Home
Terms |
Privacy |
Security |
Help |
Enterprise Plans |
Contact Us

Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2023 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law

Subject:
Publisher:
Emerald Group Publishing Limited —
Emerald Publishing
ISSN:
1756-1450
Scimago Journal Rank:

2019

Volume 11
Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Mar)

2018

Volume 10
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)

2017

Volume 9
Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)

2016

Volume 8
Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)

2015

Volume 7
Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)

2014

Volume 6
Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 1/2 (Jan)

2013

Volume 5
Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)

2012

Volume 4
Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)

2011

Volume 3
Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)

2010

Volume 2
Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)

2009

Volume 1
Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Apr)
journal article
LitStream Collection
The residential leaseholder’s interest in construction operations

Sawtell, David R.F.

2019 Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law

doi: 10.1108/jppel-12-2018-0037

The owner of residential long leasehold can be significantly affected by construction operations to the building, whether during its initial construction or its subsequent repair, renovation or improvement. This paper aims to consider how a leaseholder has an interest in such construction operations and the extent to which this is taken into consideration in their procurement.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is a general review of how construction law interfaces with property law interests, rights and obligations in the case of a residential leaseholder. The first part of the paper outlines the issues raised by construction operations. The second part of the paper queries the efficacy of any right of redress the leaseholder might have in respect of construction defects. The third part considers the limited nature of the leaseholder’s right to be consulted about construction operations. The paper is predominantly doctrinal in approach, although it references socio-legal research. The paper also contrasts the English law position with Australia.FindingsThe paper concludes that leaseholders have limited input into the procurement of construction operations despite their interest in them. Property law can be used to regulate construction law operations.Originality/valueTo date, the literature dealing specifically with the position of leaseholders, consultation obligations and construction operations has been limited. This paper brings together property law and construction law in analysing the findings of the Hackitt Report into the Grenfell Tower disaster.
Browse All Journals

Related Journals:

Footer

DeepDyve Logo
FacebookTwitter

Features

  • Search and discover articles on DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar
  • Read the full-text of open access and premium content
  • Organize articles with folders and bookmarks
  • Collaborate on and share articles and folders

Info

  • Pricing
  • Enterprise Plans
  • Browse Journals & Topics
  • About DeepDyve

Help

  • Help
  • Publishers
  • Contact Us

Popular Topics

  • COVID-19
  • Climate Change
  • Biopharmaceuticals