Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Roy Pitkin, M. Branagan (1998)
Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial.JAMA, 280 3
R. Cook, D. Sackett (1995)
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effectBMJ, 310
M. Bobbio, B. Demichelis, G. Giustetto (1994)
Completeness of reporting trial results: effect on physicians' willingness to prescribeThe Lancet, 343
Pitkin Rm (1987)
The importance of the abstract.Obstetrics & Gynecology, 70
H. Bucher, M. Weinbacher, K. Gyr (1994)
Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentrationBMJ, 309
R. Pitkin, M. Branagan, L. Burmeister (1999)
Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles.JAMA, 281 12
M. Gardner, D. Altman (1986)
Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.British Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), 292
R. Leblond (1989)
Improving structured abstracts.Annals of internal medicine, 111 9
D. Sackett, R. Cook (1994)
Understanding clinical trialsBMJ, 309
G. Guyatt, Roman Jaeschke, N. Heddle, Deborah Cook, Harry Shannon, Stephen Walter (1995)
Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 152 2
A. Feinstein (1998)
P-values and confidence intervals: two sides of the same unsatisfactory coin.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 51 4
R. Simon (1986)
Confidence intervals for reporting results of clinical trials.Annals of internal medicine, 105 3
RB Haynes, KA McKibbon, CJ Walker, N Ryan, D Fitzgerald, MF Ramsden (1990)
A study of the use and usefulness of online access to MEDLINE in clinical settingsAnn Intern Med, 112
RB Haynes, CD Mulrow, EJ Huth, DG Altman, MJ Gardner (1990)
More informative abstracts revisitedAnn Intern Med, 113
L. Forrow, W. Taylor, R. Arnold (1992)
Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions.The American journal of medicine, 92 2
J. Dowie (1998)
The ‘Number Needed to Treat’ and the ‘Adjusted NNT’ in Health Care Decision-MakingJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 3
MD Naylor, MB Chen, MSc Strauss (1992)
Measured Enthusiasm: Does the Method of Reporting Trial Results Alter Perceptions of Therapeutic Effectiveness?Annals of Internal Medicine, 117
DL Sackett, RJ Cook (1994)
Understanding clinical trials: what measures of efficacy should journal articles provide busy clinicians?BMJ, 309
R. Haynes, D. Altman, C. Mulrow, M. Gardner, E. Huth (1991)
More Informative Abstracts RevisitedRegional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 16
Marshall Kg (1996)
Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 1. Influence of reporting methods on perception of benefitsCanadian Medical Association Journal, 154
(1987)
A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articlesAnn Intern Med, 106
Hux Je, Naylor Cd (1995)
In the Eye of the BeholderJAMA Internal Medicine, 155
JE Hux, CD Naylor (1995)
In the eye of the beholderArch Intern Med, 155
D. Malenka, J. Baron, S. Johansen, Jon Wahrenberger, J. Ross (1993)
The framing effect of relative and absolute riskJournal of General Internal Medicine, 8
M. Borenstein (1994)
The case for confidence intervals in controlled clinical trials.Controlled clinical trials, 15 5
W. Spitzer (1991)
The structured sonnetJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44
D. Altman, M. Gardner (1987)
More informative abstracts.Annals of internal medicine, 107 5
R. Haynes, K. McKibbon, C. Walker, N. Ryan, D. Fitzgerald, Michael Ramsden (1990)
Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness.Annals of internal medicine, 112 1
RF LeBlond (1989)
Improving structured abstracts (Letter)Ann Intern Med, 111
F. Gutzwiller, F. Paccaud (1987)
A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.Annals of internal medicine, 106 4
OBJECTIVE: The reporting of relative risk reductions (RRRs) or absolute risk reductions (ARRs) to quantify binary outcomes in trials engenders differing perceptions of therapeutic efficacy, and the merits of P values versus confidence intervals (CIs) are also controversial. We describe the manner in which numerical and statistical difference in treatment outcomes is presented in published abstracts.
Journal of General Internal Medicine – Springer Journals
Published: May 18, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.