Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    British Journal of Surgery

    Subject:
    Surgery
    Publisher:
    BJS Society — Oxford University Press
    ISSN:
    0007-1323
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    210

    2026

    Volume 113
    Supplement 6 (Jul)Supplement 5 (Jun)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2025

    Volume 113
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 112
    Supplement 17 (Dec)Supplement 16 (Dec)Supplement 15 (Dec)Supplement 14 (Nov)Supplement 13 (Aug)Supplement 12 (Aug)Supplement 11 (Aug)Supplement 10 (Jun)Supplement 9 (May)Supplement 8 (May)Supplement 7 (May)Supplement 6 (Mar)Supplement 5 (Feb)Supplement 4 (Feb)Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Jan)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2024

    Volume 112
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 111
    Supplement 9 (Nov)Supplement 8 (Sep)Supplement 7 (Aug)Supplement 6 (Jul)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2023

    Volume 111
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 110
    Supplement 10 (Dec)Supplement 9 (Dec)Supplement 8 (Nov)Supplement 7 (Aug)Supplement 6 (Aug)Supplement 5 (Jun)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)

    2022

    Volume 110
    Issue 9 (Dec)Issue 8 (Dec)Issue 7 (Nov)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 109
    Supplement 9 (Dec)Supplement 8 (Nov)Supplement 7 (Oct)Supplement 6 (Aug)Supplement 5 (Aug)Supplement 4 (Jul)Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Jun)Issue 9 (May)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)

    2021

    Volume 109
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 108
    Supplement 9 (Dec)Supplement 8 (Nov)Supplement 7 (Oct)Supplement 6 (Oct)Supplement 5 (Jul)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Apr)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (May)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Mar)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2020

    Volume 108
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 107
    Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 13 (Sep)Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Jul)Issue 9 (Jun)Issue 8 (Apr)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Feb)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2019

    Volume 106
    Supplement 7 (Nov)Supplement 6 (Sep)Supplement 5 (Sep)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Mar)Supplement 2 (Feb)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Jul)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume 105
    Supplement 6 (Nov)Supplement 5 (Aug)Supplement 4 (Jul)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2017

    Volume 104
    Supplement 7 (Sep)Supplement 6 (Jul)Supplement 5 (Jun)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Jan)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2016

    Volume 103
    Supplement 7 (Sep)Supplement 6 (Aug)Supplement 5 (Jul)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Feb)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Aug)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2015

    Volume 102
    Supplement 7 (Sep)Supplement 6 (May)Supplement 5 (Apr)Supplement 4 (Mar)Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Feb)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2014

    Volume 102
    Supplement 1 (Dec)
    Volume 101
    Supplement 6 (Nov)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (Apr)Supplement 3 (Feb)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2013

    Volume 100
    Supplement 8 (Sep)Supplement 7 (Jul)Supplement 6 (Jun)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (Apr)Supplement 3 (Mar)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2012

    Volume 99
    Supplement 7 (Jul)Supplement 6 (Jun)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (Apr)Supplement 3 (Feb)Supplement 2 (Feb)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2011

    Volume 99
    Supplement 1 (Dec)
    Volume 98
    Supplement 8 (Nov)Supplement 7 (Oct)Supplement 6 (Jun)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (Apr)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2010

    Volume 98
    Supplement 1 (Dec)
    Volume 97
    Supplement 6 (Nov)Supplement 5 (Dec)Supplement 4 (Jun)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 96
    Supplement 6 (Oct)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2008

    Volume 95
    Supplement 7 (Aug)Supplement 6 (May)Supplement 4 (Jul)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2007

    Volume 94
    Supplement 5 (Aug)Supplement 3 (Jul)Supplement 2 (Apr)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2006

    Volume 93
    Supplement 3 (Sep)Supplement 2 (Jan)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 4
    Issue 14 (Mar)

