Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blocks in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer–Related Pain: A Case SeriesPena, Israel; Knoepfler, Matthew L.; Irwin, Anna; Zhu, Xiaoying; Kohan, Lynn R.
doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001106pmid: 31609721
Head and neck cancer can be painful, debilitating, and refractory to oral medications. Due to the association of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) with maxillary nerve sensory fibers, SPG blocks may be used to treat the pain of the hard and soft palate, tonsils, nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, oral gingiva, premaxillary soft tissue, maxilla, and orbital floor. We present the first case series of performing SPG blocks utilizing TX360 nasal atomizers or angiocatheters to treat head and neck cancer–related pain. Pain scores were reduced by 38% to 80% with an average pain relief duration of 23 days.
Use of Virtual Reality as a Surrogate for Parental Presence During Anesthetic Induction: A Case ReportGupta, Abhinav; Joseph Thomas, James
doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001114pmid: 31703005
Virtual reality (VR), a computer-generated simulation of a 3-dimensional environment, is a relatively new method of providing distraction before and during procedures. We describe the use of a VR multiuser application, Oculus Rooms, to calm an anxious 10-year-old boy during transportation to the operating room and induction of anesthesia. The use of VR could lessen the perioperative anxiety of children by maintaining a virtual child-parent connection while avoiding the potential drawbacks to having parents actually in the operating room before and during induction of anesthesia. The success of this novel technique has important implications for future clinical trials and practice.
Bradycardic Arrest During Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring: A Case ReportMorano, Jacqueline M.; Tung, Avery
doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000001123pmid: 31688027
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring involves electrical stimulation of nerve pathways and is used to assess the integrity of both motor and sensory pathways. Whereas motor pathway monitoring involves transcranial stimulation and peripheral nerve monitoring, somatosensory monitoring involves peripheral nerve stimulation and cranial monitoring. Arrhythmias are a known complication of motor-evoked potential monitoring but have not been reported with somatosensory monitoring. We describe a case of bradycardic arrest with somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring using median nerve electrodes in a patient with no previous rhythm abnormality. Clinicians caring for patients receiving somatosensory monitoring should be aware of the potential for severe arrhythmias.