Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evoked Response to Intensity and Frequency Change

Evoked Response to Intensity and Frequency Change Abstract Amplitude of the averaged electroencephalic response (AER) to intensity and frequency change was compared to behavioral performance in two subjects: one with normal hearing, the other with sensorineural hearing loss. Behavioral differences in both intensity and frequency resolution were paralleled in the AER amplitude. References 1. Davis H, Hirsh SK, Shelnutt J: Further validation of evoked response audiometry (ERA) . J Speech Hearing Res 10:717-732, 1967. 2. Best LG, Tabor JR: Cortical audiometry as an otologic procedure . Trans Amer Acad Ophthal Otolaryng 72:142-152, 1968. 3. Shimizu H: Evoked response in VIII nerve lesions . Trans Amer Acad Ophthal Otolaryng 72:596-603, 1968. 4. Knight JJ, Beagley HA: Auditory evoked response and loudness function . Int Audiology 8:382-386, 1969.Crossref 5. Jerger J: Differential intensity sensitivity in the ear with loudness recruitment . J Speech Hearing Res 20:183-191, 1955. 6. Meurmann OH: The difference limen of frequency in tests of auditory function . Acta Otolaryng 118( (suppl) ):144-155, 1954.Crossref 7. Butler R, Albrite J: The pitch discrimination function of the pathologic ear . Arch Otolaryng 63:411-418, 1956.Crossref 8. Stevens SS, Morgan CT, Volkmann J: Theory of the neural quantum in the discrimination of loudness and pitch . Amer J Psychol 54:315-335, 1941.Crossref 9. Davis H: Enhancement of evoked cortical potentials in humans related to task requiring a decision . Science 145:182-183, 1964.Crossref 10. Garcia-Austt E, Bogacz J, Vanzulli A: Effects of attention and inattention upon visual evoked responses . Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 17:136-143, 1964.Crossref 11. Gross MM, Begleiter H, Tobin M, et al: Auditory evoked response comparison during counting clicks and reading . Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 18:451-454, 1965.Crossref 12. Shevrin H, Rennick P: Cortical response to a tactile stimulus during attention, mental arithmetic and free associations . Psychophysiology 3:381-388, 1966.Crossref 13. Spoor A, Timmer F, Odenthal DW: The evoked auditory response (EAR) to intensity modulated and frequency modulated tones and tone bursts . Int Audiology 8:410-415, 1969.Crossref 14. Haider M, Spong P, Lindsley DB: Attention, vigilance, and cortical evoked-potentials in humans . Science 145:180-182, 1964.Crossref http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Otolaryngology American Medical Association

Evoked Response to Intensity and Frequency Change

Archives of Otolaryngology , Volume 91 (5) – May 1, 1970

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/evoked-response-to-intensity-and-frequency-change-8y8vV2SM0j

References (15)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0003-9977
DOI
10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040627007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Amplitude of the averaged electroencephalic response (AER) to intensity and frequency change was compared to behavioral performance in two subjects: one with normal hearing, the other with sensorineural hearing loss. Behavioral differences in both intensity and frequency resolution were paralleled in the AER amplitude. References 1. Davis H, Hirsh SK, Shelnutt J: Further validation of evoked response audiometry (ERA) . J Speech Hearing Res 10:717-732, 1967. 2. Best LG, Tabor JR: Cortical audiometry as an otologic procedure . Trans Amer Acad Ophthal Otolaryng 72:142-152, 1968. 3. Shimizu H: Evoked response in VIII nerve lesions . Trans Amer Acad Ophthal Otolaryng 72:596-603, 1968. 4. Knight JJ, Beagley HA: Auditory evoked response and loudness function . Int Audiology 8:382-386, 1969.Crossref 5. Jerger J: Differential intensity sensitivity in the ear with loudness recruitment . J Speech Hearing Res 20:183-191, 1955. 6. Meurmann OH: The difference limen of frequency in tests of auditory function . Acta Otolaryng 118( (suppl) ):144-155, 1954.Crossref 7. Butler R, Albrite J: The pitch discrimination function of the pathologic ear . Arch Otolaryng 63:411-418, 1956.Crossref 8. Stevens SS, Morgan CT, Volkmann J: Theory of the neural quantum in the discrimination of loudness and pitch . Amer J Psychol 54:315-335, 1941.Crossref 9. Davis H: Enhancement of evoked cortical potentials in humans related to task requiring a decision . Science 145:182-183, 1964.Crossref 10. Garcia-Austt E, Bogacz J, Vanzulli A: Effects of attention and inattention upon visual evoked responses . Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 17:136-143, 1964.Crossref 11. Gross MM, Begleiter H, Tobin M, et al: Auditory evoked response comparison during counting clicks and reading . Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 18:451-454, 1965.Crossref 12. Shevrin H, Rennick P: Cortical response to a tactile stimulus during attention, mental arithmetic and free associations . Psychophysiology 3:381-388, 1966.Crossref 13. Spoor A, Timmer F, Odenthal DW: The evoked auditory response (EAR) to intensity modulated and frequency modulated tones and tone bursts . Int Audiology 8:410-415, 1969.Crossref 14. Haider M, Spong P, Lindsley DB: Attention, vigilance, and cortical evoked-potentials in humans . Science 145:180-182, 1964.Crossref

Journal

Archives of OtolaryngologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: May 1, 1970

There are no references for this article.