Radiation Oncology

Zhao, Mengjing; Zhao, Lihao; Yang, Han; Duan, Yuxia; Li, Gang

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01738-6pmid: 33472660

BackgroundPatients with locally advanced rectal cancer generally have different response rates to preoperative neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. This study investigated the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) as a predictor to forecast the response to neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.MethodsNinety-one locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy between 2015 and 2018 were enrolled. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed before treatment and within 4 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Mean ADC values of regions of interest were evaluated by two radiologists. The tumor response was evaluated according to RESCIST 1.1. The cut-off value for the mean ADC and increasing percentage (ΔADC%) after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The response rate of pre-ADC and ΔADC% above/below the cut-off values was determined using the chi-square test, respectively. Primary tumor progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, based on the pre-ADC and ΔADC% cut-off values.ResultsThe cut-off value of mean pre-ADC and ΔADC% was 0.94 × 10–3 mm2/s (80.36% sensitivity, 74.29% specificity) and 26.0% (73.21% sensitivity, 77.14% specificity), respectively. Lower mean pre-ADC values were related to a better response rate (83.3% vs 29.7%, P < 0.001) and PFS (26.12 vs 17.70 months, P = 0.004). ΔADC% above the cut-off value was also related to a better response rate (83.7% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001) and PFS (26.93 vs 15.65 months, P = 0.034).ConclusionsThe mean ADC pre-treatment value and ΔADC% were potential predictors for the tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy.

Kapitanova, Irina; Biswas, Sharmi; Divekar, Sabrina; Kemmerer, Eric J.; Rostock, Robert A.; Forster, Kenneth M.; Grimm, Rachel J.; Scofield, Carla J.; Grimm, Jimm; Emami, Bahman; Mahadevan, Anand

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01822-5pmid: 34098991

BackgroundBrachial plexopathy is a potentially serious complication from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) that has not been widely studied. Therefore, we compared datasets from two different institutions and generated a brachial plexus dose–response model, to quantify what dose constraints would be needed to minimize the effect on normal tissue while still enabling potent therapy for the tumor.MethodsTwo published SBRT datasets were pooled and modeled from patients at Indiana University and the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center from 1998 to 2007, as well as the Karolinska Institute from 2008 to 2013. All patients in both studies were treated with SBRT for apically located lung tumors localized superior to the aortic arch. Toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and a probit dose response model was created with maximum likelihood parameter fitting.ResultsThis analysis includes a total of 89 brachial plexus maximum point dose (Dmax) values from both institutions. Among the 14 patients who developed brachial plexopathy, the most common complications were grade 2, comprising 7 patients. The median follow-up was 30 months (range 6.1–72.2) in the Karolinska dataset, and the Indiana dataset had a median of 13 months (range 1–71). Both studies had a median range of 3 fractions, but in the Indiana dataset, 9 patients were treated in 4 fractions, and the paper did not differentiate between the two, so our analysis is considered to be in 3–4 fractions, one of the main limitations. The probit model showed that the risk of brachial plexopathy with Dmax of 26 Gy in 3–4 fractions is 10%, and 50% with Dmax of 70 Gy in 3–4 fractions.ConclusionsThis analysis is only a preliminary result because more details are needed as well as additional comprehensive datasets from a much broader cross-section of clinical practices. When more institutions join the QUANTEC and HyTEC methodology of reporting sufficient details to enable data pooling, our field will finally reach an improved understanding of human dose tolerance.

Kobayashi, Haruki; Wakuda, Kazushige; Naito, Tateaki; Mamesaya, Nobuaki; Omori, Shota; Ono, Akira; Kenmotsu, Hirotsugu; Murakami, Haruyasu; Endo, Masahiro; Harada, Hideyuki; Gon, Yasuhiro; Takahashi, Toshiaki

