Home

Footer

DeepDyve Logo
FacebookTwitter

Features

  • Search and discover articles on DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar
  • Read the full-text of open access and premium content
  • Organize articles with folders and bookmarks
  • Collaborate on and share articles and folders

Info

  • Pricing
  • Enterprise Plans
  • Browse Journals & Topics
  • About DeepDyve

Help

  • Help
  • Publishers
  • Contact Us

Popular Topics

  • COVID-19
  • Climate Change
  • Biopharmaceuticals
Terms |
Privacy |
Security |
Help |
Enterprise Plans |
Contact Us

Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2023 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Journal of Adult Protection

Subject:
Law
Publisher:
Emerald Group Publishing Limited —
Emerald Publishing
ISSN:
1466-8203
Scimago Journal Rank:
17

2023

Volume 25
Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2022

Volume 24
Issue 5/6 (Dec)Issue 3/4 (Oct)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2021

Volume 23
Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

2020

Volume 23
Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 22
Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2019

Volume 22
Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 21
Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Mar)

2018

Volume 20
Issue 5/6 (Nov)Issue 3/4 (Oct)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2017

Volume 19
Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)

2016

Volume 18
Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2015

Volume 17
Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2014

Volume 16
Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2013

Volume 15
Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2012

Volume 14
Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2011

Volume 13
Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Feb)

2010

Volume 12
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

2009

Volume 11
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Feb)

2008

Volume 10
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

2007

Volume 9
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Mar)

2006

Volume 8
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (May)

2005

Volume 7
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jun)

2004

Volume 6
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Apr)

2003

Volume 5
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

2002

Volume 4
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

2001

Volume 3
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

2000

Volume 2
Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Feb)

1999

Volume 1
Issue 1 (Aug)
journal article
LitStream Collection
Developing an adult safeguarding outcome measure in England

Norrie, Caroline; Cartwright, Cher; Rayat, Pritpal; Grey, Michelle; Manthorpe, Jill

2015 The Journal of Adult Protection

doi: 10.1108/JAP-12-2014-0039

Purpose– There are currently no national adult safeguarding outcome measures that focus on people who have been through an adult safeguarding investigation in England. There is a need for local authorities (LAs) and their partners to be able to measure whether the services provided to adults at risk of abuse and neglect are effective. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach– This paper describes the cognitive testing phase of a study to develop and implement a standardised adult at risk outcome measure in adult safeguarding for use by LAs in England. An outcome measure (a set of seven survey questions administered in a face to face interview) was cognitively tested in three LAs with adults at risk (or their carers/advocates) for whom an investigation of abuse had been concluded (n=40), with the aim of assessing whether it was commonly understood. A set of guidance notes was designed and LA staff (n=12) who assisted with the survey were interviewed about its usability and the feasibility of administering the survey. Findings– The survey questions required modifications to improve their reliability, validity and comparability. LA staff also suggested improvements were needed in the guidance document and survey. LA managers, adults at risk (and their relatives/carers/advocates) were willing to be involved in the survey and it was considered feasible to proceed with piloting the measure. Originality/value– The development of this unique survey is of interest to those working in adult safeguarding, user involvement, survey management and outcome measurement in LAs.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Student nurses on placement – collaborators or challengers

Clarke, Pat

2015 The Journal of Adult Protection

doi: 10.1108/JAP-11-2014-0032

Purpose– All nursing students have the opportunity to gain experience in the Independent Sector. The Health and Social Care Act (2012) in the UK has led to more health services being provided by the Independent Sector. The purpose of this paper is to explore the perceptions of first year student nurses of their learning experience in nursing homes placements within the Independent Sector. Design/methodology/approach– Two focus groups were undertaken with first year student nurses, one with six students and the other with seven students. All students had completed four week clinical placements in nursing homes. The focus groups were semi structured. Thematic analysis was undertaken on the data. Findings– Important themes that emerged from the data included: leadership issues, poor practice relating to infection control and manual handling, team dynamics, commitment to addressing issues when raised and challenges to raising issues within the placement area. The findings provided an insight into some of the barriers for student nurses when raising issues. The decision to raise concerns was multifactorial and complex. Attention was also focused on the relationship between the mentor and the student and the impact that can have on the learning environment. Research limitations/implications– The limitations for this study included: this was a small scale study, the findings were from a small number of placement areas within a small geographical area of the UK. Some students may have felt reluctant to share their views in a focus group. The findings reflect the views of first year student nurses only. However, first year students can provide an alternative view of a placement area. Their lack of experience can be an opportunity to question accepted norms with the mentor, acting as a resource of new ideas. Originality/value– This paper identified opportunities and challenges for student nurses and education providers alike. For the student it was the complexities of raising issues and for the education provider it was equipping students with the knowledge and skills to raise such issues not only as a student but also upon qualification.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Do mates hate? A framing of the theoretical position of mate crime and an assessment of its practical impact

