British Journal of Cancer

doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02331-wpmid: 37443346

BackgroundThe immune landscape of uveal melanoma liver metastases (UMLM) has not been sufficiently studied.MethodsImmune cell infiltrates (ICIs), PD-1 and PD-L1 were characterised in 62 UMLM and 28 primary uveal melanomas (PUM). ICI, PD-1 and PD-L1 were scored as: (1) % tumoral area occupied by tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes or macrophages (TILs, TIMs) and (2) % perTumoral (perT) area. ICIs and other variables including histopathologic growth patterns (HGPs), replacement and desmoplastic, of UMLM were analysed for their prognostic value.ResultsICIs recognised by haematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES) and IHC (e.g., T cells (CD3), B cells (CD20). Macrophages (CD68), (CD163), were primarily localised to the perT region in PUM and UMLM and were more conspicuous in UMLM. HES, CD3, CD4, FoxP3, CD8, CD20, PD-1 TILs were scant (<5%). TIMs were more frequent, particularly in UMLM than in PUM. Both CD68+ TIMs and HGPs remained significant on multivariate analysis, influencing overall (OS) and metastasis-specific overall survival (MSOS). CD68 + , CD163+ and CD20+ perT infiltrates in UMLM predicted increased OS and MSOS on univariate analysis.ConclusionsTILs and PD-L1 have no predictive value in PUM or UMLM. CD68+ and CD163+TIMs, CD20+ perT lymphocytes, and HGPs are important prognostic factors in UMLMs.

doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02344-5pmid: 37443348

BackgroundWe previously reported activity of pelareorep, pembrolizumab and chemotherapy. Patients developed new T-cell clones and increased peripheral T-cell clonality, leading to an inflamed tumour. To evaluate a chemotherapy-free regimen, this study assesses if pelareorep and pembrolizumab has efficacy by inducing anti-tumour immunological changes (NCT03723915).MethodsPDAC patients who progressed after first-line therapy, received iv pelareorep induction with pembrolizumab every 21-days. Primary objective is overall response rate. Secondary objectives included evaluation of immunological changes within tumour and blood.ResultsClinical benefit rate (CBR) was 42% amongst 12 patients. One patient achieved partial response (PR) and four stable disease (SD). Seven progressed, deemed non-responders (NR). VDAC1 expression in peripheral CD8+ T cells was higher at baseline in CBR than NR but decreased in CBR upon treatment. On-treatment peripheral CD4+ Treg levels decreased in CBR but not in NR. Analysis of tumour demonstrated PD-L1+ cells touching CD8+ T cells, and NK cells were more abundant post-treatment vs. baseline. A higher intensity of PD-L1 in tumour infiltrates at baseline, particularly in CBR vs. NR. Finally, higher levels of soluble (s)IDO, sLag3, sPD-1 observed at baseline among NR vs. CBR.ConclusionPelareorep and pembrolizumab showed modest efficacy in unselected patients, although potential immune and metabolic biomarkers were identified to warrant further evaluation.