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01780-ypmid: 33731123

BackgroundPatients with lung cancer and interstitial lung disease treated with radiotherapy are at risk of developing radiation pneumonitis. However, the association between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and radiation pneumonitis in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) remains unclear. Furthermore, the prognosis is uncertain for patients with SCLC and ILAs treated with chemoradiotherapy. We investigated the impact of ILAs on radiation pneumonitis and assessed the prognosis of patients with LS-SCLC and ILAs treated with chemoradiotherapy.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 149 patients with LS-SCLC who received first-line treatment between January 2009 and December 2016.ResultsIn the univariate analysis, the patients with ILAs showed a higher incidence rate of radiation pneumonitis compared with those without ILAs (64% vs. 10%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that ILAs were significantly associated with the incidence of radiation pneumonitis. In the univariate analysis, patients with ILAs showed poorer overall survival than those without ILAs (median, 18.9 vs. 67.9 months, P = 0.0338). Multivariate analysis showed that ILAs were a significant independent negative prognostic factor. However, the 2-year and 5-year survival rates for the patients with ILAs treated with chemoradiotherapy were 36% and 26%, respectively, and 8% and 0%, respectively, for those treated with chemotherapy alone.ConclusionsILAs were found to be a predictive factor for radiation pneumonitis in patients with LS-SCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy. Patients with LS-SCLC and ILAs who were treated with chemoradiotherapy had both the possibility of long-term survival and risk of radiation pneumonitis.

Rogowski, Paul; Roach, Mack; Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie; Trapp, Christian; von Bestenbostel, Rieke; Shi, Run; Buchner, Alexander; Stief, Christian; Belka, Claus; Li, Minglun

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01776-8pmid: 33750437

BackgroundDue to improved imaging sensitivity, the term “oligometastatic” prostate cancer disease is diagnosed more often, leading to an increasing interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). There are two types of radiation based MDT applied when treating oligometastatic disease: (1) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) generally used for bone metastases; or (2) SBRT for isolated nodal oligometastases combined with prophylactic elective nodal radiotherapy. This review aims to summarize current evidence data, which may shed light on the optimal management of this heterogeneous group of patients.MethodsA systematic review of the Medline database through PubMed was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All relevant studies published up to November 2020 were identified and screened. Fifty-six titles were included. Besides outcome parameters, different prognostic and predictive factors were assessed, including site of metastases, time between primary treatment and MDT, use of systemic therapies, hormone sensitivity, as well as pattern of recurrence.FindingsEvidence consists largely of retrospective case series and no consistent precise definition of oligometastasis exists, however, most investigators seem to acknowledge the need to distinguish between patients presenting with what is frequently called “synchronous” versus “metachronous” oligometastatic disease. Available data on radiotherapy as MDT demonstrate high local control rates and a small but relevant proportion of patients without progressive disease after 2 years. This holds true for both hormone sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer diseases. The use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging increased dramatically. Radiation doses and field sizes varied considerably among the studies. The search for relevant prognostic and predictive factors is ongoing.ConclusionsTo our best knowledge this review on oligometastatic prostate cancer included the largest number of original articles. It demonstrates the therapeutic potential and challenges of MDT for oligometastatic prostate cancer. Prospective studies are under way and will provide further high-level evidence.

Li, Wende; Li, Sen; Chen, Ivy X.; Liu, Yujiao; Ramjiawan, Rakesh R.; Leung, Chi-Ho; Gerweck, Leo E.; Fukumura, Dai; Loeffler, Jay S.; Jain, Rakesh K.; Duda, Dan G.; Huang, Peigen

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01775-9pmid: 33663521

BackgroundPatients with metastatic HER2/neu-positive (HER2/neu +) breast cancer (BC) often experience treatment resistance, disease recurrences and metastases. Thus, new approaches for improving the treatment of HER2/neu + BC to prevent metastatic dissemination are urgently needed. Our previous studies have shown that losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, increases tumor perfusion and decreases hypoxia in a number of tumor models. Hypoxia reduces the efficacy of radiation and increases metastases. We therefore hypothesized that by modifying tumor stroma and increasing oxygenation, losartan will improve the outcome of radiotherapy and inhibit disease progression in a highly metastatic HER2/neu + murine BC model.MethodsWe established a metastatic HER2/neu + murine BC line (MCa-M3C) and used it to generate mammary fat pad isografts in syngeneic female FVB/N mice. Starting on day 3 after orthotopic tumor implantation, we administered a 7-day losartan treatment (40 mg/kg BW, gavage daily); or a 7-day losartan treatment followed by 20 Gy single dose local irradiation (S-IR) on day 10 (tumor size ~ 100 mm3), or 20 Gy local fractionated (5 × 4 Gy daily) irradiation (F-IR) on days 10–14. We analyzed tumor-growth delay (TGD), development of spontaneous lung metastases, animal survival, tumor vascular density, and tumor hypoxia.ResultsTreatments with S-IR, F-IR, Losartan + S-IR, or Losartan + F-IR resulted in a significantly increased TGD (8–16 days) in MCa-M3C tumors versus controls. However, the combination of Losartan + S-IR and Losartan + F-IR further enhanced tumor response to radiation alone by increasing TGD an additional 5 to 8 days for both single and fractionated dose irradiation (P < 0.01), decreasing lung metastasis (Losartan + IR vs. Control, P < 0.025), and increasing animal survival (Losartan + IR vs. Control, P = 0.0303). In addition, losartan treatment significantly increased tumor vascularity (P = 0.0314) and decreased pimonidazole positive (hypoxic) area (P = 0.0002).ConclusionsCombining losartan with local irradiation significantly enhanced tumor response, at least in part via reduced tumor hypoxia presumably due to increased tumor perfusion. Our findings suggest that combining losartan with radiotherapy is a potential new treatment strategy for local control and inhibiting metastasis in HER2 + BC.

