Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract Having been interested in ophthalmologic education and the training of ophthalmologists for twenty-two years, it is my hope that the article by Dr. Cogan will act as a stimulus to better teaching. While I am in general agreement with the ideas expressed in this paper, I believe that a few points will bear discussion. It is well known that many clinicians have an inadequate knowledge of the basic sciences as applied to ophthalmology, having obtained their training by preceptorships or in an institution where only clinical practice is taught. Any courses in the basic sciences added to such teaching are of inestimable value. For many years studies in the basic sciences have been an important part of the four year period of training in ophthalmology at the State University of Iowa College of Medicine. It has been felt that one not grounded in such subjects cannot be a good clinician.
Archives of Ophthalmology – American Medical Association
Published: Apr 1, 1947
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.