    2005

    Volume 92
    Supplement 1 (Apr)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 80
    Issue 3 (Dec)
    Volume 68
    Issue 10 (Dec)
    Volume 67
    Issue 6 (Dec)
    Volume 66
    Issue 4 (Dec)
    Volume 64
    Issue 7 (Dec)
    Volume 61
    Issue 6 (Dec)
    Volume 60
    Issue 5 (Dec)

    2004

    Volume 91
    Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2003

    Volume 90
    Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2002

    Volume 89
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Dec)Issue 10 (Nov)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Nov)Issue 7 (Nov)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 88
    Issue 3 (Dec)

    2001

    Volume 88
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2000

    Volume 87
    Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1999

    Volume 86
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1998

    Volume 85
    Supplement 2 (Jul)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1997

    Volume 84
    Supplement 2 (Jun)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1996

    Volume 83
    Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1995

    Volume 82
    Supplement 1 (Nov)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1994

    Volume 81
    Supplement 1 (Oct)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1993

    Volume 80
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1992

    Volume 79
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1991

    Volume 78
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1990

    Volume 77
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1989

    Volume 76
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1988

    Volume 75
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1987

    Volume 74
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1986

    Volume 73
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1985

    Volume 72
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1984

    Volume 71
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1983

    Volume 70
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1982

    Volume 69
    Supplement 6 (Dec)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1981

    Volume 68
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1980

    Volume 67
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1979

    Volume 66
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1978

    Volume 65
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1977

    Volume 64
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1976

    Volume 63
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1975

    Volume 62
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1974

    Volume 61
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1973

    Volume 60
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1972

    Volume 59
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1971

    Volume 58
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1970

    Volume 57
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1969

    Volume 56
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1968

    Volume 55
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1967

    Volume 54
    Issue 13 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1966

    Volume 53
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1965

    Volume 52
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1964

    Volume 51
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1963

    Volume 50
    Issue 227 (Nov)Issue 226 (Sep)Issue 225 (Jul)Issue 224 (May)Issue 223 (Mar)Issue 222 (Jan)

    1962

    Volume 50
    Issue 221 (Nov)Issue 220 (Sep)Issue 219 (Jul)
    Volume 49
    Issue 218 (May)Issue 217 (Mar)

    1961

    Volume 49
    Issue 216 (Dec)Issue 215 (Nov)Issue 214 (Sep)Issue 213 (Jul)
    Volume 48
    Issue 212 (May)Issue 211 (Mar)Issue 210 (Jan)

    1960

    Volume 48
    Issue 209 (Nov)Issue 208 (Sep)Issue 207 (Jul)
    Volume 47
    Issue 206 (May)Issue 205 (Mar)Issue 204 (Jan)

    1959

    Volume 47
    Issue 203 (Nov)Issue 202 (Sep)Issue 201 (Jul)
    Volume 46
    Issue 200 (May)Issue 199 (Mar)Issue 198 (Jan)

    1958

    Volume 46
    Issue 197 (Nov)Issue 196 (Sep)Issue 195 (Jul)
    Volume 45
    Issue 194 (May)Issue 193 (Mar)Issue 192 (Jan)

    1957

    Volume 45
    Issue 191 (Nov)Issue 190 (Sep)Issue 189 (Jul)
    Volume 44
    Issue 188 (May)Issue 187 (Mar)Issue 186 (Jan)

    1956

    Volume 44
    Issue 185 (Nov)Issue 184 (Sep)Issue 183 (Jul)
    Volume 43
    Issue 182 (May)Issue 181 (Mar)Issue 180 (Jan)

    1955

    Volume 43
    Issue 179 (Nov)Issue 178 (Sep)Issue 177 (Jul)
    Volume 42
    Issue 176 (May)Issue 175 (Mar)Issue 174 (Jan)

    1954

    Volume 42
    Issue 173 (Nov)Issue 172 (Sep)Issue 171 (Jul)
    Volume 41
    Issue 170 (May)Issue 169 (Mar)Issue 168 (Jan)

    1953

    Volume 41
    Issue 167 (Nov)Issue 166 (Sep)Issue 165 (Jul)
    Volume 40
    Issue 164 (May)Issue 163 (Mar)Issue 162 (Jan)

