Home

Footer

DeepDyve Logo
FacebookTwitter

Features

  • Search and discover articles on DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar
  • Read the full-text of open access and premium content
  • Organize articles with folders and bookmarks
  • Collaborate on and share articles and folders

Info

  • Pricing
  • Enterprise Plans
  • Browse Journals & Topics
  • About DeepDyve

Help

  • Help
  • Publishers
  • Contact Us

Popular Topics

  • COVID-19
  • Climate Change
  • Biopharmaceuticals
Terms |
Privacy |
Security |
Help |
Enterprise Plans |
Contact Us

Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2023 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

International Journal of Public Sector Management

Subject:
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Publisher:
MCB UP Ltd —
Emerald Publishing
ISSN:
0951-3558
Scimago Journal Rank:
61

2023

Volume 36
Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2022

Volume 35
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2021

Volume 34
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Feb)

2020

Volume 34
Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 33
Issue 6/7 (Nov)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 2/3 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

2019

Volume 33
Issue 1 (Nov)
Volume 32
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2018

Volume 31
Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2017

Volume 30
Issue 6-7 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2016

Volume 29
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2015

Volume 28
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 4/5 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2014

Volume 27
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2013

Volume 26
Issue 7 (Sep)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2012

Volume 25
Issue 6/7 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2011

Volume 24
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2010

Volume 23
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2009

Volume 22
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2008

Volume 21
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2007

Volume 20
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2006

Volume 19
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2005

Volume 18
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2004

Volume 17
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2003

Volume 16
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2002

Volume 15
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2001

Volume 14
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2000

Volume 13
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1999

Volume 12
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1998

Volume 11
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 2/3 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1997

Volume 10
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 1/2 (Feb)

1996

Volume 9
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 5/6 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1995

Volume 8
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1994

Volume 7
Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1993

Volume 6
Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1992

Volume 5
Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1991

Volume 4
Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1990

Volume 3
Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1989

Volume 2
Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1988

Volume 1
Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
journal article
LitStream Collection
Adopting a multi‐perspective approach to the study of public sector managerial effectiveness

Stephen George Willcocks

2002 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513550210430228

Suggests that there is a need to explore managerial public sector effectiveness given its complexity and subjective nature. Argues the case for a multi‐perspective approach to public sector effectiveness, based on specific, inter‐related perspectives. Chooses these perspectives based on their ability to contribute to an explanatory framework focused on the features of effectiveness. Concludes that managerial effectiveness is essentially about understanding, reinterpreting and making sense of differing role expectations, which the framework developed will hopefully help in developing.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Qualifying for leadership or control masquerading as enlightenment?

John Milliken

2002 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513550210430237

The 1988 Education Reform Act marked a fundamental shift in direction for the education service and represented a radical shift from the past. One of the major areas of change has been on existing relationships and the subsequent challenge to traditional structures and practices. Responsibilities and accountability have been decentralised to the individual institution. Subsequently this has led to pressure from sources, such as the Government and teaching profession, for a more articulate approach to leadership and management development. In 1990 Handy warned that not all staff are equally experienced or capable of leadership roles. Williams suggested that the position of principal/headteacher is not necessarily the most appropriate for some members of the teaching profession. This paper looks at a proposed initiative for the development of a qualification for headship in general and the implications for implementation in Northern Ireland in particular, and considers it against existing management literature and practice.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Strategies to resolve conflict in partnerships: reflections on UK urban regeneration

John Diamond

2002 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513550210433919

Partnerships to lead on urban regeneration initiatives in the UK claim to facilitate inter‐agency working and local involvement. They are presented both as ways of ensuring the effective management of services within neighbourhoods and as potential “change agents” in the way they bring together different (and sometimes competing) interest groups. Regeneration partnerships are, therefore, often the sites of unresolved conflict. This paper, which draws upon interviews with local regeneration managers and local community representatives in Manchester explores possible strategies for resolving such conflict. In particular it suggests that the use of supervision in the public and community sector needs reforming in order to provide externality for those involved.
journal article
LitStream Collection
New roles for purchasing: researchers, detectives, teachers, doctors and architects

J. Gordon Murray

2002 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513550210430264

Delivering best value for money is accepted as the primary UK public sector purchasing objective and indeed a statutory duty for many in sub‐central government. An investigation of a purchasing unit was carried out which aimed to establish how it sought to achieve best value for money. The investigation reflected a spectrum of five roles that purchasing have taken as “process” experts to assist in the achievement of best value for money, namely, researchers, detectives, teachers, doctors, and architects. The conclusion is that these roles represent a model that can be applied, regardless of sector, by professional purchasing managers as they seek to contribute, in a “hard core/soft core” purchasing structure, to the strategic objectives of their organisation. The paper should be of specific interest to those in the public sector undergoing structural or best value reviews of their purchasing function, seeking to compare and challenge existing approaches.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Bidding to host a major sports event The local organising committee perspective

P.R. Emery

2002 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513550210430255

Major sports events have the potential to offer significant benefits to any city, but at the same time are likely to entail immense resource utilisation and enormous risk. Focussed at the organising committee level, and drawing upon general management and project management literature, aims to collect empirical data to identify current management practice used in the bidding process, and determine key factors in successful bidding. A self‐administered postal questionnaire was sent to 220 randomly selected major sports event organisers from ten different countries. Targeted at the chief executive officer level or equivalent, the questionnaire provided general contextual detail and focussed on present sports event management practices and processes. To gain more in‐depth understanding of successful applications, three semi‐structured interviews were administered in England. The findings reveal that the primary motivations behind local authority involvement are heightening area profile and sport promotion. Successful public sector applications were found to use bounded rational decision‐making, driven largely by political reasoning rather than detailed objective analysis. Specifically identifies and discusses five key factors behind successful national and international governing body approval.
Browse All Journals

Related Journals:

Environmental Claims Journal