Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. B. Reese (1951)
Retrolental FibroplasiaAm. J. Ophth., 34
H. G. Scheie , G. S. Tyner, J. A. Buessler (1951)
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) and Cortisone in OphthalmologyA. M. A. Arch. Ophth., 45
P. Heath (1950)
Retrolental fibroplasia as a syndrome pathogenesis and classifications.Archives of ophthalmology, 44 2
Abstract FEW REPORTS of the pathologic changes in early cases of retrolental fibroplasia have appeared in the literature. Heath,1 in 1950, classified retrolental fibroplasia as a syndrome and described the pathologic findings in the early and later stages of retrolental fibroplasia in premature infants. He described the primary disease as "an edematous, hemorrhagic and proliferative process associated with hamartomatous neovascular tissue in the retina, a process best described as a retinopathy of premature birth." Heath defined "hamartoma" as an accumulation of vascular tissue, normal in location but excessive in amount, and without the property of malignant growth. Reese,2 in 1951, described the autopsy observations in a case of early retrolental fibroplasia. Sections of these eyes showed "angiomatous tissue extending from the retina into the vitreous, particularly in the periphery around the base of the vitreous." Reese stated that the outstanding feature is the angioplastic process in the vitreous and References 1. Heath, P.: Retrolental Fibroplasia as a Syndrome: Pathogenesis and Classifications , Arch. Ophth. 44:245-274 ( (Aug.) ) 1950.Crossref 2. Reese, A. B., and Blodi, F. C.: Retrolental Fibroplasia , Am. J. Ophth. 34:1-24 ( (Jan.) ) 1951. 3. Friedenwald, J. S.; Owens, W. C., and Owens, E. U.: Read at the Eighty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Ophthalmological Society, June 7-9, 1951, White Sulphur Springs, W. Va., to be published. 4. Scheie, H. G.; Tyner, G. S.; Buessler, J. A., and Alfano, J. E.: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) and Cortisone in Ophthalmology , A. M. A. Arch. Ophth. 45:301-316 ( (March) ) 1951.Crossref 5. The findings were similar in the two eyes. Figures 1 to 6, from sections of the left eye, were used because the photographs were the clearest. Figures 7 and 8 are of the right eye.
A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmology – American Medical Association
Published: Dec 1, 1951
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.