    1952

    Volume 40
    Issue 161 (Nov)Issue 160 (Sep)Issue 159 (Jul)
    Volume 39
    Issue 158 (May)Issue 157 (Mar)Issue 156 (Jan)

    1951

    Volume 39
    Issue 155 (Nov)Issue 154 (Sep)Issue 153 (Jul)
    Volume 38
    Issue 152 (Apr)Issue 151 (Jan)

    1950

    Volume 38
    Issue 150 (Oct)Issue 149 (Jul)
    Volume 37
    Issue 148 (Apr)Issue 147 (Jan)

    1949

    Volume 37
    Issue 146 (Oct)Issue 145 (Jul)
    Volume 36
    Issue 144 (Apr)Issue 143 (Jan)

    1948

    Volume 36
    Issue 142 (Oct)Issue 141 (Jul)
    Volume 35
    Issue 140 (Apr)Issue 139 (Jan)

    1947

    Volume 35
    Issue 138 (Oct)Issue 137 (Jul)
    Volume 34
    Issue 136 (Apr)Issue 135 (Jan)

    1946

    Volume 34
    Issue 134 (Oct)Issue 133 (Jul)
    Volume 33
    Issue 132 (Apr)Issue 131 (Jan)

    1945

    Volume 33
    Issue 130 (Oct)Issue 129 (Jul)
    Volume 32
    Issue 128 (Apr)Issue 127 (Jan)

    1944

    Volume 32
    Issue 126 (Oct)Issue 125 (Jul)
    Volume 31
    Issue 124 (Apr)Issue 123 (Jan)

    1943

    Volume 31
    Issue 122 (Oct)Issue 121 (Jul)
    Volume 30
    Issue 120 (Apr)Issue 119 (Jan)

    1942

    Volume 30
    Issue 118 (Oct)Issue 117 (Jul)
    Volume 29
    Issue 116 (Apr)Issue 115 (Jan)

    1941

    Volume 29
    Issue 114 (Oct)Issue 113 (Jul)
    Volume 28
    Issue 112 (Apr)Issue 111 (Jan)

    1940

    Volume 28
    Issue 110 (Oct)Issue 109 (Jul)
    Volume 27
    Issue 108 (Apr)Issue 107 (Jan)

    1939

    Volume 27
    Issue 106 (Oct)Issue 105 (Jul)
    Volume 26
    Issue 104 (Apr)Issue 103 (Jan)

    1938

    Volume 26
    Issue 102 (Oct)Issue 101 (Jul)
    Volume 25
    Issue 100 (Apr)Issue 99 (Jan)

    1937

    Volume 25
    Issue 98 (Oct)Issue 97 (Jul)
    Volume 24
    Issue 96 (Apr)Issue 95 (Jan)

    1936

    Volume 24
    Issue 94 (Oct)Issue 93 (Jul)
    Volume 23
    Issue 92 (Apr)Issue 91 (Jan)

    1935

    Volume 23
    Issue 90 (Oct)Issue 89 (Jul)
    Volume 22
    Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 88 (Apr)Issue 87 (Jan)

    1934

    Volume 22
    Issue 86 (Oct)Issue 85 (Jul)
    Volume 21
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 84 (Apr)Issue 83 (Jan)

    1933

    Volume 21
    Issue 82 (Oct)Issue 81 (Jul)
    Volume 20
    Supplement 32 (Apr)Supplement 31 (Apr)Supplement 30 (Apr)Supplement 29 (Apr)Issue 80 (Apr)Issue 79 (Jan)

    1932

    Volume 20
    Issue 78 (Oct)Issue 77 (Jul)
    Volume 19
    Issue 76 (Apr)Issue 75 (Jan)

    1931

    Volume 19
    Supplement 28 (Jan)Supplement 27 (Jan)Supplement 26 (Jan)Supplement 25 (Jan)Issue 74 (Oct)Issue 73 (Jul)
    Volume 18
    Supplement 24 (Jan)Supplement 23 (Jan)Supplement 22 (Jan)Supplement 21 (Jan)Issue 72 (Apr)Issue 71 (Jan)

