Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Environmental Histories

Environmental Histories fo rum The Future of Civil War Era Studies Environmental Histories Lisa M. Brady, Boise State University http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-ofcivil-war-era-studies Consider the following statements: weather and geography critically influenced the planning and outcome of Civil War battles; disease killed more Civil War soldiers, sailors, and marines than combat; the South's reliance on cotton monoculture hampered the Confederacy's ability to feed and provision its forces and contributed to its military defeat. Each of these facts, separately and together, has been the subject of myriad studies aimed at elucidating the war's events and its greater meaning. Until recently, however, one fundamental lesson of these three points has gone unexplored by students of the Civil War: nature matters in history. Over the past decade or so, environmental historians have turned their attention to the connections between war and nature, with at least a dozen undertaking studies of the Civil War. Most of these scholars have examined the military conflict, though a handful have discussed the home front as well. Each has made compelling arguments about the fundamental role nature played in the war, encompassing both its material implications and its intellectual import. Two major areas have captured the interest of these scholars: soldier health and strategic decision-making. Through their work, we have gained important insight into nature's place in the war and into the ways Americans of all loyalties and backgrounds responded to the changes wrought by the conflict. Rich new ground invites future research: We still need an environmental analysis of mobilization, which affected ecosystems of all descriptions. We still need a comprehensive environmental history of the war, from its origins to its long-term impact on nature. As this subfield merges with the mainstream, and as this proliferation of environmental histories gets aggregated, how does it change our understandings of the Civil War era and American environmental history? http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of the Civil War Era University of North Carolina Press

Environmental Histories

Brady, Lisa M.
The Journal of the Civil War Era , Volume 2 (1) – Feb 23, 2012
Download PDF
1 page

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/environmental-histories-nn4pFjBcDj

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright @ The University of North Carolina Press
ISSN
2159-9807
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

fo rum The Future of Civil War Era Studies Environmental Histories Lisa M. Brady, Boise State University http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-ofcivil-war-era-studies Consider the following statements: weather and geography critically influenced the planning and outcome of Civil War battles; disease killed more Civil War soldiers, sailors, and marines than combat; the South's reliance on cotton monoculture hampered the Confederacy's ability to feed and provision its forces and contributed to its military defeat. Each of these facts, separately and together, has been the subject of myriad studies aimed at elucidating the war's events and its greater meaning. Until recently, however, one fundamental lesson of these three points has gone unexplored by students of the Civil War: nature matters in history. Over the past decade or so, environmental historians have turned their attention to the connections between war and nature, with at least a dozen undertaking studies of the Civil War. Most of these scholars have examined the military conflict, though a handful have discussed the home front as well. Each has made compelling arguments about the fundamental role nature played in the war, encompassing both its material implications and its intellectual import. Two major areas have captured the interest of these scholars: soldier health and strategic decision-making. Through their work, we have gained important insight into nature's place in the war and into the ways Americans of all loyalties and backgrounds responded to the changes wrought by the conflict. Rich new ground invites future research: We still need an environmental analysis of mobilization, which affected ecosystems of all descriptions. We still need a comprehensive environmental history of the war, from its origins to its long-term impact on nature. As this subfield merges with the mainstream, and as this proliferation of environmental histories gets aggregated, how does it change our understandings of the Civil War era and American environmental history?

Journal

The Journal of the Civil War Era – University of North Carolina Press

Published: Feb 23, 2012

There are no references for this article.