Air in the Middle of the AbdomenCatena, Fausto; Di Saverio, Salomone
doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm0804366pmid: 20979466
A 66-year-old man presented with a 20-day history of constipation, lower abdominal and back pain, and fever. Two days before admission, his symptoms worsened, with nausea and passing flatus but not stool. The patient's medical history included acute diverticulitis that was managed conservatively. The abdomen was soft and slightly distended, with mild tenderness in the lower quadrants. The laboratory results showed leukocytosis (white-cell count, 10,890 per cubic millimeter). Plain radiography showed a large air bubble (>10 cm in diameter) centrally located in the abdomen (Panel A). Urgent abdominal computed tomography (CT), without the use of contrast medium, suggested that the . . .
The Midterm Elections — High Stakes for Health PolicyAaron, Henry J.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011213pmid: 20925535
The stakes for health policy in the 2010 congressional elections are higher than they have ever been. The political parties are polarized. Policy divisions are deep. The challenges of implementingthe Affordable Care Act (ACA) are enormous. The outcome of the 2010 congressional elections may well determine whether this landmark legislation succeeds or fails. Whatever the electoral outcome, the political battle over health care reform will continue into the 2012 presidential elections and probably beyond. The evidence of party polarization is overwhelming (see table).1 A majority of both parties ended up voting for the original Social Security Act, although Republicans had . . .
Resurrection of a Stem-Cell Funding Barrier — Dickey–Wicker in CourtAnnas, George J.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1010466pmid: 20979467
Embryo research was born political. Expressions of shock and surprise at the August 23 ruling of federal district court judge Royce Lamberth enjoining federal funding of stem-cell research — which was based largely on his reading of an amendment to an appropriations bill — are thus not terribly persuasive.1 The amendment, known as the Dickey–Wicker amendment, provides that no federal funds can be expended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for “(1) the creation of a human embryo or embryos for research purposes; or (2) research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected . . .
Why Health Care Is Going HomeLanders, Steven H.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1000401pmid: 20961239
In Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Buffalo, New York,1 acutely ill patients have been sent out of the emergency department for hospital-like care at home. In Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and Little Rock, Arkansas, home health agencies provide chronic care management services, emphasizing care coordination and support for patients' management of their own conditions. In San Diego, California, physicians arrive at patients' homes with a new version of the black bag that includes a mobile x-ray machine and a device that can perform more than 20 laboratory tests at the point of care. Several engineering and electronics companies have developed products for . . .