    1930

    Volume 18
    Issue 70 (Oct)Issue 69 (Jul)
    Volume 17
    Supplement 20 (Jan)Supplement 19 (Jan)Issue 68 (Apr)Issue 67 (Jan)

    1929

    Volume 17
    Supplement 18 (Oct)Supplement 17 (Jan)Issue 66 (Oct)Issue 65 (Jul)
    Volume 16
    Supplement 16 (Jan)Supplement 15 (Jan)Supplement 14 (Jan)Supplement 13 (Jul)Issue 64 (Apr)Issue 63 (Jan)

    1928

    Volume 16
    Issue 62 (Oct)Issue 61 (Jul)
    Volume 15
    Issue 60 (Apr)Issue 59 (Jan)

    1927

    Volume 15
    Issue 58 (Oct)Issue 57 (Jul)
    Volume 14
    Supplement 8 (Apr)Supplement 7 (Apr)Supplement 6 (Apr)Supplement 5 (Apr)Issue 56 (Apr)Issue 55 (Jan)

    1926

    Volume 14
    Issue 54 (Oct)Issue 53 (Jul)
    Volume 13
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 52 (Apr)Issue 51 (Jan)

    1925

    Volume 13
    Issue 50 (Oct)Issue 49 (Jul)
    Volume 12
    Issue 48 (Apr)Issue 47 (Jan)

    1924

    Volume 12
    Issue 46 (Oct)Issue 45 (Jul)
    Volume 11
    Issue 44 (Apr)Issue 43 (Jan)

    1923

    Volume 11
    Issue 42 (Oct)Issue 41 (Jul)
    Volume 10
    Issue 40 (Apr)Issue 39 (Jan)

    1922

    Volume 10
    Issue 38 (Oct)Issue 37 (Jul)
    Volume 9
    Issue 36 (Jan)Issue 35 (Jul)

    1921

    Volume 9
    Issue 34 (Jan)Issue 33 (Jul)

    1920

    Volume 8
    Issue 32 (Jan)Issue 31 (Jan)Issue 30 (Jan)Issue 29 (Jul)

    1919

    Volume 7
    Issue 28 (Jan)Issue 27 (Jan)Issue 26 (Jan)Issue 25 (Jul)

    1918

    Volume 6
    Issue 24 (Jan)Issue 23 (Jan)Issue 22 (Jan)Issue 21 (Jul)

    1917

    Volume 5
    Issue 20 (Jan)Issue 19 (Jan)Issue 18 (Jan)Issue 17 (Jul)

    1916

    Volume 4
    Issue 16 (Jan)Issue 15 (Jan)Issue 14 (Jan)Issue 13 (Jan)

    1915

    Volume 3
    Issue 12 (Jan)Issue 11 (Jan)Issue 10 (Jan)Issue 9 (Jan)

    1914

    Volume 2
    Issue 8 (Jan)Issue 7 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jan)Issue 5 (Jul)

    1913

    Volume 1
    Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jul)

    0020

    Volume 106
    January
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Added value of preoperative MRI in primary surgery for breast cancer

