Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Ali-Khan, A. Daar, C. Shuman, P. Ray, S. Scherer (2009)
Whole Genome Scanning: Resolving Clinical Diagnosis and Management Amidst Complex DataPediatric Research, 66
K. Hens, H. Nys, J. Cassiman, K. Dierickx (2010)
The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic researchJournal of Medical Ethics, 37
Charles Smith (2000)
Content analysis and narrative analysis.
B. Wilfond, K. Carpenter (2008)
Incidental Findings in Pediatric ResearchThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36
K. Kaut (2006)
Counseling Psychology in the Era of Genetic TestingThe Counseling Psychologist, 34
J. Berg, M. Khoury, J. Evans (2011)
Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a timeGenetics in Medicine, 13
Julie Sapp, Danielle Dong, Caryn Stark, Lauren Ivey, Gillian Hooker, L. Biesecker, B. Biesecker (2014)
Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in childrenClinical Genetics, 85
M. Driessnack, S. Daack-Hirsch, Nancy Downing, A. Hanish, Lisa Shah, Mohammed Alasagheirin, C. Simon, Janet Williams (2013)
The disclosure of incidental genomic findings: an “ethically important moment” in pediatric research and practiceJournal of Community Genetics, 4
T. Marteau, D. French, S. Griffin, A. Prevost, Stephen Sutton, C. Watkinson, S. Attwood, G. Hollands (2010)
Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 10
M. Cortazzi (1994)
Narrative analysisLanguage Teaching, 27
C. Fernandez (2008)
Public Expectations for Return of Results—Time to Stop Being Paternalistic?The American Journal of Bioethics, 8
Ian Balfour-Lynn, Su Madge, Robert Dinwiddie (1995)
Testing carrier status in siblings of patients with cystic fibrosis.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 72
I. Kohane, D. Masys, R. Altman (2006)
The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.JAMA, 296 2
J. Evans (2013)
Return of results to the families of children in genomic sequencing: tallying risks and benefitsGenetics in Medicine, 15
T. Sadler, D. Zeidler (2005)
Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42
H. Hsieh, S. Shannon (2005)
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 15
C. Bennette, S. Trinidad, S. Fullerton, D. Patrick, L. Amendola, W. Burke, F. Hisama, G. Jarvik, D. Regier, D. Veenstra (2013)
Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value—development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT)Genetics in Medicine, 15
Gabrielle Christenhusz, K. Devriendt, K. Dierickx (2012)
To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetics contextsEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 21
P. Stankiewicz, A. Beaudet (2007)
Use of array CGH in the evaluation of dysmorphology, malformations, developmental delay, and idiopathic mental retardation.Current opinion in genetics & development, 17 3
S. Petersa, S. Lahamb, I. Winshipa (2014)
The future in clinical genetics : affective forecasting biases in patient and clinician decision making
David Miller, M. Adam, M. Adam, S. Aradhya, L. Biesecker, A. Brothman, N. Carter, D. Church, J. Crolla, E. Eichler, C. Epstein, W. Faucett, L. Feuk, J. Friedman, A. Hamosh, L. Jackson, E. Kaminsky, K. Kok, I. Krantz, R. Kuhn, Charles Lee, J. Ostell, C. Rosenberg, S. Scherer, N. Spinner, D. Stavropoulos, J. Tepperberg, E. Thorland, J. Vermeesch, D. Waggoner, M. Watson, C. Martin, D. Ledbetter (2010)
Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.American journal of human genetics, 86 5
Gabrielle Christenhusz, K. Devriendt, K. Dierickx (2013)
Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research.European journal of medical genetics, 56 10
Gabrielle Christenhusz, K. Devriendt, K. Dierickx (2013)
Secondary variants – in defense of a more fitting term in the incidental findings debateEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 21
S. Wolf, F. Lawrenz, Charles Nelson, J. Kahn, M. Cho, E. Clayton, J. Fletcher, M. Georgieff, D. Hammerschmidt, K. Hudson, J. Illes, V. Kapur, Moira Keane, B. Koenig, B. LeRoy, E. McFarland, J. Paradise, L. Parker, S. Terry, B. Ness, B. Wilfond (2008)
Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and RecommendationsThe Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36
S. Creighton, E. Almqvist, D. Macgregor, Bridget Fernandez, H. Hogg, J. Beis, J. Welch, C. Riddell, R. Lokkesmoe, M. Khalifa, J. MacKenzie, A. Sajoo, S. Farrell, F. Robert, A. Shugar, A. Summers, W. Meschino, D. Allingham-Hawkins, T. Chiu, A. Hunter, J. Allanson, H. Hare, J. Schween, L. Collins, S. Sanders, C. Greenberg, S. Cardwell, E. Lemire, P. MacLeod, M. Hayden (2003)
Predictive, pre‐natal and diagnostic genetic testing for Huntington's disease: the experience in Canada from 1987 to 2000Clinical Genetics, 63
T. May, K. Zusevics, K. Strong (2013)
On the Ethics of Clinical Whole Genome Sequencing of ChildrenPediatrics, 132
A. Townsend, S. Adam, P. Birch, Zoe Lohn, F. Rousseau, J. Friedman (2012)
“I want to know what's in Pandora's box”: Comparing stakeholder perspectives on incidental findings in clinical whole genomic sequencingAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 158A
A. Bredenoord, H. Kroes, E. Cuppen, M. Parker, J. Delden (2011)
Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.Trends in genetics : TIG, 27 2
J. Kaye, P. Boddington, J. Vries, Naomi Hawkins, Karen Melham (2009)
Ethical implications of the use of whole genome methods in medical researchEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 18
M. Ropka, J. Wenzel, E. Phillips, M. Siadaty, J. Philbrick (2006)
Uptake Rates for Breast Cancer Genetic Testing: A Systematic ReviewCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 15
(1996)
Collecting data through joint interviews
J. Haidt (2001)
The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological review, 108 4
E. Mardis (2008)
Next-generation DNA sequencing methods.Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 9
Children with unexplained developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies are increasingly being referred for genetic diagnostic testing using array‐comparative genomic hybridisation (array‐CGH) and next‐generation sequencing (NGS) technologies. Their parents will have to deal with the secondary variants that will inevitably arise. We conducted 16 prospective semi‐structured interviews with native Dutch‐speaking parents whose children had undergone clinical array‐CGH testing. The interviews explored the parents' experiences, expectations and opinions, specifically regarding the communication of results. Concrete examples of ‘unexpected results’ were provided to help guide the discussion, differing in severity, treatability, time of onset, level of risk, and carrier status. Data was analysed using content and narrative analysis methodologies. Parental motivations for and against the disclosure of unexpected results cluster around four main themes: actionability; knowledge; context; and characteristics of the result. Most parents wished to know all types of results. Disclosure was framed within a holistic, contextual, family‐wide view. Genetic counselling should aim to integrate explorations of the motivations of parents surrounding the disclosure of results with good clinical care.
Clinical Genetics – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2014
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.