Park, Sunmin; Rim, Chai Hong; Yoon, Won Sup

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01806-5pmid: 33879201

PurposeBreast radiotherapy set-up is often uncertain. Actual dose distribution to normal tissues could be different from planned dose distribution. The objective of this study was to investigate such difference in dose distribution according to the extent of set-up error in breast radiotherapy.Materials and methodsA total of 50 Gy with fraction size of 2 Gy was given to 30 left breasts with different set-ups applying a deep inspiration breath holding (DIBH) or a free breathing (FB) technique. Under the assumption that errors might come from translational axes of deep or caudal directions, the isocenter was shifted from the original tangential alignment every 2.5 mm to simulate uncertainty of deep and caudal tangential set-up in DIBH and FB. Changes were evaluated for dosimetric parameters for the heart, the left ventricle (LV), the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and the ipsilateral lung.ResultsOn the original plan, mean doses of heart and ipsilateral lung were 2.0 ± 1.1 Gy and 3.7 ± 1.4 Gy in DIBH and 8.4 ± 1.3 Gy and 7.8 ± 1.5 Gy in FB, respectively. The change of dose distribution for the heart in DIBH was milder than that in FB. The deeper the tangential set-up, the worse the heart, LV, LAD, and ipsilateral lung doses, showing as much as 49.4%, 56.4%, 90.3%, and 26.1% shifts, respectively, in 5 mm DIBH setup. The caudal set-up did not show significant dose difference. In multiple comparison of DIBH, differences of mean dose occurred in all 7.5 mm deep set-ups for the heart (p = 0.025), the LV (p = 0.049), and LAD (p = 0.025) in DIBH.ConclusionsTo correct set-up error over indicated limitation for deep tangential set-up in DIBH at 5 mm action level, mean heart and ipsilateral lung doses are expected to increase approximately 50% and 25%, respectively.

Stockton, Joanne D.; Tee, Louise; Whalley, Celina; James, Jonathan; Dilworth, Mark; Wheat, Rachel; Nieto, Thomas; , ; Geh, Ian; Barros-Silva, João D.; Beggs, Andrew D.

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01853-ypmid: 34256782

BackgroundPathological complete response (pathCR) in rectal cancer is beneficial, as up to 75% of patients do not experience regrowth of the primary tumour, but it is poorly understood. We hypothesised that the changes seen in the pre-treatment biopsies of pathCR but not seen in residual tumour after chemoradiotherapy were the determinants of responsiveness.MethodsTwo groups of patients with either complete response (pathCR group, N = 24) or no response (poor response group, N = 24) were retrieved. Pre-treatment biopsies of cancers from these patients underwent high read depth amplicon sequencing for a targeted panel, exome sequencing, methylation profiling and immunohistochemistry for DNA repair pathway proteins.ResultsTwenty four patients who underwent pathCR and twenty-four who underwent poor response underwent molecular characterisation. Patients in the pathCR group had significantly higher tumour mutational burden and neoantigen load, frequent copy number alterations but fewer structural variants and enrichment for driver mutations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway. There were no significant differences in tumour heterogeneity as measured by MATH score. Methylation analysis demonstrated enrichment for hypomethyation in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway.DiscussionThe phenomenon of pathCR in rectal cancer may be related to immunovisibility caused by a high tumour mutational burden phenotype. Potential therapy resistance mechanisms involve the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway, but tumour heterogeneity does not seem to play a role in resistance.