    Breitholtz, Björn Brännström; Gardfjell, Anna; Åhsberg, Kristina

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.030pmid: N/A

    IntroductionThe use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in preoperative staging of breast cancer remains arbitrary. The high sensitivity together with the somewhat lower specificity of MRI provides a unique balance between finding true extent/new lesions and overdiagnostics/overtreatment. This study aims to assess a cohort of breast cancer patients examined with preoperative MRI and estimate the potential benefits and negative effects.MethodThis retrospective, single center cohort study included patients examined with preoperative MRI before primary surgery for breast cancer between 2019 and 2022.ResultIn total, 94 patients were included. Median age was 54 years, 37.2% were premenopausal and 35.1% had invasive lobular carcinoma. The detection rate of occult contralateral breast cancer was 9.6%. Reoperation rate due to positive margins was 6.4%. Bland-Altman statistics showed higher agreement between estimated extent by MRI and postoperative histopathological extent, compared to estimation by ultrasound or mammography. MRI contributed to correct change of operation method in 18.1%, but also less favorable choice of surgery in 5.3% of patients (such as unnecessary mastectomy). The total mastectomy rate was 54.3%. Unnecessary biopsies of benign lesions after MRI were performed in 11.7% of patients.DiscussionIn this cohort, breast MRI had a clear impact on the surgical treatment of breast cancer, affecting choice of operation method. About a fifth of patients examined with MRI received a benefit with a better management of their breast cancer, however an equally large part received less optimal diagnostics and treatment.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Predictability of symptom changes following hemithyroidectomy due to thyroid nodules/goitre causing local symptoms - a prospective multicentre study

    Beka, Ervin; Shabo, Ivan; Fornander, David; Johansson, Kenth; Gimm, Oliver

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.046pmid: N/A

    IntroductionBenign thyroid nodules/goitre are very common. When associated with local symptoms including dysphagia, dyspnoea, dysphonia and pharyngeal discomfort, patients often undergo hemithyroidectomy to improve their symptoms. Whether the improvement of the local symptoms can be predicted is poorly investigated.MethodIn this prospective multicentre study, patients filled in four validated questionnaires before, six weeks and one year after hemithyroidectomy. Furthermore, the size of the thyroid nodule/goitre, the size of the isthmus and its distance to the jugulum were registered.ResultA total of 119 consecutive patients were offered to participate in the study. Of these, 72 patients completed the preoperative and postoperative questionnaires after six weeks and 70 patients completed the 1-year follow-up. Of interest, the reported preoperative symptoms did not correlate at all with the objective measurements. Six weeks after surgery, the majority (95%) of patients reported some sort of dysphonia despite the absence of objective findings like laryngeal nerve palsy. In contrast, a significant proportion (73%) of patients noted symptomatic improvements regarding all other symptoms already six weeks postoperatively. Of note, symptom improvements were even reported of patients with thyroid nodules as small as 1 cm in size. After 1 year, 13% of the patients still experienced some sort of dysphonia. Nevertheless, 89% of the patients would recommend the procedure to other patients with similar symptoms.DiscussionThe vast majority of patients with local symptoms due to benign thyroid nodules/goitre noticed an improvement of their symptoms after hemithyroidectomy. The symptomatic improvements were not predictable based on objective preoperative measurements.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Morbidity following surgical resection of early rectal cancer

    Wetterholm, Erik; Arthursson, Victoria; Thorlacius, Henrik; Rönnow, Carl-Fredrik

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.077pmid: N/A

    IntroductionWhen deciding on treatment for early rectal cancer, available options must be considered based on both the risk for recurrence and the risk of postoperative morbidity. This retrospective registry study aimed to investigate morbidity and mortality following surgical resection of T1 and T2 rectal cancer.MethodPopulation-based registry study using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry, including all pathologically staged T1 and T2 rectal cancer cases between 2011 and 2022 treated with anterior resection with or without diverging ileostomy, abdominoperineal resection or Hartmann’s procedure. Complications were registered according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification and considered severe if CD³III. Patient characteristics were analysed using uni- and multivariate logistic regression to determine risk factors for complications.Result2548 rectal cancer patients, 761 with T1 and 1787 with T2, were included. A total of 922 complications were registered among 694 (27.2%) patients. 300 (11.8%) patients had one or more severe complications. 92 patients (3.6%) required intensive care, and 188 (7.4%) had a reoperation. 1063 (41.7%) patients received a temporary stoma (diverging ileostomy) and 1009 (39.6%) a permanent stoma. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 98 (6.4%) of 1539 patients undergoing anterior resection. 90-day mortality was 36 (1.4%). Male sex (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.34-2.23), ASA III-IV (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.18-1.99) and BMI>30 (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.86) were significant (p<0.05), independent risk factors for complications.DiscussionSurgical resection of early rectal cancer has a high rate of complications and stomas, which should be considered when deciding between treatment options.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Thrombolysis and infraclavicular first rib resection for primary subclavian venous thrombosis – results from a population-based strategy

