Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Neurotologic Approach to Acoustic Neuromas: 'What's in a Name?'

The Neurotologic Approach to Acoustic Neuromas: 'What's in a Name?' This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract To the Editor.—We have a growing concern that a number of otolaryngologists (even some trained in neurotology) are turning toward the upright suboccipital approach for removal of the acoustic neuroma. Prestigious university centers or large privately endowed clinics are no exception. While it can be argued that "flexibility," "hearing preservation," and "neurosurgical cooperation" are reasonable considerations, it really comes down to one thing: the willingness of a concerned otolaryngologist to learn the best and most appropriate approach for the patient's well-being. While it can be argued that large tumors are anyone's game, it has been our experience that the translabyrinthine approach or the middle fossa approach are far safer than the upright suboccipital approach. Both of us have had experience in both techniques. The members of our specialty must be careful to observe the so-called neurotologic team. "What is in a name: 'Neurotology'?" It is really that the neurosurgeon http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Otolaryngology American Medical Association

The Neurotologic Approach to Acoustic Neuromas: 'What's in a Name?'

The Neurotologic Approach to Acoustic Neuromas: 'What's in a Name?'

Abstract

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract To the Editor.—We have a growing concern that a number of otolaryngologists (even some trained in neurotology) are turning toward the upright suboccipital approach for removal of the acoustic neuroma. Prestigious university centers or large privately endowed clinics are no exception. While it can be argued that "flexibility,"...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/the-neurotologic-approach-to-acoustic-neuromas-what-s-in-a-name-nXplypW6LF

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0003-9977
DOI
10.1001/archotol.1983.00800180073018
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract To the Editor.—We have a growing concern that a number of otolaryngologists (even some trained in neurotology) are turning toward the upright suboccipital approach for removal of the acoustic neuroma. Prestigious university centers or large privately endowed clinics are no exception. While it can be argued that "flexibility," "hearing preservation," and "neurosurgical cooperation" are reasonable considerations, it really comes down to one thing: the willingness of a concerned otolaryngologist to learn the best and most appropriate approach for the patient's well-being. While it can be argued that large tumors are anyone's game, it has been our experience that the translabyrinthine approach or the middle fossa approach are far safer than the upright suboccipital approach. Both of us have had experience in both techniques. The members of our specialty must be careful to observe the so-called neurotologic team. "What is in a name: 'Neurotology'?" It is really that the neurosurgeon

Journal

Archives of OtolaryngologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Apr 1, 1983

There are no references for this article.