Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

MICROSURGERY OF THE EYE: THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE

MICROSURGERY OF THE EYE: THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE Abstract To the Editor: In July of last year, there appeared in this journal an editorial entitled: "A Forward Look at Ophthalmic Surgery."1I could hardly agree more with the views expressed therein; as a matter of fact I said practically the same in an article eight years ago, in this very journal.2 That the Editor thought it expedient to stress again the necessity of using the binocular microscope in eye surgery is a sorry proof that in all those years not much headway has been made. In his article, he laid most of the blame at the manufacturers' doorstep, and this is the only point on which I do not quite agree with him. Let us not forget that it took the slitlamp 40 years to attain its present form, and that only because there was a constant stream of suggestions for improvements and additions from ophthalmologists the References 1. Editorial , Arch Ophthal 70:46, 1963. 2. Dekking, H. M.: Use of Binocular Microscope in Eye Operations , AMA Arch Ophthal 55:114, 1956.Crossref 3. Dekking, H. M.: Sterilization of Ophthalmic Instruments by Ethylene Oxide , Ophthalmologica 145:438, 1963.Crossref 4. On request, the firm of Lode Instruments, Oosterstraat 38, Groningen, Netherlands, will undertake the construction of the microscope stand described here, either with a bare supporting rod for mounting the Zeiss Otoscope or with lighting equipment for the Olympus Zoom microscope. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archives of Ophthalmology American Medical Association

MICROSURGERY OF THE EYE: THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE

Archives of Ophthalmology , Volume 71 (6) – Jun 1, 1964

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-medical-association/microsurgery-of-the-eye-the-present-and-the-future-n61CX6c02F

References (3)

Publisher
American Medical Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN
0003-9950
eISSN
1538-3687
DOI
10.1001/archopht.1964.00970010897022
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract To the Editor: In July of last year, there appeared in this journal an editorial entitled: "A Forward Look at Ophthalmic Surgery."1I could hardly agree more with the views expressed therein; as a matter of fact I said practically the same in an article eight years ago, in this very journal.2 That the Editor thought it expedient to stress again the necessity of using the binocular microscope in eye surgery is a sorry proof that in all those years not much headway has been made. In his article, he laid most of the blame at the manufacturers' doorstep, and this is the only point on which I do not quite agree with him. Let us not forget that it took the slitlamp 40 years to attain its present form, and that only because there was a constant stream of suggestions for improvements and additions from ophthalmologists the References 1. Editorial , Arch Ophthal 70:46, 1963. 2. Dekking, H. M.: Use of Binocular Microscope in Eye Operations , AMA Arch Ophthal 55:114, 1956.Crossref 3. Dekking, H. M.: Sterilization of Ophthalmic Instruments by Ethylene Oxide , Ophthalmologica 145:438, 1963.Crossref 4. On request, the firm of Lode Instruments, Oosterstraat 38, Groningen, Netherlands, will undertake the construction of the microscope stand described here, either with a bare supporting rod for mounting the Zeiss Otoscope or with lighting equipment for the Olympus Zoom microscope.

Journal

Archives of OphthalmologyAmerican Medical Association

Published: Jun 1, 1964

There are no references for this article.