journal article
LitStream Collection
Home
Graziano, Paulo A.; Spiegel, Jamie A.; Hayes, Timothy; Arcia, Emily; ,
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000810pmid: 37166851
Objective: As part of a larger community-based, service-driven research project, the primary purpose of this pilot randomized study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering time-limited adaptations of parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT) and child–parent psychotherapy (CPP) within a sample of children experiencing homelessness. The secondary goal was to examine the promise of both interventions in improving parent/child outcomes. Method: One hundred forty-four young children (18 month–5 years old; Mage = 3.48, SD = 1.09; 43.1% female; 78.5% Black/African American; 27.1% Hispanic) and their mothers were recruited from a women’s homeless shelter and randomly assigned to 12 weeks of either PCIT or CPP delivered by shelter clinicians on-site. Attendance, fidelity, and program satisfaction were obtained. Families completed pre- and postintervention assessments, including observational data on maternal verbalizations during a child-led play session. Results: Both time-limited PCIT and time-limited CPP were successfully implemented with similarly high levels of intervention fidelity (>90%) and satisfaction by mothers (85%). Completion rates were similar across both time-limited PCIT (76.6%) and time-limited CPP (71.4%). Both time-limited CPP and PCIT resulted in decreases in children’s posttraumatic stress, parental stress, and increases in maternal positive verbalizations. Only time-limited PCIT resulted in significant improvements in externalizing behavior problems in children and reductions in maternal negative verbalizations. Conclusions: Time-limited PCIT and CPP are acceptable, feasible, and hold significant promise for helping families within a homeless shelter environment and by extension, other transitional and/or shelter environments. A full randomized trial is warranted to determine which program may offer a more effective intervention.
Stice, Eric; Rohde, Paul; Gau, Jeff M.; Bearman, Sarah Kate; Shaw, Heather
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000806pmid: 36892885
Objective: College students are at particularly high risk for mental health problems, such as eating disorders, which are associated with functional impairment, distress, and morbidity, but barriers limit implementation of evidence-based interventions at colleges. We evaluated the effectiveness and implementation quality of a peer educator (PE) delivered eating disorder prevention program (the Body Project [BP]), which has a broad evidence-based using a train-the-trainer (TTT) approach and experimentally evaluated three levels of implementation support. Method: We recruited 63 colleges with peer educator programs and randomly assigned them to (a) receive a 2-day TTT training in which peer educators were trained to implement the Body Project and supervisors were taught how to train future peer educators (TTT), (b) TTT training plus a technical assistance (TA) workshop (TTT + TA), or (c) TTT plus the TA workshop and quality assurance (QA) consultations over 1-year (TTT + TA + QA). Colleges recruited undergraduates (N = 1,387, 98% female, 55% White) to complete Body Project groups. Results: There were no significant differences across condition for attendance, adherence, competence, and reach, though nonsignificant trends suggested some benefit of TTT + TA + QA relative to TTT for adherence and competence (ds = .40 and .30). Adding TA and QA to TTT was associated with significantly larger reductions in risk factors and eating disorder symptoms. Conclusions: Results suggest that the Body Project can be effectively implemented at colleges using peer educators and a TTT approach and that adding TA and QA resulted in significantly larger improvements in outcomes for group participants, and marginally higher adherence and competence.
Tremblay, Joël; Dufour, Magali; Bertrand, Karine; Saint-Jacques, Marianne; Ferland, Francine; Blanchette-Martin, Nadine; Savard, Annie-Claude; Côté, Mélissa; Berbiche, Djamal; Beaulieu, Myriam
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000765pmid: 36521131
Objective: Assess the efficacy of integrative couple treatment for pathological gambling (ICT-PG) in comparison to treatment provided in an individual approach. Method: Eighty couples were assigned randomly to ICT-PG (n = 44, Mage = 42.2, SD [13.4], n male gamblers = 29) or individual treatment (n = 36, Mage = 39.9 SD [13.0], n male gamblers = 31) with follow-ups at 4- and 10-months postadmission regarding the severity of gambling, the individual and couple’s well-being. Linear mixed and generalized estimating equation models for repeated measures were applied to take into account the dependency of observations. Protocol was preregistered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT02240485). Results: Participants in both treatments generally improved over time with reductions on gambling expanses from an initial $4,000–$600 in a 90-day period following treatment, without difference across treatment conditions in money spent on gambling or frequency of gambling. However, on different indices of gambling severity, the participants in ICT-PG showed more improvement at follow-ups, with better control capacity (OR = 2.57, p < .0129) and greater reduction in gambling craving (OR = 5.83, p < .0001) and erroneous cognitions (OR = 2.63, p < .0063). The couple treatment was associated with a better individual well-being (e.g., less depression for partners, OR = 5.53; p < .0351, and gamblers, OR = 2.37; p < .0334) and couple well-being (e.g., better dyadic satisfaction for partners, OR = 2.02; p < .0057, and gamblers, OR = 3.07; p < .0212). Conclusions: The results underline the necessity to provide a greater diversity of treatment for gamblers and their partner. Further research should focus on identifying active components of ICT-PG and widen its provision to gamblers with concurrent addiction disorders.
