Home

Footer

DeepDyve Logo
FacebookTwitter

Features

  • Search and discover articles on DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar
  • Read the full-text of open access and premium content
  • Organize articles with folders and bookmarks
  • Collaborate on and share articles and folders

Info

  • Pricing
  • Enterprise Plans
  • Browse Journals & Topics
  • About DeepDyve

Help

  • Help
  • Publishers
  • Contact Us

Popular Topics

  • COVID-19
  • Climate Change
  • Biopharmaceuticals
Terms |
Privacy |
Security |
Help |
Enterprise Plans |
Contact Us

Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2023 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

Journal of Applied Entomology

Subject:
Agronomy and Crop Science
Publisher:
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company —
Wiley
ISSN:
0931-2048
Scimago Journal Rank:
65

2023

Volume Early View
SeptemberAugustJulyJune
Volume 147
Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2022

Volume 146
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

2021

Volume 145
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

2020

Volume 144
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

2019

Volume 143
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Jan)

2018

Volume 142
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Jan)Issue 7 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jan)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 1-2 (Jan)

2017

Volume 141
Issue 10 (Jan)Issue 9 (Jan)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

2016

Volume 140
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

2015

Volume 139
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

2014

Volume 138
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

2013

Volume 137
JuneIssue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

2012

Volume 136
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1‐2 (Feb)

2011

Volume 135
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1‐2 (Feb)

2010

Volume 134
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2009

Volume 133
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2008

Volume 132
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2007

Volume 131
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2006

Volume 130
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 6‐7 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2005

Volume 129
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2004

Volume 128
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2003

Volume 127
Issue 9‐10 (Nov)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)

2002

Volume 126
Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 7‐8 (Sep)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 2‐3 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

2001

Volume 125
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1‐2 (Mar)

2000

Volume 124
Issue 9‐10 (Dec)Issue 7‐8 (Oct)Issue 5‐6 (Sep)Issue 3‐4 (Jul)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)

1999

Volume 123
Issue 10 (Jan)Issue 9 (Jan)Issue 8 (Jan)Issue 7 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jan)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

1998

Volume 122
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1997

Volume 121
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1996

Volume 120
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1995

Volume 119
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1994

Volume 118
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)
Volume 117
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1993

Volume 116
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)
Volume 115
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1992

Volume 114
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)
Volume 113
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1991

Volume 112
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)
Volume 111
Issue 1-5 (Jan)

1990

Volume 110
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)
Volume 109
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1989

Volume 108
Issue 1-5 (Jan)
Volume 107
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1988

Volume 106
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)
Volume 105
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1987

Volume 104
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)
Volume 103
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1986

Volume 102
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)
Volume 101
Issue 1‐5 (Jan)

1985

Volume 100
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)
Volume 99
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)

1984

Volume 98
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)
Volume 97
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)

1983

Volume 96
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)
Volume 95
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)

1982

Volume 94
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)
Volume 93
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)

1981

Volume 92
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)
Volume 91
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)

1980

Volume 90
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)
Volume 89
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)

1979

Volume 88
Issue 1‐5 (Dec)

1978

Volume 87
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 86
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 85
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1977

Volume 84
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 83
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1976

Volume 82
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 81
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 80
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1975

Volume 79
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 78
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1974

Volume 77
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 76
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 75
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1973

Volume 74
Issue 1-4 (Dec)
Volume 73
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1972

Volume 72
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 71
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 70
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1971

Volume 69
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 68
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 67
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1970

Volume 65
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1969

Volume 64
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 63
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1968

Volume 62
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 61
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1967

Volume 60
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 59
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1966

Volume 58
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 57
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1965

Volume 56
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1964

Volume 55
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 54
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1963

Volume 53
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 52
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1962

Volume 51
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 50
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1961

Volume 49
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 48
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)

1960

Volume 47
Issue 1‐4 (Dec)
Volume 46
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 45
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1959

Volume 44
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1958

Volume 43
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 42
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1957

Volume 41
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 2‐3 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 40
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1956

Volume 39
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 38
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1955

Volume 37
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1954

Volume 36
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 35
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1953

Volume 34
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1952

Volume 33
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 1‐2 (Dec)

1951

Volume 32
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1950

Volume 31
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1944

Volume 30
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1942

Volume 29
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1941

Volume 28
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 2‐3 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1940

Volume 27
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1939

Volume 26
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
Volume 25
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1938

Volume 24
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1937

Volume 23
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1936

Volume 22
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1935

Volume 21
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1934

Volume 20
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1932

Volume 19
Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)

1931

Volume 18
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)
Volume 17
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1930

Volume 16
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1929

Volume 15
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)
Volume 14
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1928

Volume 13
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1927

Volume 12
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1925

Volume 11
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1924

Volume 10
Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1923

Volume 9
Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1922

Volume 8
Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1921

Volume 7
Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1920

Volume 6
Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1919

Volume 5
Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1918

Volume 4
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1916

Volume 3
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1915

Volume 2
Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

1914

Volume 1
Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)
journal article
LitStream Collection
Identification of fruit fly (Tephritidae) pupae parasitized by hymenoptera parasitoids

Almeida, Tiago Tognolli; Roel, Antonia Railda; Oliveira, Carina Elisei; Rocha, Bruno Fines; Dias, Angélica Maria Penteado Martins

