journal article
LitStream Collection
Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
Mller, Christian H.; Penninga, Luit; Wetterslev, Jrn; Steinbrchel, Daniel A.; Gluud, Christian
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn335pmid: 18628261
AimsTo assess the clinical outcomes of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in randomized trials.Methods and resultsWe searched electronic databases and bibliographies until June 2007. Trials were assessed for risk of bias. Outcome measures were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and renewed coronary revascularization at maximum follow-up. We applied trial sequential analysis to estimate the strength of evidence. We found 66 randomized trials. There was no statistically significant differences regarding mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.98; 95 confidence interval (CI) 0.661.44], myocardial infarction (RR 0.95; 95 CI 0.651.37), or renewed coronary revascularization (RR 1.34; 95 CI 0.832.18). We found a significant reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (RR 0.69; 95 CI 0.570.83) and stroke (RR 0.53; 95 CI 0.310.91) in off-pump patients. However, when continuity correction for zero-event trials was included, the reduction in stroke became insignificant (RR 0.62; 95 CI 0.321.19). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated overwhelming evidence supporting that off-pump bypass surgery reduces atrial fibrillation.ConclusionOff-pump surgery reduces the risks of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared with on-pump surgery. For death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and renewed coronary revascularization, the evidence is still weak and more low-bias risk trials are needed.