    Schalling, Klara; Sartipy, Fredrik; Gillgren, Peter; Lindström, David; Mill, Victor; Smedberg, Christian; Westerlund, Eli; Malmstedt, Jonas

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.091pmid: N/A

    IntroductionPrimary subclavian venous thrombosis (PSVT), affects young patients with an active lifestyle or strenuous occupations. Treated with anticoagulation alone, up to 45% develop post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Early treatment with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) followed by first rib resection (FRR) has been shown to reduce PTS in selected cases. We report outcomes when this treatment is implemented in a regional population.MethodPatients with PSVT presenting within 14 days from symptom onset were treated between 2013 and 2024, and followed by clinical visits and duplex ultrasound 1 and 12 months after surgery. Primary outcome was Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and secondary outcome was clinical result according to the Derkash classification. Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Board.Result227 patients underwent CDT and FRR, with a median age of 30, (IQR 25-40 years) and 51% were women (n=116). Regular sport activity was performed by 70% (156/227). The median time from symptom onset to start of CDT was six (IQR 4-8) days. 197 patients completed 12 months follow-up. Median DASH-score at baseline was 30 (IQR 13-45) and decreased to 1 (IQR 0-6) at 12 months follow-up. Outcome at 12 months according to the Derkash classification was excellent or good in 98% (n=194/197).DiscussionEarly CDT and FFR in acute PSVT yields good results when implemented at a population level. This study supports that most patients with PSVT in a population can be identified early and offered treatment with early CDT and FFR to avoid PTS.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    The impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative infections in breast cancer surgery – a retrospective quality assessment

    Ekros, Alice

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.020pmid: N/A

    IntroductionBreast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women, with surgery playing a central role in the treatment. Various surgical approaches exist, including a growing field of oncoplastic techniques. Despite classified as a clean surgery, breast surgery has higher rates of postoperative infections compared to other clean surgeries. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in preventing infections remains indecisive.MethodThis study aimed to investigate the correlation between prophylactic antibiotics and postoperative infections in breast cancer surgery. Secondary objectives included assessing the impact of surgical complexity and demographic factors on infection risk.This study included 578 patients with an invasive breast cancer diagnosis undergoing surgery at Skåne University Hospital during year 2022. Patient records were reviewed in Melior to gather information on demographics, surgical type, prophylactic antibiotic administration and postoperative infections.ResultThe overall postoperative infection rate after breast cancer surgery was 14% and 72% received prophylactic antibiotics. Mastectomy had the highest postoperative infection rate. No significant difference regarding postoperative infection could be observed between the patients who received prophylactic antibiotic treatment and those who did not (p = 0.88). An increased body mass index was significantly correlated with an increased risk of postoperative infection (p = 0.01).DiscussionProphylactic antibiotics were not associated with a decreased risk of developing postoperative infection. The complexity of the procedure may correlate to the risk of developing a postoperative infection but overall no significance was shown in this study. However, demographic factors as higher body mass index was significantly correlated with an increased risk for postoperative infection.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Ultraviolet light disinfection of flexible endoscopes without working channels – a systematic review and assessment of medical and economical aspects

    Holmberg, Anna; Lunde, Anna; Lundahl, Helene Nilsson; Johnsson, Folke; Löfvendahl, Sofia; Ahl, Eric; Sundin, Ylva; Huss, Linnea

