Astrophysics in 2001Trimble, Virginia; Aschwanden, Markus J.
doi: 10.1086/341673pmid: N/A
During the year, astronomers provided explanations for solar topics ranging from the multiple personality disorder of neutrinos to cannibalism of CMEs (coronal mass ejections) and extra‐solar topics including quivering stars, out‐of‐phase gaseous media, black holes of all sizes (too large, too small, and too medium), and the existence of the universe. Some of these explanations are probably possibly true, though the authors are not betting large sums on any one. The data ought to remain true forever, though this requires a careful definition of “data” (think of the Martian canals).
Planetary Companions to HD 136118, HD 50554, and HD 106252Based on observations obtained at Lick and Keck Observatories, which are operated by the Uni ...Fischer, Debra A.; Marcy, Geoffrey W.; Butler, R. Paul; Vogt, Steven S.; Walp, Bernie; Apps, Kevin
doi: 10.1086/341677pmid: N/A
Precise Doppler observations at Lick Observatory have revealed a substellar companion orbiting the F9 V star HD 136118 with an orbital period P = 1209 ± 24 days, velocity semiamplitude K = 212 ± 6 m s−1, and eccentricity of 0.37 ± 0.025. The assumed stellar mass of 1.24 M⊙ yields a Keplerian companion with Msin i = 11.9 MJ and semimajor axis of 2.3 AU. We also confirm the orbital solutions for two previously announced planets, one orbiting the F8 V star HD 50554 and one orbiting the G0 V star HD 106252. Our orbital solution for HD 50554 yields P = 1254 ± 34 days, K = 78.5 ± 6.7 m s−1, and e = 0.51 ± 0.06. The assumed stellar mass of 1.065 M⊙ implies a companion mass Msin i = 3.7 MJ and semimajor axis of 2.2 AU. For HD 106252, we find P = 1503.3 ± 62 days, K = 150.9 ± 25 m s−1, and eccentricity e = 0.57 ± 0.11. The assumed stellar mass of 0.96 M⊙ implies Msin i = 6.96 MJ and semimajor axis of 2.42 AU.
Line Absorption as a Metallicity Index for Giant StarsGray, David F.; Scott, Heather R.; Postma, Joseph E.
doi: 10.1086/341675pmid: N/A
The fraction of light removed from a star’s spectrum by the spectral lines, the line absorption, is shown to be a precise empirical indicator of metallicity. We measured the line absorption in 89 class III giant stars in a 42.5 Å window between 6219.0 and 6261.5 Å and then calibrated these values against published metallicities. We show that the line absorption can be measured precisely enough to improve the metallicity precision about fivefold over the original calibration metallicities, reaching a precision of 0.01 dex in favorable cases.
Solving Olin Wilson’s MysteryAbt, Helmut A.
doi: 10.1086/341676pmid: N/A
Wilson showed that G8–M1 dwarfs have a range of 0.30 mag in P−V color whereas the color range for earlier stars is 0.12 mag. He attributed the increased range for the later stars to differing hydrogen‐to‐metal ratios in the temperature region where most of the electrons come from the metals. I explored those stars using Hipparcos parallaxes and photometry and with MK types. His effect can be explained without resorting to abundance differences, which are not confirmed elsewhere, by poorer spectral classification from unwidened spectra for the fainter stars and the use of maximum color ranges, rather than dispersions. I also considered, with negative results, the possibility that the Ca ii H and K emission lines or chromospheric activity could cause the large ranges in colors. Different amounts of chromospheric activity do not affect the colors significantly.