Land disputes and the ongoing development of the substantive rule of law in Myanmar (Burma)Willis, Nathan
2014 International Journal of Public Law and Policy
doi: 10.1504/IJPLAP.2014.065208
The Myanmar Parliament has passed the Farmland Law and the Vacant, Fallow, and Virgin Lands Management Law. Both pieces of legislation form part of a legislative response as Myanmar (Burma) emerges from a sixty-year period of chronic armed conflict. Part 2 of this paper outlines the underlying grievances associated with land disputes with a focus upon Kayin (Karen) and Rakhine (Arakan) states. Part 3 critically analyses the relevant constitutional and legislative framework and the role of parliamentary bodies in light of these underlying grievances. Part 4 adopts a comparative stance and considers the approach taken in Kenya as it has sought to address similar issues. Finally, Part 5 reflects upon the role that constitutional and legislative reform in relation to land disputes plays in the ongoing development of the substantive rule of law in Myanmar (Burma).
EU competition law on electricity sector liberalisationWisuttisak, Pornchai
2014 International Journal of Public Law and Policy
doi: 10.1504/IJPLAP.2014.065209
This paper aims to study how competition law helps facilitate the process of EU electricity liberalisation and study the use of competition law on the liberalised EU energy market. This paper provides an overview of competition law regarding to purposes of EU competition law and articles 101, 102 and 106 of EC Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The paper explores the role of competition law on EU electricity market liberalisation and focuses on the three main directive packages that transform EU electricity market towards competition. It further explores competition law enforcement that facilitates the structural change in EU electricity sector and discusses how the EU Competition Commission utilise the competition law to decrease market barriers in EU electricity sector. Finally the paper focuses on possible issues for competition law on EU electricity sector, especially on merger and acquisition cases. The last part provides conclusion of the paper.
The shift of Indonesian Government response to investor-state arbitration claim in public interest-related casesPrihandono, Iman
2014 International Journal of Public Law and Policy
doi: 10.1504/IJPLAP.2014.065211
This article aims at analysing factors that influence the changing response of the Indonesian Government to investor-state arbitration claims where public interest issues are involved. This article finds that the government strategy in responding to arbitration threat has been shifting over time. This shift may be found in two different phases. The first phase is when the government tends to avoid arbitration. The second phase is when the government is confident with its position and the result of the arbitration proceeding. This article argues that the combination of two factors contributes to the shift of government response, these are: 1) stable increases of FDI inflows and favourable investment climate; 2) Indonesia’s strategic position in the world’s competition for energy resources. All of the cases analysed in this article are related to the operation of TNCs in the natural resources sector. This particular sector is generally known as to have the highest potential to hamper public interest. Therefore, the shift of government response is a good signal and a promising development that the government will tend to protect the interest of the public, particularly when the public interest is in conflict with the interest of foreign investors.
Regulating competition in the Malaysian telecommunication sector: a need for a new approach?Rahman, Nasarudin Abdul ; Ahamat, Haniff ; Jalil, Juriah Abd
2014 International Journal of Public Law and Policy
doi: 10.1504/IJPLAP.2014.065214
The objective of a competition law is to protect the process of competition between firms in the market by preventing any anti-competitive behaviour such as cartel, abuse of dominant position and mergers that have the effect of lessening competition. However, it is often argued that network industries such as telecommunication should be excluded from the application of the generic competition law, as it has particular characteristic such as natural monopoly, the existence of high entry barriers and absence of effective competition in the market which requires continuous monitoring of the market in the form of access regulation and price control. This paper aims to analyse the existing regulatory and institutional framework overseeing competition in the Malaysian telecommunications sector. The main focus of this paper is to analyse the manner in which competition is pursued through specific sector regulation and whether specific rules on competition are effectively and rigorously enforced. This paper then explains the benefits that will arise from the application of the generic competition law to the telecommunication sector and from increasing the role of the competition authority to regulate the same.