Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Abstract Every now and then someone comes along to disturb the placid pool of orthodoxy. Nothing is more fascinating than to see the animals first take cover and then come charging out snarling or flapping their wings, fluttering around the status quo, and attacking all upsetting minority opinions. It does the spirit good to see an occasional person cast upon traditional views a light and doubt at the same time. It seems unlikely that any field of inquiry in clinical medicine has been more attacked and besieged in the last decade than hypertension. The question at once comes up, "What have we got for all our efforts?" Pickering's astonishing proposal is that essential hypertension is not so much a disease as the unlucky far end of a distribution curve of biological experience. This at once puts us up against the question, "What is disease?" I need not rehearse here the long,
Archives of Internal Medicine – American Medical Association
Published: Jan 1, 1963
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.