Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Sáry, R. Vogels, G. Orban (1993)
Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons.Science, 260 5110
R. Gattass, A. Sousa, C. Gross (1988)
Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque, 8
P. Rousseeuw (1984)
Least Median of Squares RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 79
R. Heydt, Hong Zhou, H. Friedman (2000)
Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortexVision Research, 40
J. Hegdé, D. Essen (2000)
Selectivity for Complex Shapes in Primate Visual Area V2The Journal of Neuroscience, 20
K. Dobkins, T. Albright (1993)
What happens if it changes color when it moves?: Psychophysical experiments on the nature of chromatic input to motion detectorsVision Research, 33
Jaime Olavarria, E. DeYoe, J. Knierim, J. Fox, D. Essen (1992)
Neural responses to visual texture patterns in middle temporal area of the macaque monkey.Journal of neurophysiology, 68 1
G. Masson, C. Busettini, F. Miles (1997)
Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perceptionNature, 389
Owen Thomas, B. Cumming, A. Parker (2002)
A specialization for relative disparity in V2Nature Neuroscience, 5
D. Essen, S. Zeki (1978)
The topographic organization of rhesus monkey prestriate cortex.The Journal of Physiology, 277
G. Poggio (1979)
Mechanisms of stereopsis in monkey visual cortexTrends in Neurosciences, 2
Masayuki Watanabe, Hiroki Tanaka, T. Uka, I. Fujita (2002)
Disparity-selective neurons in area V4 of macaque monkeys.Journal of neurophysiology, 87 4
Carrie McAdams, J. Maunsell (1999)
Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4The Journal of Neuroscience, 19
Hiroki Tanaka, T. Uka, K. Yoshiyama, M. Kato, I. Fujita (1998)
Processing of shape defined by disparity in monkey inferior temporal cortexNeuroscience Research, 31
D. Hinkle, Charles Connor (2001)
Disparity tuning in macaque area V4Neuroreport, 12
J. Gentle, B. Manly (1990)
Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology.Biometrics, 48
S. Prince, B. Cumming, A. Parker (2002)
Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1.Journal of neurophysiology, 87 1
B. Cumming, A. Parker (1997)
Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perceptionNature, 389
F. Gonzalez, R. Perez (1998)
Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic visionProgress in Neurobiology, 55
A. Dean (2004)
The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortexExperimental Brain Research, 44
G. Stoner, T. Albright (1992)
Motion coherency rules are form-cue invariantVision Research, 32
J. Hegdé, D. Essen (2003)
Strategies of shape representation in macaque visual area V2Visual Neuroscience, 20
G. Stoner, T. Albright (1993)
Image Segmentation Cues in Motion Processing: Implications for Modularity in VisionJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5
Poggio Gf (1990)
Cortical neural mechanisms of stereopsis studied with dynamic random-dot stereograms.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 55
B. Cumming, G. DeAngelis (2001)
The physiology of stereopsis.Annual review of neuroscience, 24
G. Poggio, B. Motter, S. Squatrito, Y. Trotter (1985)
Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereogramsVision Research, 25
A. Parker, B. Cumming (2001)
Cortical mechanisms of binocular stereoscopic vision.Progress in brain research, 134
M. Taira, K. Tsutsui, Min Jiang, K. Yara, H. Sakata (2000)
Parietal neurons represent surface orientation from the gradient of binocular disparity.Journal of neurophysiology, 83 5
T. Albright (1992)
Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex.Science, 255 5048
Disparity tuning in visual cortex has been shown using a variety of stimulus types that contain stereoscopic depth cues. It is not known whether different stimuli yield similar disparity tuning curves. We studied whether cells in visual area V4 of the macaque show similar disparity tuning profiles when the same set of disparity values were tested using bars or dynamic random dot stereograms, which are among the most commonly used stimuli for this purpose. In a majority of V4 cells (61%), the shape of the disparity tuning profile differed significantly for the two stimulus types. The two sets of stimuli yielded statistically indistinguishable disparity tuning profiles for only a small minority (6%) of V4 cells. These results indicate that disparity tuning in V4 is stimulus-dependent. Given the fact that bar stimuli contain two-dimensional (2-D) shape cues, and the random dot stereograms do not, our results also indicate that V4 cells represent 2-D shape and binocular disparity in an interdependent fashion, revealing an unexpected complexity in the analysis of depth and three-dimensional shape. Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Van Essen, Dept. of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Box 8108, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110 (E-mail: vanessen@brainvis.wustl.edu )
Journal of Neurophysiology – The American Physiological Society
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.