Home

Footer

DeepDyve Logo
FacebookTwitter

Features

  • Search and discover articles on DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar
  • Read the full-text of open access and premium content
  • Organize articles with folders and bookmarks
  • Collaborate on and share articles and folders

Info

  • Pricing
  • Enterprise Plans
  • Browse Journals & Topics
  • About DeepDyve

Help

  • Help
  • Publishers
  • Contact Us

Popular Topics

  • COVID-19
  • Climate Change
  • Biopharmaceuticals
Terms |
Privacy |
Security |
Help |
Enterprise Plans |
Contact Us

Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2023 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

International Journal of Public Sector Management

Subject:
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Publisher:
MCB UP Ltd —
Emerald Publishing
ISSN:
0951-3558
Scimago Journal Rank:
61

2023

Volume 36
Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2022

Volume 35
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2021

Volume 34
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Feb)

2020

Volume 34
Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 33
Issue 6/7 (Nov)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 2/3 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

2019

Volume 33
Issue 1 (Nov)
Volume 32
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2018

Volume 31
Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2017

Volume 30
Issue 6-7 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2016

Volume 29
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2015

Volume 28
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 4/5 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2014

Volume 27
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2013

Volume 26
Issue 7 (Sep)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2012

Volume 25
Issue 6/7 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2011

Volume 24
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2010

Volume 23
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2009

Volume 22
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2008

Volume 21
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2007

Volume 20
Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2006

Volume 19
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

2005

Volume 18
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2004

Volume 17
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

2003

Volume 16
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2002

Volume 15
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2001

Volume 14
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2000

Volume 13
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1999

Volume 12
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1998

Volume 11
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 2/3 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1997

Volume 10
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 1/2 (Feb)

1996

Volume 9
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 5/6 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1995

Volume 8
Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1994

Volume 7
Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

1993

Volume 6
Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1992

Volume 5
Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1991

Volume 4
Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1990

Volume 3
Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1989

Volume 2
Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

1988

Volume 1
Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
journal article
LitStream Collection
Strategic issues for higher education strategists in the UK A political contingency perspective

Sarah Richardson; Sonny Nwankwo; Bill Richardson

1995 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513559510099973

Aims to provide a clear rationale as to why customer responsiveness is an essential aspect of an organizational system, focusing specifically on higher education (HE) institutions. Introduces and discusses material from the political contingency and competitive positioning schools of thought. Identifies key strategic issues presently at work in the HE market and explains how and why each of these gives additional power to customers of the HE system and why they thus require HE institutions to become more proactive and effective customer responsiveness systems.
journal article
LitStream Collection
The efficacy of information systems in the public sector Issues of context and culture

Raymond A. Hackney; Neil K. McBride

1995 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513559510099991

In recent years local authorities and hospitals within the UK have been subjected to substantial change, which has resulted in an explosion in the use of information systems (IS). IS managers, personnel and executives within local authorities and hospitals were interviewed in order to determine the effect of context and culture on the take‐up of IS. Context was considered at an external and internal level. Cultural issues were particularly important in the take‐up of IS. In both local authorities and hospitals the IT culture clashed with the subcultures it was supporting. Highlights three issues: the cultural decentralization of IS, which resulted in an unplanned proliferation of disparate systems; the over‐emphasis on operational systems by the IS function to the detriment of management information systems; and the reinforcing of barriers between subcultures through incompatible IS. Suggests that IS departments within the public sector need to be proactive in their support of subcultures and to enrol them in a common goal of the provision of integrated IS within the organization.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Performance evaluation in the Australian public sector The role of management and cost accounting control systems

Patricia Evans; Sheila Bellamy

1995 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513559510100006

At all levels of the Australian public sector, cost constraints, coupled with the adoption of a total quality culture and associated performance evaluation techniques, have turned the attention of senior management away from financial accounting to the management of costs within a strategic framework. Argues that management accounting, planning and control systems can play a leading role in today′s dynamic and challenging public sector environment. Unlike traditional costing systems, which are often historical in focus and price‐based, new costing systems – such as activity‐based costing (ABC) – operate on the premiss that it is the activities and processes undertaken within the organization which add costs and value to the products and services. An ABC system also focuses management′s attention on the underlying causes of costs. However, warns that, in applying total quality management and ABC approaches, it is important to recognize the fundamental differences between the manufacturing industries in which they originated and the service industries which dominate the public sector.
journal article
LitStream Collection
State control and performance evaluation the case of a state‐owned enterprise in China

Kin Cheung Liu

1995 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513559510100015

Attempts to draw a picture on the current practices of performance evaluation of state‐owned enterprises in China by using a case study in Shanghai. Finds that aggregate firm performance was mainly evaluated through the extent of fulfilment of the terms of a contract between the Government and the enterprise concerned. Although the contract is legally binding, it is difficult to sue the Government for non‐performance, because contract terms are loose and the Government, being the superior authority, can easily replace the enterprise management. However, non‐fulfilment of the contract terms on the part of the enterprise did not lead to severe penalties and the rewards were insufficient to have motivational effects. Overall, the evaluation system could be seen as part of the policy of gradualism towards freeing firms, The loose contract terms and the changing economic environment make this system ineffective. Recommends further relaxation of state control over the enterprises for improvement of the effectiveness of the performance evaluation system.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Managing the public sector in Botswana Some emerging constraints and the administrative reform responses

Kempe Ronald Hope Sr

1995 International Journal of Public Sector Management

doi: 10.1108/09513559510100024

In contrast to the past record, there are now significant indications and evidence which suggest that public sector management in Botswana is being constrained by a number of factors. Examines and analyses the primary factors contributing to those constraints and also discusses the administrative reform responses which have been embarked on by the Government of Botswana in its effort to realign the public sector in the national interest.
Browse All Journals

Related Journals:

Environmental Claims Journal