Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
t e r r i to r i a L i t Y a n d s Pac e P r o d u c t i o n i n c H i n a , guEst Editor University of California, Berkeley Analyses of the local state in China in the past three decades have made a major contribution to the theorization of the state. By observing the active role of the local state in the economic transformation in post-Mao China, we have learned that the local state can no longer be treated as a passive agent, subordinate to the principality of the central state; nor is it sufficient to view the local state merely as a crisis manager.1 Because of the dynamic interaction between different levels of the Chinese state and the blurry line between policy making and implementation, we have also learned that the relationship between the central and local states can not be adequately portrayed as a dichotomy. Furthermore, the organization of the Chinese state compels us to recognize that a decentralized form of authoritarianism seems to have helped state power sustainability in the globalizing market economy. A growing number of studies on the
Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review – University of Hawai'I Press
Published: Jun 28, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.