Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract There seem to be three major reasons for writing histories of medicine: (1) to "prove a point," eg, that doctors are immoral, medicine in the 20th century is a gift of the gods, and medicine as it exists in modern times is blasphemous; (2) to reveal, through examination of original documents and sources, a fascinating variation of approaches to medical care in human history, which should be studied in their own right for practical and artistic reasons; and (3) to show that the history of medicine is chock-full of mystery, curiosa, and bits and pieces that remind a perceptive reader of the best in detective fiction (well illustrated in the writings of Berton Roueche). Klawans' 13 essays in TheMedicine of History fall somewhere between the second and third reasons, with the apparent enthusiasm for the quirkiness of medical men putting them more firmly in the latter. The collection is
Archives of Neurology – American Medical Association
Published: Oct 1, 1983
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.