Community Development Journal

Tony McCall

doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.96pmid: N/A

Community economic development models (CEDM) have become the latest fashion in the field of regional development policy . However, CEDM means different things to different people, including institutional building at the community level, economic development in a specific geographical area, bottom‐up rather than top‐down development or the development of a community enterprise . This paper focuses on the most contentious aspect of this approach to regional development policy – capacity and opportunity – in order to draw some conclusions and recommendations about the viability of CEDM for regional communities. It draws on research literature from Canada and Australia to inform this debate. Copyright Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal 2003 « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article Community Dev J (2003) 38 (2): 96-108. doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.96 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McCall, T. Search for related content Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue October 2015 50 (4) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Publishers' Books for Review Rights & Permissions Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Journals Career Network Editor Professor Mick Carpenter View full editorial board Impact Factor: 1.174 For Authors Instructions to authors Online Submission Instructions Submit Now! Author Self-Archiving Policy P56qQ0myhZIZ9qtHtIIeI0jcYDo8lVt6 true Looking for your next opportunity? Looking for jobs... jQuery_1_11 = jQuery.noConflict(true); Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements

G. R. Walter

doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.109pmid: N/A

This paper discusses community economic development when communities discover that market‐based growth is not providing economic security. This situation typically arises when market forces turn against a community . A process‐discursive methodology is suggested as a way forward. This is in contrast with prescriptions for growth based on allegedly scientific economic analysis. These prescriptions necessarily emphasize restoring market success by policies such as greater savings or enhanced entrepreneurship, policies that reflect the economist's professional socialization. Copyright Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal 2003 « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article Community Dev J (2003) 38 (2): 109-119. doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.109 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Walter, G. R. Search for related content Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue October 2015 50 (4) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Publishers' Books for Review Rights & Permissions Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Journals Career Network Editor Professor Mick Carpenter View full editorial board Impact Factor: 1.174 For Authors Instructions to authors Online Submission Instructions Submit Now! Author Self-Archiving Policy P56qQ0myhZIZ9qtHtIIeI0jcYDo8lVt6 true Looking for your next opportunity? Looking for jobs... jQuery_1_11 = jQuery.noConflict(true); Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements

Gwenelle S. O'Neal, Rondald A. O'Neal

doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.120pmid: N/A

In this paper, indicators are examined that relate to agency participation in an empowerment zone in a northeastern city of the United States. This study has descriptive and analytic objectives. The descriptive component delineates the nature of services within a designated community and the agency focus on empowerment. The primary analytic objective is to identify key predictors of agency participation in the Empowerment Zone (EZ) planning activities. This paper will present findings of agency participation in an empowerment zone and identify challenges to community development professionals. Copyright Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal 2003 « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article Community Dev J (2003) 38 (2): 120-129. doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.120 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Neal, G. S. Articles by O'Neal, R. A. Search for related content Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue October 2015 50 (4) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Publishers' Books for Review Rights & Permissions Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Journals Career Network Editor Professor Mick Carpenter View full editorial board Impact Factor: 1.174 For Authors Instructions to authors Online Submission Instructions Submit Now! Author Self-Archiving Policy P56qQ0myhZIZ9qtHtIIeI0jcYDo8lVt6 true Looking for your next opportunity? Looking for jobs... jQuery_1_11 = jQuery.noConflict(true); Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements

