LettersAllen, S. C.; Cunningham, G.; Farrell, J. H.; Dickmann, D. I.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.6.1apmid: N/A
environmental management, forest, forest management, forest resources, forestry, forestry research, forestry science, natural resources, natural resource management This content is only available as a PDF. © 2003 Society of American Foresters
Fuel Reduction Strategies in Forest Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis of Public SupportShindler, B.; Toman, E.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.6.8pmid: N/A
This study uses panel data from a mail survey administered to the same individuals in 1996 and 2000 to measure change in public attitudes toward fire management programs on federal lands in eastern Oregon and Washington. Findings were generally similar between 1996 and 2000, but three noteworthy changes occurred over the four-year interval. First, the number of citizens who view smoke as a problem has risen. Second, citizens gave Forest Service information programs lower ratings and considered other sources of information more reliable. And finally, the relationship between the Forest Service and residents in the region appears to have eroded. Nevertheless, respondents continued to support prescribed fire and mechanized thinning for fuel reduction purposes in local forests.
Stakeholders' Perceptions of Parcelization in Wisconsin's NorthwoodsRickenbach, M. G.; Gobster, P. H.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.6.18pmid: N/A
Parcelization, the process by which relatively large forest ownerships become subdivided into smaller ones, is often related to changes in ownership and can bring changes to the use of the land. Landowners, resource professionals, and others interested in Wisconsin's Northwoods were asked their views on parcelization in a series of stakeholder forums. We analyzed their statements through the lens of forest sustainability with its ecological, economic, and social dimensions. The analysis shows how sustainability might be used to structure future research and discourse within local communities to foster fuller considerations of landscape and land use change.
PVF: A Scale to Measure Public Values of ForestsTarrant, M. A.; Warnell, Daniel B.; Cordell, H. K.; Green, G. T.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.6.24pmid: N/A
We propose a 12-point scale for measuring the relative importance of national forest resources–both economic and noneconomic–to the American public. With data from the National Survey on Recreation and the Environment, the scale supports the existence of three latent factors: protection, amenity, and outputs. The scale had moderate levels of internal reliability and demonstrated predictive validity. Consistent with previous studies of forest values, protection values were significantly higher for women, urban residents, and younger respondents. Future research should investigate the use and nonuse values of both the economic and noneconomic factors, because decisions that fail to include economic nonuse values in benefit-cost analyses may underestimate the total value of forest preservation. By understanding the forest values that people hold, forest planners and managers will be better able to design policies, reduce conflicts among stakeholders, and implement forest plans.
Integrated Graduate Education and Research in Neotropical Working ForestsZarin, D. J.; Kainer, K. A.; Putz, F. E.; Schmink, M.; Jacobson, S. K.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.6.31pmid: N/A
The paucity of adequately educated leaders hampers programs in international forestry and sustainable development, where an ability to function effectively across cultures and disciplines is a prerequisite for success. With support from the National Science Foundation, the University of Florida is launching a graduate education and research program focused on neotropical working forests. The program offers an interdisciplinary curriculum to train doctoral students to research the tradeoffs and complementarities among working forest options, the effectiveness of different kinds of working forests for conservation and development, and efforts to promote forest management and conservation in neotropical regions. Increasing the ability of both the University of Florida and participating Latin American institutions to conduct truly collaborative, interdisciplinary research and training is an explicit program goal.
Restoring Dignity to Sound Professional JudgmentHaas, G.E.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.6.38pmid: N/A
Both the scientific community and the judiciary make decisions based on less than complete information, and both acknowledge the reality of uncertainty. The scientific community tends to view certainty as a yes-no phenomenon, demands a high degree of certainty, and considers only several variables at one time. The judiciary, however, uses a sliding scale of certainty, allows a lower degree of certainty, and considers the totality of the situation. For natural resource decisionmakers–people with scientific training whose decisions are subject to judicial review–what should the standard of judgment be? This article examines certainty from both perspectives, argues for the restoration of sound professional judgment as the standard for natural resource decisionmaking, and offers suggestions to improve sound professional judgment.
Restoring Dignity to Sound Professional JudgmentHaas, G. E.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.6.38pmid: N/A
Both the scientific community and the judiciary make decisions based on less than complete information, and both acknowledge the reality of uncertainty. The scientific community tends to view certainty as a yes-no phenomenon, demands a high degree of certainty, and considers only several variables at one time. The judiciary, however, uses a sliding scale of certainty, allows a lower degree of certainty, and considers the totality of the situation. For natural resource decisionmakers–people with scientific training whose decisions are subject to judicial review–what should the standard of judgment be? This article examines certainty from both perspectives, argues for the restoration of sound professional judgment as the standard for natural resource decisionmaking, and offers suggestions to improve sound professional judgment.
How, Thanks to a Decision Support System Called “Profiling,” a Forest Manager Saved His Forest But Lost His Job: A FableLundquist, J. E.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.6.44pmid: N/A
Efficient and effective forest disease management relies on good research, yet forest managers are sometimes slow at adapting and implementing research discoveries. Meaningful research on management issues relies on an understanding of the difficulties of management, yet research discoveries often are remotely applicable to day-to-day management decisions. This communications gap may constrain the science and application of forest disease management. A fictional case study examines the incongruence between a new-economy manager and an old-economy corporate office when a decision support system called “profiling” is used to solve an ecological problem in an economic context. It illustrates the risks managers take when implementing new technologies–in this case, using information technology in a forest business when a root disease limits timber production. In the story that follows, our narrator is attending a guest lecture.