Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

"Into the House of an Entire Stranger": Why Sentimental Doesn't Equal Domestic in Early American Fiction

"Into the House of an Entire Stranger": Why Sentimental Doesn't Equal Domestic in Early American... MARION RUST University of Virginia ``Into the House of an Entire Stranger'' Why Sentimental Doesn't Equal Domestic in Early American Fiction Catharine Maria Sedgwick, in an 1812 letter to her father, Theodore Sedgwick, described the difference between their two realms of influence. The passage has become central to the analysis of early American gender ideology. She wrote: A life dignified by usefulness, of which it has been the object and the delight to do good, and the happiness to do it in an extended sphere, does furnish some points of imitation for the most limited routine of domestic life. Wisdom and virtue are never at a loss for occasions and times for their exercise; the same light that lightens the world is applied to individual use and gratification. You may benefit a Nation, my dear Papa, I may improve the condition of a fellow-being. (Dewey 91) Nancy Cott has cited this passage as evidence of ``a broader cultural body of meaning'' in which, ``denied the incentive and opportunity for economic (and, generally, public) ambition'' accorded to men, ``women had instead the opportunity to serve others directly, within family relationships for the most part'' (23). Nineteen years later, Philip http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Early American Literature University of North Carolina Press

"Into the House of an Entire Stranger": Why Sentimental Doesn't Equal Domestic in Early American Fiction

Early American Literature , Volume 37 (2) – Jul 1, 2002

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/into-the-house-of-an-entire-stranger-why-sentimental-doesn-t-equal-Grwww0geaO

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by The University of North Carolina Press.
ISSN
1534-147X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

MARION RUST University of Virginia ``Into the House of an Entire Stranger'' Why Sentimental Doesn't Equal Domestic in Early American Fiction Catharine Maria Sedgwick, in an 1812 letter to her father, Theodore Sedgwick, described the difference between their two realms of influence. The passage has become central to the analysis of early American gender ideology. She wrote: A life dignified by usefulness, of which it has been the object and the delight to do good, and the happiness to do it in an extended sphere, does furnish some points of imitation for the most limited routine of domestic life. Wisdom and virtue are never at a loss for occasions and times for their exercise; the same light that lightens the world is applied to individual use and gratification. You may benefit a Nation, my dear Papa, I may improve the condition of a fellow-being. (Dewey 91) Nancy Cott has cited this passage as evidence of ``a broader cultural body of meaning'' in which, ``denied the incentive and opportunity for economic (and, generally, public) ambition'' accorded to men, ``women had instead the opportunity to serve others directly, within family relationships for the most part'' (23). Nineteen years later, Philip

Journal

Early American LiteratureUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Jul 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.