BackgroundCombining the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) result with risk factors for advanced neoplasia (AN) may increase the yield of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening without increasing the number of colonoscopies. We conducted a randomised controlled trial in the Dutch CRC screening programme to evaluate a previously developed risk model including FIT, age, sex, smoking status, and CRC family history.MethodsA total of 22,748 individuals aged 56–75 years were pre-randomised to the risk-model group or the FIT-only group. Both groups received the FIT; those allocated to the risk-model group also received a single-page questionnaire. Study participants with a positive result (FIT ≥ 15 µg Hb/g faeces and/or risk ≥0.10) were referred for colonoscopy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of invitees in whom AN was detected.ResultsIn the risk-model group, 3113/11,364 invitees (27%) returned the FIT and questionnaire versus 3061/11,384 invitees (27%) in the FIT-only group (p = 0.40). The yield of AN was 3.70/1000 invitees in the risk-model group versus 3.43/1000 in the FIT-only group (absolute difference: 0.27/1000, 95%CI: −1.30 to 1.82, p = 0.82).ConclusionsCombining FIT with risk factors for CRC did not increase the yield of AN compared to FIT-only in an existing CRC screening programme. There was no difference in participation between groups.Clinical trial registrationNCT04490551 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the antitumour activity, safety, and tolerability of pamiparib plus tislelizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumours.MethodsIn this study, patients were enrolled into eight arms by tumour type. All received pamiparib 40 mg orally twice daily plus tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), safety, and tolerability.ResultsOverall, 180 patients were enrolled. In the overall population, the ORR was 20.0% (range: 0–47.4 across study arms), with median DoR of 17.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2, not estimable [NE]). The highest ORR was observed in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) arm (patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and/or homologous recombination deficiency) (ORR: 47.4%; median DoR: 17.1 months [95% CI: 3.0, NE]). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of ≥Grade 3 occurred in 61.7% of patients. Serious TEAEs occurred in 50.0% of patients.ConclusionsPamiparib plus tislelizumab showed a variable level of antitumour activity in patients with advanced solid tumours, with the highest ORR in TNBC and was associated with a manageable safety profile.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov: NCT02660034.

doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02356-1pmid: 37488446

BackgroundThe first-in-class brain-penetrating synthetic hydroxylated lipid idroxioleic acid (2-OHOA; sodium 2-hydroxyoleate), activates sphingomyelin synthase expression and regulates membrane-lipid composition and mitochondrial energy production, inducing cancer cell autophagy. We report the findings of a multicentric first-in-human Phase 1/2A trial (NCT01792310) of 2-OHOA, identifying the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assessing safety and preliminary efficacy.MethodsWe performed an open-label, non-randomised trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and anti-tumour activity of daily oral treatment with 2-OHOA monotherapy (BID/TID) in 54 patients with glioma and other advanced solid tumours. A dose-escalation phase using a standard 3 + 3 design was performed to determine safety and tolerability. This was followed by two expansion cohorts at the MTD to determine the recommended Phase-2 dose (RP2D).ResultsIn total, 32 recurrent patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation phase (500–16,000 mg/daily). 2-OHOA was rapidly absorbed with dose-proportional exposure. Treatment was well-tolerated overall, with reversible grade 1–2 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea as the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Four patients had gastrointestinal dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea (three patients at 16,000 mg and one patient at 12,000 mg), establishing an RP2D at 12,000 mg/daily. Potential activity was seen in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG). Of the 21 patients with HGG treated across the dose escalation and expansion, 5 (24%) had the clinical benefit (RANO CR, PR and SD >6 cycles) with one exceptional response lasting >2.5 years.Conclusions2-OHOA demonstrated a good safety profile and encouraging activity in this difficult-to-treat malignant brain-tumour patient population, placing it as an ideal potential candidate for the treatment of glioma and other solid tumour malignancies.Clinical trial registrationEudraCT registration number: 2012-001527-13; Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01792310.

BackgroundRoutine reporting of cancer patient survival is important, both to monitor the effectiveness of health care and to inform about prognosis following a cancer diagnosis. A range of different survival measures exist, each serving different purposes and targeting different audiences. It is important that routine publications expand on current practice and provide estimates on a wider range of survival measures. We examine the feasibility of automated production of such statistics.MethodsWe used data on 23 cancer sites obtained from the Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN). We propose an automated way of estimating flexible parametric relative survival models and calculating estimates of net survival, crude probabilities, and loss in life expectancy across many cancer sites and subgroups of patients.ResultsFor 21 of 23 cancer sites, we were able to estimate survival models without assuming proportional hazards. Reliable estimates of all desired measures were obtained for all cancer sites.DiscussionIt may be challenging to implement new survival measures in routine publications as it can require the application of modeling techniques. We propose a way of automating the production of such statistics and show that we can obtain reliable estimates across a range of measures and subgroups of patients.