Home

Footer

DeepDyve Logo
FacebookTwitter

Features

  • Search and discover articles on DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar
  • Read the full-text of open access and premium content
  • Organize articles with folders and bookmarks
  • Collaborate on and share articles and folders

Info

  • Pricing
  • Enterprise Plans
  • Browse Journals & Topics
  • About DeepDyve

Help

  • Help
  • Publishers
  • Contact Us

Popular Topics

  • COVID-19
  • Climate Change
  • Biopharmaceuticals
Terms |
Privacy |
Security |
Help |
Enterprise Plans |
Contact Us

Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2023 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

International Journal on Disability and Human Development

Subject:
Speech and Hearing
Publisher:
De Gruyter —
de Gruyter
ISSN:
2191-0367
Scimago Journal Rank:
26

2017

Volume 16
Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Feb)

2016

Volume 16
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 2 (Jun)
Volume 15
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Feb)

2015

Volume 14
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

2014

Volume 13
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 1 (Feb)

2013

Volume 12
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Feb)

2012

Volume 11
Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Mar)

2011

Volume 10
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Mar)

2010

Volume 9
NovemberIssue 4 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)

2009

Volume 8
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

2008

Volume 7
Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

2007

Volume 6
Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

2006

Volume 5
Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

2005

Volume 4
Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

2003

Volume 3
October

2002

Volume 3
Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

2001

Volume 2
Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

2000

Volume 1
Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)

1999

Volume 1
Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)
journal article
LitStream Collection
Evaluation of a community-based positive youth development program in Hong Kong: views of program implementers

Shek, Daniel T.L.; Ma, Cecilia M.S.; Zhu, Xiaoqin

2017 International Journal on Disability and Human Development

doi: 10.1515/ijdhd-2017-7006

AbstractUsing a subjective outcome evaluation method, the current study investigated program implementers’ perceptions of the Tier 1 Program of the community-based P.A.T.H.S. Project in Hong Kong. After completion of the program, 599 program implementers completed a valid and reliable scale (i.e. Form B) to give their ratings on program content, their own performance, and perceived program effectiveness. As expected, most program implementers perceived the program in a favorable way by giving very positive ratings on the three aspects measured in Form B. Grade differences on the ratings were observed, with implementers teaching the senior curriculum held more positive views on program effectiveness than did those teaching the junior curriculum. Similar to previous findings, perceived program content and perceived worker performance predicted program effectiveness. Findings of the present study provide further evidence for the success of the Tier 1 Program of the community-based P.A.T.H.S. Project in Hong Kong.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Evaluation of a community-based positive youth development program for adolescents with greater psychosocial needs: views of the program participants

Shek, Daniel T.L.; Ma, Cecilia M.S.; Law, Moon Y.M.; Zhao, Zoe

2017 International Journal on Disability and Human Development

doi: 10.1515/ijdhd-2017-7007

AbstractThe present study attempted to investigate the perceptions of Chinese secondary school students with greater psychosocial needs of the Tier 2 Program in the community-based phase of P.A.T.H.S. Project in Hong Kong (n=4245). Using a subjective outcome evaluation tool (Form C), the results revealed that a great majority of the students held positive attitudes toward the program, implementers and the effectiveness of the program. Also, the three domains of the program (“program quality”, “implementer quality” and “program effectiveness”) were significantly associated with each other. In line with previous findings, both program content and program implementer quality were significant predictors of program effectiveness. The current findings further reinforce the thesis that the community-based Tier 2 programs of the P.A.T.H.S. Project are effective in promoting the holistic development of adolescents with greater psychosocial needs in Hong Kong.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Subjective outcome evaluation of the community-based P.A.T.H.S Project: views of program implementers

Shek, Daniel T.L.; Leung, Janet T.Y.; Ma, Cecilia M.S.; Wu, Jing

2017 International Journal on Disability and Human Development

doi: 10.1515/ijdhd-2017-7008

AbstractThe present study adopted subjective outcome evaluation to examine program effectiveness from the views of implementers (N=375) who implemented the community-based Tier 2 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong. The results revealed that most of the program implementers were satisfied with the program content, their own performance, and program benefits. In agreement with previous studies, the satisfaction ratings of both program content and implementer performance positively predicted perceived program benefits. Regarding the influences of different program delivery approaches, programs with the “interest-enhancement” (INT) element received a more positive evaluation from implementers than did the programs without that element. For programs with the “work-related” (WORK) element, parental involvement significantly raised implementers’ satisfaction ratings on their own performance. The current findings provided evidence for the effectiveness of the P.A.T.H.S. Tier 2 Program from the perspective of the implementers.
Browse All Journals

Related Journals:

Hearing Journal