Vascular cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19 and RNA viral pathogens: a systematic reviewKarch, Jamie L; Okorie, Chiamaka L; Maymone, Mayra B C; Laughter, Melissa; Vashi, Neelam A
doi: 10.1093/ced/llad377pmid: 37936304
BackgroundCOVID-19, the widely recognized and highly contagious respiratory tract infection, has had a substantial impact on the field of dermatology since its emergence in 2019. SARS-CoV-2, the causative virus of COVID-19, is classified as an RNA virus. Various skin-related symptoms have been reported in patients with COVID-19, most notably the distinctive purple–red acral rash resembling chilblain lesions, commonly referred to as ‘COVID toe’; similarly, skin-related symptoms have been observed in connection with other RNA viruses.ObjectivesTo explore the relationship between RNA viruses and their associated vascular cutaneous manifestations vs. those observed in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed and medical subject heading terms related to RNA viruses and related skin manifestations.ResultsIn total, 3994 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 presenting with skin rashes were included. Chilblain-like lesions were most frequently observed (30.2%), followed by erythematous maculopapular/morbilliform rashes (9.1%) and urticarial rashes (4.7%). Of 8362 patients diagnosed with RNA viruses, more than half of the skin findings reported were erythematous/maculopapular/morbilliform rashes (52.3%), followed by unspecified (11.3%) and purpuric rashes (10.6%).ConclusionsWhen comparing RNA viral infections with COVID-19 infection, we observed similarities in the reported skin manifestations and their presumed pathways, with many implicated in the proinflammatory response. Owing to the wide range of cutaneous symptoms associated with RNA viruses and our currently limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms, additional research is warranted to investigate the pathology behind viral-induced skin lesions.
Efficacy and safety of calcipotriol as a potential topical treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, controlled, triple blinded, split-face clinical trialMahran, Ayman; Ghazally, Alaa; Ali, Ali Saleh; Bakr, Radwa M
doi: 10.1093/ced/llad371pmid: 37925677
BackgroundAcne vulgaris is a common skin problem that may result in significant scarring and systemic comorbidities. Adverse effects and increasing resistance to available treatments urge the development of new therapeutics. Topical vitamin D analogues have been successfully used in psoriasis; however, the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol as a potential topical treatment of acne is yet to be established.ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol in treating acne compared with adapalene and placebo.MethodsSixty patients with acne were included and randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Group I participants were treated by daily application of calcipotriol 0.005% cream on one facial side vs. placebo (petrolatum) over the other side. Group II were treated by daily application of adapalene 0.1% gel over one facial side vs. calcipotriol on the other. Therapeutic response was evaluated using the Japanese Acne Grading System (JAGS) and through photographic evaluation using Mean Improvement Score by Physician.ResultsAdapalene-treated skin gave the greatest improvement and the highest patient satisfaction compared with skin treated with calcipotriol or placebo (P = 0.001). Nonetheless, the calcipotriol-treated side showed a significantly greater reduction in post-treatment JAGS score and much greater satisfaction than placebo. As treatment continued, improved tolerability to calcipotriol was noted, with comparable side-effects between the three study arms.ConclusionsCalcipotriol seems to be a promising new safe topical therapeutic option for acne. However, adapalene is still superior in efficacy, tolerability and patient satisfaction.
Delusional infestation treated with risperidone: a series of 27 patientsGuedes, Nycolle L K O; Dwan, Alexandre J; Gerlero, Paula; Nico, Marcello M S
doi: 10.1093/ced/llad411pmid: 38001055
BackgroundPatients with delusional infestation (DI) frequently refuse to be treated with psychoactive drugs. In the past, pimozide was commonly used as a first-line agent but is now prescribed more rarely. Risperidone was first used to treat DI in 1995. A recent review identified 12 studies that evaluated the use of risperidone in 43 patients with DI.ObjectivesTo study the characteristics of and therapeutic results in patients with DI treated with risperidone at a university medical centre in São Paulo, Brazil.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients with DI treated with risperidone at a dermatological university clinic since 2016. Records were reviewed for personal data and findings related to treatment.ResultsTwenty-seven patients were studied (20 women and 7 men). The maintenance dose of risperidone varied from 1 mg three times weekly to 8 mg daily. Control of symptoms was achieved in the majority of patients. A reduction in dosage due to side-effects was seen in four patients; risperidone had to be switched to another antipsychotic in three cases, despite a good response. Only one patient did not respond to risperidone.ConclusionsRisperidone is an effective, well-tolerated and safe treatment for delusional parasitosis. Adequate follow-up is mandatory in order to obtain long-term control of symptoms.