Park, Jaehyeon; Yea, Ji Woon; Oh, Se An; Park, Jae Won

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01947-7pmid: 34775988

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery is a standard treatment modality for locally-advanced esophageal cancer. However, patients who achieve clinical complete response (cCR) after nCRT have been reported to have better prognosis. Further, the role of surgery in these patients is controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether surgery is still useful in patients with cCR after nCRT.MethodsWe systematically reviewed the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases for studies on surgical efficacy in complete responders after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The publication date was set to January 1, 2010–January 31, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio were used to compare the 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), incidence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and treatment mortality between the nCRT and nCRT plus surgery groups.ResultsSix articles involving 609 patients were included. There was a significant benefit of nCRT for OS (HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.99, p = 0.04), but not for DFS (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.35–6.86, p = 0.56). The nCRT group tended to have lower mortality than the nCRT plus surgery group (risk ratio = 0.15, 95% CI 0.02–1.18, p = 0.07).ConclusionOmitting surgery provides better OS in complete responders after nCRT. Adding surgery could increase the morbidity and mortality and decrease the quality of life. Thus, nCRT alone could be a feasible approach for patients with cCR.

Hadi, Indrawati; Reitz, Daniel; Bodensohn, Raphael; Roengvoraphoj, Olarn; Lietke, Stefanie; Niyazi, Maximilian; Tonn, Jörg-Christian; Belka, Claus; Thon, Niklas; Nachbichler, Silke Birgit

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01762-0pmid: 33622365

PurposeFrequency and risk profile of radiation necrosis (RN) in patients with glioma undergoing either upfront stereotactic brachytherapy (SBT) and additional salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after tumor recurrence or vice versa remains unknown.MethodsPatients with glioma treated with low-activity temporary iodine-125 SBT at the University of Munich between 1999 and 2016 who had either additional upfront or salvage EBRT were included. Biologically effective doses (BED) were calculated. RN was diagnosed using stereotactic biopsy and/or metabolic imaging. The rate of RN was estimated with the Kaplan Meier method. Risk factors were obtained from logistic regression models.ResultsEighty-six patients (49 male, 37 female, median age 47 years) were included. 38 patients suffered from low-grade and 48 from high-grade glioma. Median follow-up was 15 months after second treatment. Fifty-eight patients received upfront EBRT (median total dose: 60 Gy), and 28 upfront SBT (median reference dose: 54 Gy, median dose rate: 10.0 cGy/h). Median time interval between treatments was 19 months. RN was diagnosed in 8/75 patients. The 1- and 2-year risk of RN was 5.1% and 11.7%, respectively. Tumor volume and irradiation time of SBT, number of implanted seeds, and salvage EBRT were risk factors for RN. Neither of the BED values nor the time interval between both treatments gained prognostic influence.ConclusionThe combination of upfront EBRT and salvage SBT or vice versa is feasible for glioma patients. The risk of RN is mainly determined by the treatment volume but not by the interval between therapies.

He, Huifang; Li, Jiyuan; Jiang, Ping; Tian, Suqing; Wang, Hao; Fan, Ruitai; Liu, Junqi; Yang, Yuyan; Liu, Zhibo; Wang, Junjie

2021 Radiation Oncology

doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01939-7pmid: 34743756

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) was first proposed as early as 1936, and research on BNCT has progressed relatively slowly but steadily. BNCT is a potentially useful tool for cancer treatment that selectively damages cancer cells while sparing normal tissue. BNCT is based on the nuclear reaction that occurs when 10B capture low-energy thermal neutrons to yield high-linear energy transfer (LET) α particles and recoiling 7Li nuclei. A large number of 10B atoms have to be localized within the tumor cells for BNCT to be effective, and an adequate number of thermal neutrons need to be absorbed by the 10B atoms to generate lethal 10B (n, α)7Li reactions. Effective boron neutron capture therapy cannot be achieved without appropriate boron carriers. Improvement in boron delivery and the development of the best dosing paradigms for both boronophenylalanine (BPA) and sodium borocaptate (BSH) are of major importance, yet these still have not been optimized. Here, we present a review of this treatment modality from the perspectives of radiation oncology, biology, and physics. This manuscript provides a brief introduction of the mechanism of cancer-cell-selective killing by BNCT, radiobiological factors, and progress in the development of boron carriers and neutron sources as well as the results of clinical study.