Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables. Abstract A Case for Diagnosis. Presented by Dr. Senear. A Jewess, aged 41, who had had an active stomatitis of severe degree which had been present for a year, one week before presentation developed dermatitis about the forearms, face, back and legs. She had received treatment with tampons of glycerin and iodin, and some simple mixture had been prescribed by the department of internal medicine at the Illinois Medical School. There was a questionable history of her having received bromid at one time.The lesions were bullous, with a scanty purulent discharge when the patient was first seen a few days previously. A weak ammoniated ointment had almost cleared up the pyogenic element. DISCUSSION Dr. Eisenstaedt said he thought the lesions suggested a bromid eruption rather than any other type of eruption.Dr. McEwen said he was inclined to lean toward a diagnosis of a drug eruption, and he thought it
Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology – American Medical Association
Published: Jun 1, 1924
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.