Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Boyle, D. Stimart (1983)
Developmental Responses of Zinnia to PhotoperiodJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
H. Jain, S. Gupta (1960)
Genetic nature of self-incompatibility in annual chrysanthemumExperientia, 16
(1968)
Pollen tube growth
(1986)
Gene expression in Zinnia angustifolia HBK, Z. elegans Jacq. and their interspecific hybrids
D. Nettancourt (1977)
Incompatibility in angiospermsSexual Plant Reproduction, 10
W. Ronald, P. Ascher (2004)
Self compatibility in garden Chrysanthemum: occurrence, inheritance and breeding potentialTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 46
(1976)
Self-incompatibility systems in floricultural
A. Torres (1964)
HYBRIDIZATION STUDIES IN PERENNIAL ZINNIASAmerican Journal of Botany, 51
R. Knox (1984)
Pollen-Pistil Interactions
(1957)
Parasterilit ~ it bei Sonnenblumen
B. Howlett, R. Knox, J. Paxton, J. Heslop-Harrison (1975)
Pollen-wall proteins: physicochemical characterization and role in self-incompatibility in Cosmos bipinnatusProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 188
C. Kerhoas, R. Knox, C. Dumas (1983)
Specificity of the Callose Response in Stigmas of BrassicaAnnals of Botany, 52
A. Torres (1962)
CYTOTAXONOMY OF CESPITOSE ZINNIASAmerican Journal of Botany, 49
L. Stephens, P. Ascher, R. Widmer (1982)
Genetics of self incompatibility in diploid Ageratum houstonianum millTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 63
R. Knox (1973)
Pollen wall proteins: pollen-stigma interactions in ragweed and Cosmos (Compositae).Journal of cell science, 12 2
A. Eenink (1981)
Compatibility and incompatibility in witloof-chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). 2. The incompatibility systemEuphytica, 30
(1983)
Stimart DP (1983) Developmental responses
D. Nettancourt (1977)
Incompatibility in Angiosperms
P. Ascher (1976)
SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEMS IN FLORICULTURE CROPS
T. Boyle, D. Stimart (1982)
Interspecific hybrids of Zinnia elegans Jacq. and Z. angustifolia HBK: embryology, morphology and powdery mildew resistanceEuphytica, 31
D. Gerstel, M. Riner (1950)
Self-incompatibility studies in guayule; pollen-tube behavior.The Journal of heredity, 41 2
J. Brewer (1974)
Incompatibility relationship in pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium vis.)Euphytica, 23
J. Zagorski, P. Ascher, R. Widmer (1983)
Multigenic self incompatibility in hexaploid ChrysanthemumEuphytica, 32
(1950)
Self-incompatibility in Crepis foetida (L.) subsp, rhoedifolia (Bieb.) Schinz
(1973)
The callose rejection reaction: a new bioassay for incompatibility in Cruciferae and Compositae
(1985)
Factors affecting expression of ray floret color in Zinnia elegans, Z. angustifolia and their interspecific hybrids
N. Hogenboom (1975)
Incompatibility and incongruity: two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationshipsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 188
D. Gerstel (1950)
Self-incompatibility studies in guayule; inheritance.Genetics, 35 4
P. Ascher, S. Peloquin (1968)
POLLEN TUBE GROWTH AND INCOMPATIBILITY FOLLOWING INTRA‐ AND INTER‐SPECIFIC POLLINATIONS IN LILIUM LONGIFLORUMAmerican Journal of Botany, 55
(1950)
Self-incompatibility studies in guayule
D. Valentine, G. Stebbins (1951)
Variation and Evolution in Plants
C. Dumas, R. Knox (1983)
Callose and determination of pistil viability and incompatibilityTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 67
Professor Frankel, Professor Galun (1977)
Pollination Mechanisms, Reproduction and Plant Breeding
M. Hughes, E. Babcock (1950)
Self-Incompatibility in Crepis Foetida (L.) Subsp. Rhoeadifolia (Bieb.) Schinz Et KellerGenetics, 35
B. Imrie, P. Knowles (1971)
Genetic Studies of Self-Incompatibility in Carthamus flavescens Spreng 1Crop Science, 11
(1939)
The inheritance of some flower and plant characters in Zinnia
(1971)
Pollen - pistil interactions in Lilium
O. Olorode (2008)
The evolutionary implications of interspecific hybridization among four species of zinnia sect. Mendezia (compositae)Brittonia, 22
(1972)
Statistical methods in agricultural research
Y. Kho, J. Baër (1973)
Improving the cross rhododendron impeditum × rhododendron ‘Elizabeth’ by temperature treatmentEuphytica, 22
W. Rosen (1971)
Pistil–Pollen Interactions in Lilium
(1971)
Pollen-pistil interactions in Lilium. In: Heslop-Harrison J (ed) Pollen: development and physiology
J. Jong, Y. Kho (1982)
The shriveling of pollinated pistils as an aid to rapid determination of Chrysanthemum pollen viabilityEuphytica, 31
L. Crowe (1954)
Incompatibility in Cosmos bipinnatusHeredity, 8
D. Sampson (1962)
INTERGENERIC POLLEN-STIGMA INCOMPATIBILITY IN THE CRUCIFERAECanadian journal of genetics and cytology, 4
F. Martin (1959)
Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence.Stain technology, 34 3
(1982)
Interspecific hybrids of Z . e / egans Jacq . and Z . angustifolia HBK : embryology , morphology and powdery mildew resistance
Vithanage H.I.M.V., R. Knox (1977)
Development and cytochemistry of stigma surface and response to self and foreign pollination in Helianthus annuus [sunflower].Phytomorphology
(1981)
Compatibility and incompatibility in witloof-chicory (Chicorium intybus L.)
D. Lewis, L. Crowe (1958)
Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plantsHeredity, 12
122 73 73 2 2 T. H. Boyle D. P. Stimart Department of Horticulture University of Maryland 20742 College Park MD USA Department of Plant and Soil Sciences French Hall, University of Massachusetts 01003 Amherst MA USA Summary Intraspecific and reciprocal interspecific crosses involving Zinnia angustifolia clones and Z. elegans lines showed that in both species, sporophytic self-incompatibility (SI) systems were present. Intensity of SI varied among clones and lines, and high self seed set was associated with a concomitant decrease in callose fluorescence in papillae and pollen tubes. Incomplete stigmatic inhibition of pollen germination and tube growth was observed in reciprocal interspecific crosses and associated with callose synthesis, suggesting S-gene activity. Seed set and progeny obtained following Z. angustifolia × Z. elegans matings was comparable to intraspecific compatible matings of Z. angustifolia although the rate of pollen tube growth through the style was slower. In Z. elegans × Z. angustifolia matings, additional prezygotic barriers were present and acted between pollen tube penetration of the stigma and syngamy. SI X SI interspecific incompatibility was essentially unilateral, with no embryos or progeny obtained when Z. elegans was the pistillate parent. It was hypothesized that nonfunctioning of Z. elegans × Z. angustifolia crosses was due to S-gene expression at the stigmatic surface and to other isolating mechanisms in the stylar or ovarian transmitting tissue.
TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 1986
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.