Loraine Blaxter, Richard Farnell, Jane Watts

doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.130pmid: N/A

This paper considers aspects of the UK government agenda for neighbourhood renewal and suggests that the agenda contains a number of ambiguities and contradictions. These present particular problems for the development of partnerships between local government and community sector organizations. We profile the significance of creating a learning culture in such partnerships as an essential for coping with these problems and making the most of the opportunities to tackle social exclusion and encourage active citizenship. Our experience of Action Learning for Local Development, a European Social Fund ‘employability’ project in the city of Coventry, is the lens of experience and reflection through which these issues are explored. Copyright Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal 2003 « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article Community Dev J (2003) 38 (2): 130-139. doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.130 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Blaxter, L. Articles by Watts, J. Search for related content Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue October 2015 50 (4) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Publishers' Books for Review Rights & Permissions Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Journals Career Network Editor Professor Mick Carpenter View full editorial board Impact Factor: 1.174 For Authors Instructions to authors Online Submission Instructions Submit Now! Author Self-Archiving Policy P56qQ0myhZIZ9qtHtIIeI0jcYDo8lVt6 true Looking for your next opportunity? Looking for jobs... jQuery_1_11 = jQuery.noConflict(true); Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements

Betty Claire Mubangizi

doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.140pmid: N/A

This article examines, within a livelihoods framework , what social capital does for communities living in rural areas and the potential it holds for improving rural living conditions. It concludes by making suggestions on how this all‐important form of capital can be drawn upon and fully utilized to fast track the fight against poverty through community economic development , and promote sustainable livelihoods. It is hoped that the information summarized in this article will be helpful to agencies implementing community development initiatives or attempting to conduct research in the field. Copyright Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal 2003 « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article Community Dev J (2003) 38 (2): 140-150. doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.140 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mubangizi, B. C. Search for related content Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue October 2015 50 (4) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Publishers' Books for Review Rights & Permissions Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Journals Career Network Editor Professor Mick Carpenter View full editorial board Impact Factor: 1.174 For Authors Instructions to authors Online Submission Instructions Submit Now! Author Self-Archiving Policy P56qQ0myhZIZ9qtHtIIeI0jcYDo8lVt6 true Looking for your next opportunity? Looking for jobs... jQuery_1_11 = jQuery.noConflict(true); Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements

Ernest Chui

doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.151pmid: N/A

This article argues that ‘ community eclipse’ theorized by Chicago ecological sociologists is not caused ‘naturally’, but by the constellation of economic, socio‐cultural and political factors. Hong Kong, a former British colony, has undergone urbanization ‐cum‐industrialization and experienced a demise of community spirit. Industrialization set the stage for urbanization , while the property‐led economy spurred unscrupulous urban renewal. Government public housing and new town policies spurred urban sprawl, disrupted pre‐existent communities and uprooted the residents. The local people attended to ‘capitalistic consciousness’ and pragmatic concerns rather than communitarian precepts. Social capital should be nurtured in revitalizing the eclipsed communities. Copyright Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal 2003 « Previous | Next Article » Table of Contents This Article Community Dev J (2003) 38 (2): 151-163. doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.151 » Abstract Free Full Text (PDF) Free Classifications Article Services Article metrics Alert me when cited Alert me if corrected Find similar articles Similar articles in Web of Science Add to my archive Download citation Request Permissions Citing Articles Load citing article information Citing articles via CrossRef Citing articles via Scopus Citing articles via Web of Science Citing articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chui, E. Search for related content Related Content Load related web page information Share Email this article CiteULike Delicious Facebook Google+ Mendeley Twitter What's this? Search this journal: Advanced » Current Issue October 2015 50 (4) Alert me to new issues The Journal About this journal Publishers' Books for Review Rights & Permissions Dispatch date of the next issue We are mobile – find out more This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Journals Career Network Editor Professor Mick Carpenter View full editorial board Impact Factor: 1.174 For Authors Instructions to authors Online Submission Instructions Submit Now! Author Self-Archiving Policy P56qQ0myhZIZ9qtHtIIeI0jcYDo8lVt6 true Looking for your next opportunity? Looking for jobs... jQuery_1_11 = jQuery.noConflict(true); Alerting Services Email table of contents Email Advance Access CiteTrack XML RSS feed Corporate Services Advertising sales Reprints Supplements

George, Vincent

doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.164pmid: N/A

Hinshelwood, Emily

doi: 10.1093/cdj/38.2.166pmid: N/A