Weintraub, Marc J.; Denenny, Danielle; Ichinose, Megan C.; Zinberg, Jamie; Morgan-Fleming, Georga; Done, Monica; Brown, Robin D.; Bearden, Carrie E.; Miklowitz, David J.
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000782pmid: 36649157
Objectives: There is substantial evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) improve symptoms and functioning in adults with mood and psychotic disorders. There has been little work directly comparing these treatments among adolescents with early-onset mood or psychosis symptoms. Method: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing remotely administered group CBT to group MBCT for adolescents (ages 13–17) with a mood disorder or attenuated psychosis symptoms. Adolescents attended nine sessions over 2 months; their parents attended parallel groups focused on the same skill practices. Participants were assessed for psychiatric symptoms and functioning at posttreatment and 3 months posttreatment. Results: Sixty-six youth (Mage = 15.1 years, SD = 1.4; 44 females [66.7%]) initiated the trial (32 in CBT and 34 in MBCT), with 54 retained at posttreatment and 53 at the 3-month follow-up. The treatments were associated with comparable improvements in adolescents’ mood, anxiety, attenuated psychosis symptoms, and psychosocial functioning over 5 months. CBT was associated with greater improvements than MBCT in emotion regulation and well-being during the posttreatment period. MBCT (compared to CBT) was associated with greater improvements in social functioning among adolescents with greater childhood adversity. Both treatments had comparable rates of retention, but youth and parents reported more satisfaction with CBT than MBCT. Conclusions: The beneficial effect of both treatments in a group telehealth format is encouraging. Due to our limited sample, future research should investigate whether adolescents’ history of adversity and treatment preferences replicate as treatment moderators for youth with mood or psychosis symptoms.
Tolin, David F.; Levy, Hannah C.; Hallion, Lauren S.; Wootton, Bethany M.; Jaccard, James; Diefenbach, Gretchen J.; Stevens, Michael C.
doi: 10.1037/ccp0000804pmid: 36877480
Objective: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is efficacious for hoarding disorder (HD), though results are modest. HD patients show an increase in activity in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) when making decisions. The aim of this study is to determine whether CBT’s benefits follow improvements in dACC dysfunction or abnormalities previously identified in other brain regions. Method: In this randomized clinical trial of 64 treatment-seeking HD patients, patients received group CBT, delivered weekly for 16 weeks, versus wait list. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to examine neural activity during simulated decisions about whether to acquire and discard objects. Results: During acquiring decisions, activity decreased in several regions, including right dorsolateral prefrontal, right anterior intraparietal area, both right and left medial intraparietal areas, left and right amygdala, and left accumbens. During discarding decisions, activity decreased in right and left dorsolateral prefrontal, right and left rostral cingulate, left anterior ventral insular cortex, and right medial intraparietal areas. None of the a priori brain parcels of interest significantly mediated symptom reduction. Moderation effects were found for left rostral cingulate, right and left caudal cingulate, and left medial intraparietal parcels. Conclusions: Therapeutic benefits of CBT for HD do not appear to be mediated by changes in dACC activation. However, pretreatment dACC activation predicts outcome. Findings suggest the need to re-evaluate emerging neurobiological models of HD and our understanding of how CBT affects the brain in HD, and perhaps shift focuses to new neural target discovery and target engagement trials.
Showing 1 to 6 of 6 Articles