Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Angela Didomenico, R. McGorry, Chien-Chi Chang (2007)
Association of subjective ratings of slipperiness to heel displacement following contact with the floor.Applied ergonomics, 38 5
Wen-Ruey Chang, K. Li, Yueng-hsiang Huang, Alfred Filiaggi, T. Courtney (2006)
Objective and subjective measurements of slipperiness in fast-food restaurants in the USA and their comparison with the previous results obtained in TaiwanSafety Science, 44
Wen-Ruey Chang, S. Matz (2001)
The slip resistance of common footwear materials measured with two slipmeters.Applied ergonomics, 32 6
A. Joh, K. Adolph, M. Campbell, Marion Eppler (2006)
Why walkers slip: Shine is not a reliable cue for slippery groundPerception & Psychophysics, 68
K. Li, Wen-Ruey Chang, T. Leamon, Chin Chen (2004)
Floor slipperiness measurement: friction coefficient, roughness of floors, and subjective perception under spillage conditionsSafety Science, 42
Brian Moyer, A. Chambers, M. Redfern, R. Cham (2006)
Gait parameters as predictors of slip severity in younger and older adultsErgonomics, 49
Sylvie Leclercq, S. Thouy, E. Rossignol (2007)
Progress in understanding processes underlying occupational accidents on the level based on case studiesErgonomics, 50
R. Cham, M. Redfern (2002)
Changes in gait when anticipating slippery floors.Gait & posture, 15 2
M. Redfern, R. Cham, K. Gielo-Perczak, R. Grönqvist, M. Hirvonen, H. Lanshammar, Mark Marpet, Clive Pai, Christopher Powers (2001)
Biomechanics of slipsErgonomics, 44
Eric Swensen, J. Purswell, R. Schlegel, R. Stanevich (1992)
Coefficient of Friction and Subjective Assessment of Slippery Work SurfacesHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34
D. Plaut, James McClelland, Mark Seidenberg, K. Patterson (1996)
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological review, 103 1
T. Bentley, Sophie Hide, D. Tappin, D. Moore, S. Legg, L. Ashby, R. Parker (2006)
Investigating risk factors for slips, trips and falls in New Zealand residential construction using incident-centred and incident-independent methodsErgonomics, 49
R. Grönqvist, M. Hirvonen, A. Tuusa (1993)
Slipperiness of the shoe-floor interface: comparison of objective and subjective assessments.Applied ergonomics, 24 4
A. Joh, K. Adolph, Priya Narayanan, V. Dietz (2007)
Gauging possibilities for action based on friction underfoot.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 33 5
Rohae Myung, James Smith, T. Leamon (1993)
Subjective assessment of floor slipperinessInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 11
J. Braun, Stephen Braun (1995)
Speculations about the value of glossColor Research and Application, 20
T. Lockhart, Jeremy Spaulding, Sung Park (2007)
Age-related slip avoidance strategy while walking over a known slippery floor surface.Gait & posture, 26 1
Wen-Ruey Chang (2002)
The effects of slip criterion and time on friction measurementsSafety Science, 40
T. Courtney, G. Sorock, D. Manning, J. Collins, M. Holbein-Jenny (2001)
Occupational slip, trip, and fall-related injuries can the contribution of slipperiness be isolated?Ergonomics, 44
H. Cohen, D. Cohen (1994)
Psychophysical assessment of the perceived slipperiness of floor tile surfaces in a laboratory settingJournal of Safety Research, 25
K. Adolph, Marion Eppler, L. Marin, I. Weise, Melissa Clearfield (2000)
Exploration in the service of prospective controlInfant Behavior & Development, 23
James Hanson, M. Redfern, Mainak Mazumdar (1999)
Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction.Ergonomics, 42 12
A. Chambers, S. Margerum, M. Redfern, R. Cham (2002)
Kinematics of the foot during slipsOccupational ergonomics, 3
If walkers can anticipate surface conditions, they can adjust their gait to help reduce the risk of a slip. This study investigated visual cues to slipperiness. Thirty-one participants made visually based judgements about 37 different floor surfaces. These judgements included ratings of slipperiness, reflectiveness, texture, traction, light/dark, likelihood of slipping, cautious intent as well as relative slipperiness. Correlational and regression analyses indicated that while reflectiveness is the predominant visual cue in forming judgements of slipperiness (r = 0.73; p < 0.05), texture and traction were also highly correlated with perceived slipperiness. Furthermore, participants were consistent in slipperiness judgements over time (r = 0.76; p < 0.05) and response measures and a significant relationship was observed between visual cues and coefficient of friction (COF) (r ranged from 0.16 to 0.58; all p < 0.05). Subjective ratings and measured COF, taken as a composite measure of slipperiness, may provide safety professionals with an improved indicator of ‘higher risk’ surface conditions. The results indicate that people rely on visual cues to judge slipperiness, that they do so consistently and that subjective ratings are related to measured COF. These results have implications for the measurement of slipperiness as well as the design of floor surfaces to be protective against slips and falls.
Ergonomics – Taylor & Francis
Published: Dec 1, 2008
Keywords: perceived slipperiness; visual cues; coefficient of friction; slips
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.