journal article
Download Only Collection
Home
2020 Journal of Public Relations Research
doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2020.1848841
This study proposes a theoretical model that provides a segmentation method of publics based on their cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses toward corporate social advocacy (CSA). As one of the initial efforts in building a theory of CSA in public relations scholarship, the model segments consumers based on three outcome variables – boycott intention, purchase intention, and corporate reputation. This model also incorporates consumer-company congruence, company-cause fit, consumer-cause fit, and issue involvement as antecedent variables. A survey of 482 adult consumers found that consumer-company congruence and company-cause fit had significant negative impacts on boycott intention, but positive influences on purchase intention. Consumer-company congruence, company-cause fit, and consumer-cause fit all had significant positive impacts on corporate reputation. Moreover, interaction effects between company-cause fit and consumers’ involvement with the specific CSA issue were found significant on both boycott intention and purchase intention. How these findings help advance the understanding of publics in a CSA context is discussed.
2020 Journal of Public Relations Research
doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2020.1861949
Drawing on insights from the corporate ability (CA) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) associations framework, the associative network theory (ANT) of memory, and crisis communication literature on the CA-CSR crisis typology, this study examines the impact of CSR crises on stakeholders’ responses via the underlying mechanism of the spillover from CSR onto CA associations. Using the context of Uber’s CSR crisis events in early 2017, results from a survey (N = 510) among participants in the United States showed that in CSR crises, weakened CSR associations had a spillover effect onto CA associations. The effects from both CSR and CA associations then influenced stakeholders’ company and product evaluations, which in turn led to negative word-of-mouth intention. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Lee, Sun Young; Kim, Young; Kim, Yeuseung
2020 Journal of Public Relations Research
doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2021.1888734
This study explores the impact of organization–public relationships (OPRs) and issue-related situational factors on publics’ intention to participate in CSR campaigns, based on relationship management theory and the situational theory of problem-solving (STOPS). We surveyed 698 respondents living in the United States about two CSR campaigns, one focused on girls’ empowerment and one on deforestation. The results showed that situational motivation and OPRs were strongly and directly related to publics’ participation intention for both CSR campaigns. Only two situational perceptions – constraint recognition and involvement recognition – were indirectly related to publics’ participation. We discuss the theoretical implications of these findings.
Showing 1 to 4 of 4 Articles