Home

Footer

DeepDyve Logo
FacebookTwitter

Features

  • Search and discover articles on DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar
  • Read the full-text of open access and premium content
  • Organize articles with folders and bookmarks
  • Collaborate on and share articles and folders

Info

  • Pricing
  • Enterprise Plans
  • Browse Journals & Topics
  • About DeepDyve

Help

  • Help
  • Publishers
  • Contact Us

Popular Topics

  • COVID-19
  • Climate Change
  • Biopharmaceuticals
Terms |
Privacy |
Security |
Help |
Enterprise Plans |
Contact Us

Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2023 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

Subject:
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Publisher:
Emerald Group Publishing Limited —
Emerald Publishing
ISSN:
0952-6862
Scimago Journal Rank:
50

2022

Volume 35
Issue 1 (Sep)

2021

Volume 34
Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Feb)

2020

Volume 33
Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 4/5 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2019

Volume 33
Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 32
Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2018

Volume 31
Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2017

Volume 30
Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2016

Volume 29
Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2015

Volume 28
Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2014

Volume 27
Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2013

Volume 26
Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2012

Volume 25
Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2011

Volume 24
Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Sep)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2010

Volume 23
Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Sep)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2009

Volume 22
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2008

Volume 21
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2007

Volume 20
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2006

Volume 19
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2005

Volume 18
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2004

Volume 17
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2003

Volume 16
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2002

Volume 15
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2001

Volume 14
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2000

Volume 13
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1999

Volume 12
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1998

Volume 11
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1997

Volume 10
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1996

Volume 9
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1995

Volume 8
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1994

Volume 7
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1993

Volume 6
Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1992

Volume 5
Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1991

Volume 5
Issue 1 (Jan)
Volume 4
Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1990

Volume 3
Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1989

Volume 2
Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1988

Volume 1
Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
journal article
LitStream Collection
Examining the behavioural intention of inpatients in Indian government hospitals

Singh, Deepti; Dixit, Kavaldeep

2022 International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

doi: 10.1108/ijhcqa-03-2021-0054pmid: 35048622

The purpose of this research is to examine the impact of perceived service quality (PSQ) on the behavioural intention (BI) of patients in Indian government hospitals. The underlying mechanism of trust and patient satisfaction (SAT) is examined as multiple mediating effect.Design/methodology/approachData from 510 respondents were collected using structured questionnaires. Six government hospitals, namely, S.M.S. Hospital, J.L.N. Hospital, New Medical College Hospital, Maharana Bhupal Medical Hospital, Mathuradas Hospital and P.B.N. Hospital, were selected from the cities of Jaipur, Ajmer, Kota, Udaipur, Jodhpur and Bikaner, respectively. The data were collected from adult patients (>18 years old) who spent at least two nights in a government hospital between 1 October, 2020 and 30 December, 2020. PSQ formed as a reflective-formative model was analysed using the repeated indicator approach. Structural equation modelling (SEM) using SMART-PLS software was used to test the hypothesised model(s) derived deductively from literature.FindingsThe findings support the following conclusions: (1) the positive relationship between PSQ and BI is significant; (2) SAT mediates the PSQ and BI relationship; (3) trust mediates the PSQ and BI relationship; (4) the mediation effect of SAT is stronger than that of trust.Practical implicationsThe results indicate that, in order to enhance the positive BI of patients towards government hospitals, it is necessary for the hospitals to work on strategies to enhance the service quality provided to patients. The outcome of this study will enable state government hospitals to get a better understanding of the different dimensions of service quality and will help in observing the factors that contribute to patients' satisfaction and trust in building long-term relationships by encouraging a positive BI.Originality/valueThere is a dearth of research in India that evaluates the relationships between the constructs PSQ, trust, BI and SAT in the context of healthcare service. This empirical study is an attempt to fill this gap by focussing on the government hospitals in India.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Lean six sigma and stroke in rural hospital – The case of Baruch Padeh Medical Center

Tzadok, Batsheva; Ben Tov, Oran; Vaispapir, Vladimir; Shornikov, Lev; Marik, Olga; Martens, Leon; Tal Or, Eran

2022 International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

doi: 10.1108/ijhcqa-01-2021-0005pmid: 35075887

This case study aims to demonstrate the strengths of the Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology to improve the acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment rates and reduce process lead time at Baruch Padeh Medical Center (BPMC), a rural hospital in the Galilee region of Northern Israel. The LSS project redefined the BPMC stroke care pathway and increased its efficacy.Design/methodology/approachThe LSS methodology was implemented in September 2017 by integrating lean principles and the Six Sigma DMAIC (Define–Measure–Analyze–Improve–Control). Existing procedures, field observation, ad hoc measurement and in-depth interviews were utilized, and the GEMBA method was implemented to identify root cause and improve actions optimizing the stroke pathway.FindingsThe presented case shows the usefulness of the LSS methodology in improving quality performance in a rural hospital. The intervention allowed the BPMC to improve the intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) administration rate (+15.2%), reducing the process lead time. The lead time of door-to-computer tomography decreased from 52 to 26 min, and the door-to-needle time decreased from 94 to 75 min.Originality/valueThe present case study shows the implementation of the LSS methodology aimed to improve the IV-tPA administration rate and reduce the stroke pathway lead time in a rural hospital. The case demonstrates the potential for the LSS methodology to support the AIS pathway optimization and represents a guide for healthcare organizations located in rural areas.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Evaluating patient and medical staff satisfaction from doctor–patient communication

Katsaliaki, Korina

2022 International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

doi: 10.1108/ijhcqa-03-2022-0033pmid: 35915934

The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the views of doctors, nursing staff and hospitalized patients on the level of information they provide and receive respectively in public hospitals, focusing on the factors that affect their communication.Design/methodology/approachThe study used a cross-sectional survey with a sample of 426 participants from two general hospitals in Greece–Pella and KAT Attica. Data were collected through a questionnaire in March–May 2020 and was analyzed with mean comparisons and correlations.FindingsThe results showed discrepancy in the satisfaction rate, with 67.3% satisfied patients from doctors' communication vs. 83.7% satisfied doctors. Improvements in hospital staff – patient communication are required especially on alternative therapies' discussion and time spent on communication. All respondents agreed that staff shortage is a deterrent factor for effective communication. Seamless for all respondents' groups, the factors that affect the communication satisfaction level are the duration of communication, time allowed for expressing questions and interest in patients' personal situation.Practical implicationsStrengthening the communication skills of medical staff and providing clear guidelines on when and how to inform patients are essential.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the growing body of research on doctor–patient communication. Its originality lies on the fact that communication satisfaction level was examined simultaneously for doctors, nurses and patients. The study provides additional evidence supporting the link among satisfaction and duration of communication and personalized relationship. The study's findings are important in the training of medical staff and the management of patients' expectations.
Browse All Journals

Related Journals:

Total Quality Management and Business ExcellenceCorporate Governance (Bingley)Management Research ReviewJournal of International EntrepreneurshipAustralian Journal of ManagementInternational Journal of Wine Business ResearchInternational Journal of Quality and Service SciencesReview of Managerial ScienceServices Marketing QuarterlyHuman Systems Management