The Journal of Experimental Education

O'Donnell, Angela M.; Dansereau, Donald F.

doi: 10.1080/00220970009598497pmid: N/A

Abstract The purpose of the experiment was to determine the separate and combined effects of varied learning materials (knowledge maps or texts) and teaching props (overview maps or outlines) on the learning of 2 different sets of material within the context of cooperative teaching. The participants were assigned to 1 of 4 cooperative teaching groups that used knowledge maps or texts as study materials, teaching props, or both. Each dyad studied material on probability theory (PT) and on the autonomic nervous system (ANS). One participant was responsible for teaching 1 set of material and was the learner for the other set of material. The teachers significantly outperformed the learners on measures of recall that included content and organization. The effects of format of the study materials or communication props depended on the prior knowledge of the participants. Format of the materials affected scores on organization for the PT passage but affected the content of the recall of the ANS passage. The results of the experiment delineated some of the conditions under which knowledge maps and texts are effective as learning or teaching tools.

Katayama, Andrew D.; Robinson, Daniel H.

doi: 10.1080/00220970009598498pmid: N/A

Abstract Encoding benefits (DiVesta & Gray, 1972) of graphic-organizer and outline note-taking using spaced study and review (Robinson, Katayama, Dubois, & DeVaney, 1998) were investigated. In 2 40-min periods separated by 2 days, 117 undergraduates studied a chapter-length text along with a set of complete, partial, or skeletal graphic organizers or outlines. Two days later, the students reviewed their materials for 10 min and then completed factual and application tests. On the factual test, there was no effect for either study notes or amount of information. However, on the application test, graphic organizers were better than outlines and partial notes were better than complete notes. Having students take notes using partial graphic organizers may be preferable to giving them complete notes because of encoding benefits.

Kazelskis, Richard; Reeves, Carolyn; Kersh, M. E.; Bailey, Gahan; Cole, Katherine; Larmon, Marilyn; Hall, Lew; Holliday, D. C.

doi: 10.1080/00220970009598499pmid: N/A

Abstract The authors used correlational and confirmatory factor analytic techniques to examine the relationship between measures of the constructs of mathematics anxiety and test anxiety. The correlations found between measures of the 2 constructs were nearly as high as those found within measures of the 2 constructs, bringing into question the separateness of the constructs. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis provided some support for a distinction between the constructs; the correlation between the 2 factors, however, was relatively high. Those findings suggest that mathematics anxiety and test anxiety may be separate phenomena; the conceptual uniqueness of mathematics anxiety, however, needs to be further delineated and its measurement improved.

Cheung, Derek

doi: 10.1080/00220970009598500pmid: N/A

Abstract Although curriculum scholars generally agree that teachers' meta-orientations to curriculum are hidden forces guiding their selection of curriculum goals, curriculum content, teaching methods, and assessment strategies, the existence of such a meta-orientation construct has not been empirically confirmed. The author used McNeil's (1996) 4 curriculum orientations to demonstrate how hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis can be applied to measure the meta-orientation construct. A hierarchical model was hypothesized that consisted of 4 1st-order factors and 1 2nd-order factor. The 1st-order factors represented McNeil's 4 separate curriculum orientations: academic, social reconstructionist, humanistic, and technological. The 2nd-order factor denoted the meta-orientation construct. Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of teacher data collected by a curriculum orientation inventory provided clear support for the hypothesized model.

Macmillan, Peter D.

doi: 10.1080/00220970009598501pmid: N/A

Abstract Classical test theory (CTT), generalizability theory (GT), and multi-faceted Rasch model (MFRM) approaches to detecting and correcting for rater variability were compared. Each of 4,930 students' responses on an English examination was graded on 9 scales by 3 raters drawn from a pool of 70. CTT and MFRM indicated substantial variation among raters; the MFRM analysis identified far more raters as different than the CTT analysis did. In contrast, the GT rater variance component and the Rasch histograms suggested little rater variation. CTT and MFRM correction procedures both produced different scores for more than 50% of the examinees, but 75% of the examinees received identical results after each correction. The demonstrated value of a correction for systems of well-trained multiple graders has implications for all systems in which subjective scoring is used.