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.132pmid: N/A

    IntroductionThe objective of this report was to evaluate the disinfection process of flexible endoscopes without working channels using ultraviolet (UV) light, in comparison to the currently recommended reprocessing method, in a clinical setting.MethodA comprehensive search of articles was conducted in November 2024 across Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. Ongoing studies and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) reports were also searched. The selected studies were assessed by at least two independent authors, and inclusion decisions made by consensus. The studies underwent critical appraisal, and relevant data were extracted. Data on the level of disinfection were pooled in a meta-analysis using R software. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.In collaboration with experienced hygiene nurses and a physician involved in the project, organizational issues related to implementation were addressed, and a health economic analysis was conducted.ResultManual pre-cleaning followed by ultraviolet (UV) light disinfection of flexible endoscopes without working channels may offer a slightly higher level of effectiveness compared to the currently employed reprocessing method using an endoscope washer-disinfector.An organizational review indicates that there are benefits to using UVC light, as the disinfection process is faster and requires fewer installations.The health economic analysis supports the use of UV-light disinfection due to lower investment and running costs.DiscussionThis health technology assessment can be used as a decision basis for a preferred desinfection process at units using flexible endoscopes without working channels.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Incidence of early portal venous thrombosis following pancreatic surgery with venous resection: a single-center experience POD1 ultrasound evaluation

    Ibrahim, Ibrahim; Amanoil, Rosette; Sotirova, Ira; Scandavini, Chiara; Yoshino, Jun; Valente, Roberto; Gkekas, Ioannis; Franklin, Oskar; Halimi, Asif

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.105pmid: N/A

    IntroductionPortal venous thrombosis (PVT) is a feared complication following pancreatectomy with venous resection, with reported rates ranging between 5% and 31%. Strategies to reduce PVT risk vary. This study evaluates early PVT incidence in patients undergoing venous resection using a standardized approach involving liberal Cattell Braasch maneuver, preference for end-to-end anastomosis, and intensified anticoagulation, combined with routine ultrasound assessment on postoperative day 1 (POD1).MethodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pancreatectomy with SMV and/or portal vein resection between 2020–2023 at Umeå University Hospital. The primary outcome was symptomatic PVT within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included detection of PVT or flow irregularity on POD1 ultrasound, and postoperative morbidity/mortality.ResultA total of 60 patients were included (median age 69.4 years). Most underwent segmental venous resection (85%) and Whipple (48.3%) or total pancreatectomy (45%). The Cattell- Braasch maneuver was used in 88.3% of cases. POD1 ultrasound was performed in 95% (57/60) of patients. Only one patient (1.6%) developed symptomatic PVT—this patient did not undergo POD1 ultrasound. No PVT or flow irregularity was detected on any POD1 ultrasound. Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a) occurred in 15%, while 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 5% and 6.6%, respectively.DiscussionA standardized surgical and postoperative protocol involving liberal use of the Cattell- Braasch maneuver, end-to-end anastomosis, and intensified anticoagulation appears to be associated with a low incidence of early PVT after venous resection in pancreatic surgery. POD1 ultrasound may be a valuable tool in early detection, potentially supporting risk stratification and timely intervention.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Effects on delayed surgery in inflammatory bowel disease – a health economic analysis

    de la Croix, Hanna; Bengtsson, Jonas; Fledsberg, Stephanie; Park, Jennifer; Åberg, Helena; Hermanson, Maria

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.065pmid: N/A

    IntroductionTiming in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is important, considering risk of complications. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization and costs of delayed elective surgery in patients with IBD.MethodThis is a descriptive and observational study based on retrospectively collected data from Swedish national and regional registries. Patients either waiting for, or who had undergone, elective surgery at Sahlgrenska University Hospital during 2017-2023 with an IBD-diagnosis were identified.ResultIn total, 189 individuals were included, 40 controls (mean age 43.6 years, 18 women) who had surgery within 3 months, and 149 cases (mean age 41.6 years, 46 women), who had been waiting for surgery for at least 6 months. After 24-36 months the cost for the controls was 5470 EUR and for the cases 8510 EUR. Mean household yearly income was 36 027 EUR (CI 27 310–44 743) for the controls and 28 688 EUR (CI 25 844–31 532) for the cases. In total, 90% (n=36) were born in Sweden in the control group vs. 75.2% (n=112) in the case group. There was no difference in terms of sick leaves between the groups.DiscussionHealth care costs for patients with IBD waiting for surgery are similar to those of patients who have had elective surgery within 3 months. Given the additional postoperative costs for patients waiting for surgery, the overall costs are higher for this group. A short period of time between surgical decision and surgical date is therefore advisable.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Effects on delayed surgery in inflammatory bowel disease – health related quality of life

    de la Croix, Hanna; Bengtsson, Jonas; Fledsberg, Stephanie; Åberg, Helena; Hermanson, Maria