2023 Journal of Applied Entomology

doi: 10.1111/jen.13186

One of the major problems in orchards is the presence of Tephritidae fly maggots, especially in Mirtaceae species. Various biological control tools include the use of Hymenoptera parasitoids, which naturally control fly populations. However, identification of the host species of parasitoids is challenging, because only the puparium remains after the parasitoid hatches. Therefore, the aim of this work was to determine the host species of Hymenoptera parasitoids, through the puparium. Host species were identified by amplification and sequencing of cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COI) of mitochondrial DNA. The results of the present study show that COI DNA sequencing was able to reliably identify host pupae to the genus level, allowing the identification of the Anastrepha genus in this study. This suggests that this method can be used to identify agriculturally relevant hosts through its puparium remains, since this genus has already been described as a pest of Campomanesia adamantium. Knowledge of the species that cause damage to crop is extremely important to study the biological and ecological aspects of these pests and their control. In this way, our results suggest that this method can be used to identify economically relevant host pupal species since the genus identified in this study has already been described as a pest of C. adamantium.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Volatiles of the trap crop sunflowers: Effects on the behaviour of adult female Conogethes punctiferalis moths

Zhou, Jia; Chen, Li‐Lin; Zhu, Yu‐Tong; Siemann, Evan; Wan, Nian‐Feng

2023 Journal of Applied Entomology

doi: 10.1111/jen.13185

Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) are potential trap crops to attract the yellow peach moth (Conogethes punctiferalis) in orchards but the volatile compounds released from sunflowers and their effects on C. punctiferalis behaviour are not clear. Here we used solid phase micro‐extraction to collect volatiles released from flower disks of sunflowers, identified them by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, and examined the attractiveness of some of the compounds to mated female adult C. punctiferalis moths in Y‐tube olfactometer choice tests. We detected nine volatile compounds (α‐Pinene, β‐Phellandrene, Camphene, β‐Pinene, 3‐Carene, D‐Limonene, Eucalyptol, γ‐Terpinen, and Valencene) with consistently large peak areas for α‐Pinene and β‐Phellandrene. Among tested volatiles, both α‐Pinene and β‐Phellandrene were attractive to C. punctiferalis in olfactometer tests but this was only significant for higher concentrations of β‐Phellandrene. This suggests that β‐Phellandrene may promote C. punctiferalis oviposition on sunflower disks. This study provides insights into volatile chemical mediated responses of insect herbivores to trap crops.
journal article
LitStream Collection
Modelling potential distribution of Tuta absoluta in China under climate change using CLIMEX and MaxEnt

Zhao, Jinyu; Ma, Li; Song, Chengfei; Xue, Zengsheng; Zheng, Ruirui; Yan, Xizhong; Hao, Chi

2023 Journal of Applied Entomology

doi: 10.1111/jen.13181

The Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) originated in South America and is a major pest of the economically critical solanaceous crops. It is devastating to tomatoes, attacking mainly the leaves, stems, flowers and fruits of tomato plants, and can cause up to 100% damage. T. absoluta invaded China in 2017 and expanded rapidly, severely impacting the tomato industry. To illustrate the detailed potential distribution of T. absoluta in China, we used CLIMEX and MaxEnt models to predict the potential distribution of this pest using historical and future climate data. CLIMEX predicts a wider potential distribution area for T. absoluta in China than MaxEnt, which suggests that most of China is suitable for its distribution, except for the Tarim Basin in southern Xinjiang, western Inner Mongolia and northwestern Gansu. Both models accurately predicted the known distribution of T. absoluta in the provinces of Yunnan and Guangxi, and the predictions by both models suggest the total distribution range of T. absoluta in China is to increase slightly with future changes in climate temperature. These predictions will help understand the influence of climate change on the potential distribution of T. absoluta in China and thus provide a theoretical foundation for developing early monitoring, quarantine and control strategies.
journal article
Open Access Collection
A novel protein‐based fruit fly trap in melon flies Bactrocera cucurbitae for effective pest control management

McCracken, Andrew W.; Niazy, Nurah; Turi, Samu; Arya, Vijeth; Kempraj, Vivek; Morimoto, Juliano

2023 Journal of Applied Entomology

doi: 10.1111/jen.13184

Agriculture remains a major source of subsistence for local communities in India. However, agricultural yield can be strongly affected by agricultural pest outbreaks. This can result in economic losses for small‐scale farmers who already experience socio‐economic challenges, such as lack of appropriate infrastructure and subsides. Sophisticated pest management techniques (e.g. sterile insect technique) are less accessible to small farmers in developing countries, and therefore, alternative cost‐effective approaches for pest management are needed. Here, we report our findings of a 3‐year field trial (2018–2020) in India, which was designed to test for the potential effectiveness of a novel, slow‐release formulation protein‐based trap, compared to standard Cuelure traps against melon flies Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). Protein‐bait traps can attract flies from both sexes (as opposed to male‐only, chemical traps), bearing the potential to have a greater long‐term impact on pest populations by decreasing future reproductive potential of trapped individuals. We found that, despite uneven sampling efforts, Cuelure had overall higher trapping performance, while protein‐bait traps, despite trapping at lower efficiency, were equally effective for trapping males and females. Simulations with our field data revealed that protein‐bait traps can have an ‘inclusive’ advantage by trapping females and thereby preventing future individuals. Overall, our study highlights the potential benefits of using this alternative trapping technique to supplement pest management in developing countries.
Browse All Journals

Related Journals:

Industrial Crops and ProductsAgronomy JournalAnnals of Applied BiologyAgriculture and Human ValuesJournal of NematologyPlant Production ScienceAgronomyExperimental AgricultureWeed Biology and ManagementSugar Tech