Orthogonal procrustes rotation maximizing congruenceBrokken, Frank B.
doi: 10.1007/bf02293679pmid: N/A
Abstract Procedures for assessing the invariance of factors found in data sets using different subjects and the same variables are often using the least squares criterion, which appears to be too restrictive for comparing factors. Tucker's coefficient of congruence, on the other hand, is more closely related to the human interpretation of factorial invariance than the least squares criterion. A method maximizing simultaneously the sum of coefficients of congruence between two matrices of factor loadings, using orthogonal rotation of one matrix is presented. As shown in examples, the sum of coefficients of congruence obtained using the presented rotation procedure is slightly higher than the sum of coefficients of congruence using Orthogonal Procrustes Rotation based on the least squares criterion.
Tau-equivalence and equipercentile equatingYen, Wendy M.
doi: 10.1007/bf02293680pmid: N/A
Abstract Test scores that are not perfectly reliable cannot be strictly equated unless they are strictly parallel [Lord, 1980]. This fact implies that tau-equivalence can be lost if an equipercentile equating is applied to observed scores that are not strictly parallel. Seventy-two simulated testing conditions are produced to simulate equating tests with different difficulties and discriminations. Number-correct and trait metrics are examined. When an equipercentile equating is applied to these data, locally biased (i.e., non-tau-equivalent) results are produced for tests of unequal difficulty. Differences between the criteria of tau-equivalence and equipercentile equivalence are discussed.
Alternative weights and invariant parameters in optimal scalingMcDonald, Roderick P.
doi: 10.1007/bf02293682pmid: N/A
Abstract Under conditions that are commonly satisfied in optimal scaling problems, arbitrary sets of optimal weights can be obtained by choices of generalized inverse procedures. A simple relationship holds between these and the corresponding invariant item scores. The case of optimal scaling originally treated by Guttman [1941] yields a restricted form of multicategory factor analysis. It is suggested that the invariant parameters of optimal scaling should be interpreted, according to the principles of latent trait theory, rather than the arbitrary weights.
Multidimensional scaling models for reaction times and same-different judgmentsTakane, Yoshio;Sergent, Justine
doi: 10.1007/bf02293683pmid: N/A
Abstract A method for joint analysis of reaction times and same-different judgments is discussed. A set of stimuli is assumed to have some parametric representation which uniquely defines dissimilarities between the stimuli. Those dissimilarities are then related to the observed reaction times and same-different judgments through a model of psychological processes. Three representation models of dissimilarities are considered, the Minkowski power distance model, the linear model, and Tversky's feature matching model. Maximum likelihood estimation procedures are developed and implemented in the form of a FORTRAN program. An example is given to illustrate the kind of analyses that can be performed by the proposed method.
Ordinal data, ordered scale points, and order statisticsVijn, Pieter
doi: 10.1007/bf02293685pmid: N/A
Abstract This paper concerns ordinal responses. An ordered Dirichlet distribution describes prior and posterior beliefs about the cumulative probabilities of response categories. Associating the response categories with intervals of a latent random variable then induces a distribution on the order statistics of that variable. The psychometrician can use the asymptotic theory of order statistics to learn how distributional assumptions about the latent variable effect inference. An example relates the skewness of a latent variable to the proportional odds and proportional hazards models of McCullagh [1980].
Univariate repeated measures techniques applied to multivariate dataThomas, D. Roland
doi: 10.1007/bf02293686pmid: N/A
Abstract Repeated measures designs in psychology have traditionally been analyzed by the univariate mixed model approach, in which the repeated measures effect is tested against an error term based on the subject by treatment interaction. This paper considers the extension of this analysis to designs in which the individual repeated measures are multivariate. Sufficient conditions for a valid multivariate mixed model analysis are given, and a test is described to determine whether or not given data satisfy these conditions.