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.072pmid: N/A

    IntroductionTiming in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is important considering risk of complications, such as fistulizing disease, severe proctitis and high stoma output. This study aimed to address Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) when waiting for surgery.MethodThis study was a cross-sectional register-based study combined with individual-level collected data on the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire assessing the effects of delayed elective surgery on HRQoL amongst patients with IBD. Patients either waiting for, or who had undergone surgery at Sahlgrenska University Hospital during 2017-2023 with an IBD-diagnosis were identified.ResultOf the 214 patients included in the study (33.64% women, mean age 44.3+16.9 years), 60% of the patients had undergone surgery, while the remainder were still awaiting surgery. The mean EQ VAS for the entire sample was 64.9, with the lowest scores observed when waiting for surgery for more than one year, compared to previous age matched population norms in Sweden, with a mean score of 87.0. The mean EQ-5D-5L index for patients waiting less than 3 months differed from those who waited 12-24 months (p=0.017) and >24months (p=0.012) respectively. Likewise, the mean EQ-5D index for those who waited 3-6 months differed from those waiting >12-24 months (p=0.036) and >24 months (p=0.032), using the Swedish value set.DiscussionThere were significant differences in HRQoL between patients who had undergone surgery within the Swedish health care guarantee (<3 months) and those who had been waiting for at least one year. This indicates that waiting time for surgery may impact HRQoL among patients with IBD.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Urinary and sexual dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer following a watch and wait protocol – results from the Swedish national WoW study

    Mijaljevic, Lidija; Azhar, Najia; Chabok, Abbas; Folkesson, Joakim; Gerdin, Anders; Grönkvist, Rode; Hermus, Linda; Larsson, Charlotta; Martling, Anna; Matthiessen, Peter; Nilsson, Per; Rydbeck, Daniel; Angenete, Eva

    2025 British Journal of Surgery

    Showing 1 to 10 of 132 Articles

    Previous12345…14Next
    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals:

    Annals of SurgeryPlastic and Reconstructive SurgeryJAMA SurgerySurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional TechniquesWorld Journal of SurgeryAnnals of Plastic SurgeryLangenbeck's Archives of SurgeryAesthetic Plastic SurgeryFacial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic MedicineMicrosurgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf149.085pmid: N/A

    IntroductionTreatment for rectal cancer is associated with urinary and sexual dysfunction. Few studies describe urinary and sexual function after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy and a watch and wait (WoW) approach. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and change over time in patient-reported urinary and sexual dysfunction in patients within the Swedish watch and wait study.MethodThe Swedish Watch and Wait (WoW) study is a multicenter prospective cohort study including patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer. A total of 211 patients with cCR (stage I-III rectal cancer) were included between January 2017 and February 2023. Questionnaires were collected at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-treatment.ResultQuestionnaire data were available for 173 patients at baseline and 136 at two years. The median age was 66 years (60% male). Neoadjuvant treatment was given as short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) (27.5%), SCRT combined with chemotherapy (66.5%), long-course chemoradiotherapy (4.9%) and other treatments (1.1%).Urinary incontinence during daytime increased from 9,2 % at baseline to 14,7% two years after treatment. Erectile dysfunction was stable: 24,0 % at baseline and 23,5 % at two years follow-up. In women, sexual function including arousal, lubrication and orgasm decreased during follow-up.DiscussionUrinary and sexual dysfunction is seen in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy without subsequent surgery. Urinary incontinence slightly increased during follow-up. Female sexual function decreased, whereas erectile dysfunction remained stable during follow-up. The results are encouraging but also indicate that dysfunction is present, albeit to a lesser extent than if surgery is part of the treatment.