journal article
Download Only Collection
Home
Smyth, J F; Coleman, R E; Nicolson, M; Gallmeier, W M; Leonard, R C; Cornbleet, M A; Allan, S G; Upadhyaya, B K; Bruntsch, U
doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1423pmid: 1837743
OBJECTIVE--To determine the contribution of dexamethasone to the efficacy of the 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist ondansetron in control of cisplatin induced nausea and vomiting. DESIGN--Randomised double blind crossover study. SETTING--Two cancer centres in teaching hospitals, one in the United Kingdom and the other in Germany. SUBJECTS--100 patients (53 men and 47 women) new to cisplatin chemotherapy, 84 of whom completed two consecutive courses of chemotherapy. INTERVENTIONS--Patients were given intravenous dexamethasone (20 mg) or physiological saline with intravenous ondansetron 8 mg before cisplatin, then ondansetron 1 mg/h for 24 hours. Oral ondansetron 8 mg was taken three times daily on days 2-6. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Incidence of complete or major control of emesis (0-2 episodes in the 24 hours after chemotherapy). RESULTS--Complete or major control was obtained in 49 out of 71 (69%) of patients after receiving ondansetron plus dexamethasone compared with 40 out of 71 (56%) when they were given ondansetron alone (p = 0.012). This effect was most pronounced in the first 12 hours after chemotherapy. Patients receiving the combination also had significantly less nausea. Of the 53 patients who expressed a preference, 38 (72%) preferred the combination treatment (p = 0.002) to ondansetron alone. The effect of ondansetron on delayed emesis was less pronounced. CONCLUSIONS--Dexamethasone makes a significant contribution to the efficacy of ondansetron in the control of acute platinum induced emesis.
van Schayck, C P; Dompeling, E; van Herwaarden, C L; Folgering, H; Verbeek, A L; van der Hoogen, H J; van Weel, C
doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1426pmid: 1837744
OBJECTIVE--To examine the effect of bronchodilator treatment given continuously versus on demand on the progression of asthma and chronic bronchitis and to compare the long term effects of a beta 2 adrenergic drug (salbutamol) and an anticholinergic drug (ipratropium bromide). DESIGN--Two year randomised controlled prospective 'crossover' study in which patients were assigned to one of two parallel treatment groups receiving continuous treatment or treatment on demand. SETTING--29 general practices in the catchment area of the University of Nijmegen. PATIENTS--223 patients aged greater than or equal to 30 with moderate airway obstruction due to asthma or chronic bronchitis, selected by their general practitioners. INTERVENTIONS--1600 micrograms salbutamol or 160 micrograms ipratropium bromide daily (113 patients) or salbutamol or ipratropium bromide only during exacerbations or periods of dyspnoea (110). No other pulmonary treatment was permitted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Decline in ventilatory function and change in bronchial responsiveness, respiratory symptoms, number of exacerbations, and quality of life. RESULTS--Among 144 patients completing the study, after correction for possible confounding factors the decline in forced expiratory volume in one second was -0.072 l/year in continuously treated patients and -0.020 l/year in those treated on demand (p less than 0.05), irrespective of the drug. The difference in the decline in patients with asthma was comparable with that in patients with chronic bronchitis (asthma: 0.092 v -0.025 l/year; chronic bronchitis: -0.082 v -0.031 l/year). Bronchial responsiveness increased slightly (0.4 doubling dose) with continuous treatment in chronic bronchitis, but exacerbations, symptoms, and quality of life were unchanged. Salbutamol and ipratropium bromide had comparable effects on all variables investigated. CONCLUSIONS--Continuous bronchodilator treatment without anti-inflammatory treatment accelerates decline in ventilatory function. Bronchodilators should be used only on demand, with additional corticosteroid treatment, if necessary.
Showing 1 to 10 of 66 Articles