Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Rebrin, U. Fischer, T. Woedtke, P. Abel, E. Brunstein (1989)
Automated feedback control of subcutaneous glucose concentration in diabetic dogsDiabetologia, 32
M. Koudelka, F. Rohner-Jeanrenaud, J. Terrettaz, Elisabetta Bobbioni-Harsch, N. Rooij, Bernard Jeanrenaud (1991)
In-vivo behaviour of hypodermically implanted microfabricated glucose sensors.Biosensors & bioelectronics, 6 1
J. Pickup, G. Shaw, D. Claremont (1989)
In vivo molecular sensing in diabetes mellitus: an implantable glucose sensor with direct electron transferDiabetologia, 32
D. Matthews, E. Bown, T. Beck, E. Plotkin, L. Lock, E. Gosden, M. Wickham (1988)
An Amperometric Needle‐type Glucose Sensor Tested in Rats and ManDiabetic Medicine, 5
D. Bindra, Y. Zhang, G. Wilson, R. Sternberg, D. Thévenot, D. Moatti, G. Reach (1991)
Design and in vitro studies of a needle-type glucose sensor for subcutaneous monitoring.Analytical chemistry, 63 17
J. Pickup (1985)
BIOSENSORS: A CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE J. C. PICKUPThe Lancet, 326
U. Fischer, R. Ertle, P. Abel, K. Rebrin, E. Brunstein, H. Dorsche, E. Freyse (1987)
Assessment of subcutaneous glucose concentration: validation of the wick technique as a reference for implanted electrochemical sensors in normal and diabetic dogsDiabetologia, 30
W. Clarke, D. Cox, L. Gonder-Frederick, W. Carter, S. Pohl (1987)
Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood GlucoseDiabetes Care, 10
M. Shichiri, Y. Yamasaki, R. Kawamori, N. Hakui, H. Abe (1982)
WEARABLE ARTIFICIAL ENDOCRINE PANCREAS WITH NEEDLE-TYPE GLUCOSE SENSORThe Lancet, 320
P. Abel, A. Müller, U. Fischer (1984)
Experience with an implantable glucose sensor as a prerequisite of an artificial beta cell.Biomedica biochimica acta, 43 5
G. Velho, P. Froguel, D. Thévenot, G. Reach (1989)
Strategies for calibrating a subcutaneous glucose sensor.Biomedica biochimica acta, 48 11-12
D. Claremont, E. Sambrook, C. Pentón, J. Pickup (1986)
Subcutaneous implantation of a ferrocene-mediated glucose sensor in pigsDiabetologia, 29
M. Shichiri, R. Kawamori, Y. Goriya, Y. Yamasaki, M. Nomura, N. Hakui, H. Abe (1983)
Glycaemic control in pancreatectomized dogs with a wearable artificial endocrine pancreasDiabetologia, 24
J. Armour, J. Lucisano, B. Mckean, D. Gough (1990)
Application of Chronic Intravascular Blood Glucose Sensor in DogsDiabetes, 39
125 35 35 3 3 D. Moatti-Sirat F. Capron V. Poitout G. Reach D. S. Bindra Y. Zhang G. S. Wilson D. R. Thévenot Service de Diabétologie INSERM U 341 Hôtel-Dieu Paris LABAM University Paris Val de Marne Créteil France Department of Chemistry University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA Summary A miniaturized amperometric, enzymatic, glucose sensor (outer diameter 0.45 mm) was evaluated after implantation in the subcutaneous tissue of normal rats. A simple experimental procedure was designed for the long-term assessment of the sensor's function which was performed by recording the current during an intraperitoneal glucose load. The sensor was calibrated by accounting for the increase in the current during the concomitant increase in plasma glucose concentration, determined in blood sampled at the tail vein. This made it possible to estimate the glucose concentration in subcutaneous tissue. During the glucose load, the change in subcutaneous glucose concentration followed that in blood with a lag time consistently shorter than 5 min. The estimations of subcutaneous glucose concentration during these tests were compared to the concomitant plasma glucose concentrations by using a grid analysis. Three days after implantation ( n =6 experiments), 79 estimations were considered accurate, except for five which were in the acceptable zone. Ten days after implantation ( n =5 experiments), 101 estimations were accurate, except for one value, which was still acceptable. The sensitivity was around 0.5 nA mmol −1 ·l −1 on day 3 and day 10. A longitudinal study on seven sensors tested on different days demonstrated a relative stability of the sensor's sensitivity. Finally, histological examination of the zone around the implantation site revealed a fibrotic reaction containing neocapillaries, which could explain the fast response of the sensor to glucose observed in vivo, even on day 10. We conclude that this miniaturized glucose sensor, whose size makes it easily implanted, works for at least ten days after implantation into rat subcutaneous tissue.
Diabetologia – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.