Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/university-of-hawai-i-press/xunzi-s-systematic-critique-of-mencius-emfEu9Q7cU
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- University of Hawai'I Press
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2003 University of Hawai'i Press.
- ISSN
- 1529-1898
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Some commentators hold that Xunzi's criticism of Mencius' thesis that human nature is good depends more on Xunzi's definition of xing or nature than on substantive argument. Some also claim that Xunzi is committed to accepting Mencius' thesis. A more precise account of Xunzi's critique is offered here, based on an elaboration of his distinction in the "Xing e pian" between ke yi (capacity) and neng (ability). Others have noted this distinction, but no one has sufficiently appreciated its role in making Xunzi's critique more systematic and substantive than it is usually thought to be.
Journal
Philosophy East and West – University of Hawai'I Press
Published: Apr 23, 2003