journal article
LitStream Collection
Home
Bruder, Corinna ; Kroese, Biza Stenfert; Bland, Sarah Stenfert
2005 The Journal of Adult Protection
The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate how the proceedings of a vulnerable adult protection policy is understood by referrers to affect the psychological and emotional well-being of adults with a learning disability. During the research process seven referrers of vulnerable adults discussed twelve different cases in in-depth interviews. The interviews and matching case notes of protection meetings released by social services were analysed by the application of grounded theory techniques. The result is a model that highlights how appraisals of the experience the emotional and behavioural reactions of the vulnerable adults are shaped by the nature of the abuse, the actions taken by protection meetings, the expectations of the vulnerable adults and the availability of support.
Corinna Bruder; Biza Kroese; Sarah Bland
2005 The Journal of Adult Protection
doi: 10.1108/14668203200500014
The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate how the proceedings of a vulnerable adult protection policy is understood by referrers to affect the psychological and emotional well‐being of adults with a learning disability. During the research process seven referrers of vulnerable adults discussed twelve different cases in in‐depth interviews. The interviews and matching case notes of protection meetings released by social services were analysed by the application of grounded theory techniques. The result is a model that highlights how appraisals of the experience the emotional and behavioural reactions of the vulnerable adults are shaped by the nature of the abuse, the actions taken by protection meetings, the expectations of the vulnerable adults and the availability of support.
Manthorpe, Jill ; Perkins, Neil ; Penhale, Bridget ; Pinkney, Lisa ; Kingston, Paul
2005 The Journal of Adult Protection
This article updates a review submitted to the Department of Health (DH) in the light of the House of Commons Health Select Committee report on Elder Abuse. The review drew on recent research about elder abuse in the UK, including research published after the Select Committee's hearings, that made specific recommendations for areas of development in research and policy. The aim of this paper is to address specific questions posed by the Select Committee in light of developments up to mid 2005.
Jill Manthorpe; Neil Perkins; Bridget Penhale; Lisa Pinkney; Paul Kingston
2005 The Journal of Adult Protection
doi: 10.1108/14668203200500015
This article updates a review submitted to the Department of Health (DH) in the light of the House of Commons Health Select Committee report on Elder Abuse. The review drew on recent research about elder abuse in the UK, including research published after the Select Committee's hearings, that made specific recommendations for areas of development in research and policy. The aim of this paper is to address specific questions posed by the Select Committee in light of developments up to mid 2005.
2005 The Journal of Adult Protection
doi: 10.1108/14668203200500016
The Green Paper's vision for the future of adult social care confirms New Labour's subsumption of the specific social problem of ‘elder abuse’ under a generic adult protection strategy, explicitly located within an overarching policy and legislative framework of social care generally.
2005 The Journal of Adult Protection
The Green Paper's vision for the future of adult social care confirms New Labour's subsumption of the specific social problem of ‘elder abuse’ under a generic adult protection strategy, explicitly located within an overarching policy and legislative framework of social care generally.