Doherty, Ged

2015 The Journal of Adult Protection

doi: 10.1108/JAP-12-2014-0041

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to explore the phenomenon of mate crime and attempts to assess its practical as well as its theoretical implications. Design/methodology/approach– It begins with an account of the short history of the concept and then positions mate crime within academic theorising around general hate crime and disability. Findings– Particular reference is made to the significance of the issue of vulnerability and how its interpretation might affect understanding of this phenomenon. Research limitations/implications– This is followed by some observations on how agencies of social policy and the legislature are responding to the issue of mate crime. Practical implications– Particular reference is paid to the impact of safeguarding adults procedures. Originality/value– It concludes that, although “mates” can (and do) “hate”, further research is required on the subject in order to gain better knowledge of the issue from both a theoretical and a practice position.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Better information sharing, or “share or be damned”?

Grace, Jamie

2015 The Journal of Adult Protection

doi: 10.1108/JAP-01-2015-0001

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to explore the ramifications of developments in surveillance policies and technologies for information sharing cultures in a “public protection routine”. Design/methodology/approach– This conceptual paper uses a mixed theoretical, legal and policy-based approach to inform this exploration of the ramifications of developments in surveillance policies and technologies. Findings– This conceptual paper concludes that developments in surveillance policies and technologies as part of the “public protection routine” will result in a damaging and hasty culture of “share or be damned” unless a more careful approach to new information sharing approaches is developed. Otherwise, an increasing bureaucratisation of risk management through surveillance will lead to a disregard for the fine balance between public protection, procedural rights and privacy. Originality/value– The originality and value of this conceptual paper is considerable – as some of the case studies discussed are very recent ones, and ones that represent an acceleration of the problems within the “public protection routine” which this paper seeks to unpick.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Reading the death of Mrs A: a serious case review

Foley, Marian; Cummins, Ian

2015 The Journal of Adult Protection

doi: 10.1108/JAP-12-2014-0038

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to report the main themes identified into the Serious Case Review (SCR) produced by Surrey Safeguarding Adults Board (SSAB) regarding the suicide of Mrs A in January 2013. Design/methodology/approach– A case study approach is used to examine the SCR. The paper links the findings of the SCR with the broader literature, which has examined the experiences of witnesses and complainants in cases of sexual violence. Findings– The report emphasises that support for witnesses in historic sexual assault cases has improved but there are still significant gaps in provision. In particular, the systems need to support witnesses for longer after giving evidence. Mental health services need to be more aware of the potential impact of Court cases on victims of sexual violence. The case also highlights the potentially devastating impact of the media reporting of evidence given by victims in rape cases. Practical implications– The authors hope that a wider consideration of the circumstances of this case will lead to a greater focus on the needs of victims in cases of historic rape and other sexual assault cases. The SCR highlights that the provision of support for women giving evidence in sexual abuse cases is patchy. Such cases raise very serious ethical issues including the question of how to use the special measures that exist to support vulnerable or intimidated witnesses. Originality/value– The paper brings together a number of themes in the wider literature and links them to current practice. It also uses a case study approach to exploring the implications for women, in cases of historical sexual abuse, of giving evidence in Court proceedings.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Mental capacity and deprivation of liberty: the Law Commission’s consultation paper

Spencer-Lane, Tim

2015 The Journal of Adult Protection

doi: 10.1108/JAP-08-2015-0022

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to introduce the readership to the consultation being held by the Law Commission concerning proposed revisions to the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Design/methodology/approach– Discussion of the consultation being held by the Law Commission concerning proposed revisions to the DoLS. Findings– These are as yet unknown as the consultation period is ongoing – it is planned that a future paper will examine the findings and recommendations from the consultation process. Practical implications– There has been criticism of the DoLS since their introduction in 2009. A new scheme provides the opportunity to respond to some of the criticisms and to develop more appropriate processes. The paper invites readers to take part in the consultation process and to respond to the proposals that have been developed. Social implications– A new and more appropriate scheme would be beneficial for service users and families/caregivers. Originality/value– This is the first opportunity for a revision to the DoLS scheme and introduction of the proposed scheme and the consultation process to the readership is highly appropriate and valuable to the Journal.
Browse All Journals

Related Journals:

Journal of Legal StudiesEuropean Law JournalEuropean Journal of CriminologyJournal of Experimental CriminologyCriminology and Criminal JusticeJournal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeJournal of CriminologyCriminal Justice ReviewInternational Journal of Constitutional LawCriminal Justice Policy Review