficient.PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology, 54 1
Clarice Weinberg (2001)
It's time to rehabilitate the P-value.Epidemiology, 12 3
J. Bland, Douglas Altman (1986)
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 327
Allan Smith, M. Bates (1992)
Confidence limit analyses should replace power calculations in the interpretation of epidemiologic studies.Epidemiology, 3 5
(1998)
Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott- Raven
P Cummings, R Norton, TD Koepsell
Rates, rate denominators, and rate comparisons.
J. Matthews (2000)
An introduction to randomized controlled clinical trials
J. Lang, K. Rothman, C. Cann (1998)
That confounded P-value.Epidemiology, 9 1
H. Kraemer, V. Periyakoil, A. Noda (2002)
Kappa coefficients in medical researchStatistics in Medicine, 21
A. Relman (1994)
Medical insurance and health. What about managed care?The New England journal of medicine, 331 7
Jun Zhang, K. Yu (1998)
What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.JAMA, 280 19
J. Nelder (2001)
Statistics in medical journals: some recent trends.Statistics in medicine, 20 14
SN Goodman (1999)
Toward evidence-based medical statistics, 2: the Bayes factor., 130
S. Senn (2002)
Power is indeed irrelevant in interpreting completed studiesBMJ : British Medical Journal, 325
J. Fleiss (1973)
Statistical methods for rates and proportions
P. Trivedi (1998)
Regression Analysis of Count Data
J. Nelson, M. Pepe (2000)
Statistical description of interrater variability in ordinal ratingsStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 9
S. Goodman (1999)
Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value FallacyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 130
D. Hosmer, N. Hjort (2002)
Goodness‐of‐fit processes for logistic regression: simulation resultsStatistics in Medicine, 21
S. Wacholder (1986)
Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences.American journal of epidemiology, 123 1
L. Colaianni (1991)
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical JournalsAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry, 28
DG Altman, MJ Bland (1995)
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence., 311
B. Shaw (1995)
The value of P.Liver transplantation and surgery : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 1 5
P Armitage, G Berry, JNS Matthews
Statistical Methods in Medical Research.
G. Maldonado, S. Greenland (1993)
Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies.American journal of epidemiology, 138 11
S. Senn (1998)
Odds ratios revisited
DG Altman, JJ Deeks, DL Sackett (1998)
Odds ratios should be avoided when events are common [letter]., 317
EDITORIAL Reporting Statistical Information in Medical Journal Articles TATISTICS IS not merely about distributions Much regression output serves little purpose in medi- or probabilities, although these are part of cal research publication; this usually includes the inter- the discipline. In the broadest sense, statis- cept coefficient, R , log likelihood, standard errors, and tics is the use of numbers to quantify rela- P values. Estimates of variance explained (such as R , cor- S tionships in data and thereby answer ques- relation coefficients, and standardized regression coef- tions. Statistical methods allow the researcher to reduce ficients (sometimes called effect size) are not useful mea- a spreadsheet of data to counts, means, proportions, rates, sures of causal associations or agreement and should not 9-12 risk ratios, rate differences, and other quantities that con- be presented as the main results of an analysis. These vey information. We believe that the presentation of nu- measures depend not only on the size of any biological merical information will be enhanced if authors keep in effect of an exposure, but also on the distribution of the mind that their goal is to clarify and explain. We offer exposure in the population. Because this distribution
JAMA Pediatrics – American Medical Association
Published: Apr 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.