Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Studies in Witchcraft, Magic, War and Peace in Africa: Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (review)

Studies in Witchcraft, Magic, War and Peace in Africa: Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (review) Reviews least could not interact with and affect the physical world. Midelfort links this, however, not to agnostic or even Deist critiques of religion, but to a new and more scientific approach to biblical interpretation being developed by theologians, which maintained that the Bible, and crucially its overt references to demons and exorcism, should not be accepted literally, but rather needed to be understood historically. In his final chapter, Midelfort sets Gassner and the controversy he engendered even more broadly in the context of eighteenth-century modes of writing and polemic. Not so much Gassner himself but the debates of which he was the central focus can only be understood in light of the tremendous later-eighteenth-century increase in production of newspapers and journals in which not careful argument but rather sharp criticism and ridicule was the normal mode of expression. Again the point is that the Gassner affair was not atypical of its period, but instead illuminates, and is in turn illuminated by, essential aspects of Enlightenment society and culture. Gassner himself drops almost completely from sight in the final chapter, in fact, but it nevertheless serves as a valuable conclusion to the overall argument Midelfort has been building. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft University of Pennsylvania Press

Studies in Witchcraft, Magic, War and Peace in Africa: Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (review)

Magic, Ritual, and Witchcraft , Volume 3 (2) – Oct 25, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-pennsylvania-press/studies-in-witchcraft-magic-war-and-peace-in-africa-nineteenth-and-xnaVD82TtA

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 University of Pennsylvania Press
ISSN
1940-5111
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Reviews least could not interact with and affect the physical world. Midelfort links this, however, not to agnostic or even Deist critiques of religion, but to a new and more scientific approach to biblical interpretation being developed by theologians, which maintained that the Bible, and crucially its overt references to demons and exorcism, should not be accepted literally, but rather needed to be understood historically. In his final chapter, Midelfort sets Gassner and the controversy he engendered even more broadly in the context of eighteenth-century modes of writing and polemic. Not so much Gassner himself but the debates of which he was the central focus can only be understood in light of the tremendous later-eighteenth-century increase in production of newspapers and journals in which not careful argument but rather sharp criticism and ridicule was the normal mode of expression. Again the point is that the Gassner affair was not atypical of its period, but instead illuminates, and is in turn illuminated by, essential aspects of Enlightenment society and culture. Gassner himself drops almost completely from sight in the final chapter, in fact, but it nevertheless serves as a valuable conclusion to the overall argument Midelfort has been building.

Journal

Magic, Ritual, and WitchcraftUniversity of Pennsylvania Press

Published: Oct 25, 2008

There are no references for this article.