Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Mckeown (1970)
MechanicsJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 63
D. Bohm (1952)
A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. IIPhysical Review
A. Davydov, D. Haar (1965)
Quantum Mechanics Vol. 1
A. French, Lyle Roelofs (1971)
Vibrations and Waves
P. Suppes (2001)
Representation and invariance of scientific structures, 130
P. Suppes, J. Barros (1994)
Diffraction with well-defined photon trajectories: A foundational analysisFoundations of Physics Letters, 7
P. Suppes, J.A. Barros, A.S. Sant’Anna (1996)
Violation of Bell’s inequalities with local photonsFoundations of Physics Letters, 9
V. Braginsky, F.Ya. Khalili (1992)
Quantum measurement
H. Goldstein (1980)
Classical mechanics
(1971)
singularity problem in quantum cosmology
P. Suppes, J. Barros, A. Sant’Anna (1996)
Violation of bell's inequalities with a local theory of photonsFoundations of Physics Letters, 9
Photon interference with well defined trajectories
P. Suppes, A. Sant’Anna, J. Barros (1995)
A particle theory of the Casimir effectFoundations of Physics Letters, 9
J. Barros, N. Pinto-Neto (1996)
The causal interpretation of quantum mechanics and the singularity problem in quantum cosmologyarXiv: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, 57
P. Suppes, J. Barros (1994)
A random-walk approach to interferenceInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics, 33
(1977)
Quantum mechanics (Vol
P. Knight (1994)
The Quantum Theory of MotionJournal of Modern Optics, 41
H. Allen (1928)
The Quantum TheoryNature, 122
H. Corben, P. Stehle, N. Chako (1961)
Classical Mechanics (2nd ed.)Physics Today, 14
(1988)
Processus d’Interaction entre photons et atoms. Paris: InterEditions
(1988)
Processus d'Interaction entre photons et atoms
(1996)
A pure particle theory of the casimir effect
B. Diu, C. cohen-tannoudji, F. Laloe (2020)
Quantum Mechanics:Fundamentals of Physics II
V. Braginsky, F. Khalili, KIP Thorne (1992)
Quantum Measurement: Nonclassical states of electromagnetic waves as tools for quantum measurements
S. Epstein (1953)
The Causal Interpretation of Quantum MechanicsPhysical Review, 91
In this paper we study in details a system of two weakly coupled harmonic oscillators from the point of view of Bohm’s interpretation of quantum mechanics. This system may be viewed as a simple model for the interaction between a photon and a photodetector. We obtain exact solutions for the general case. We then compute approximate solutions for the case where one oscillator is initially in its first excited state (a single photon) reaching the other oscillator in its ground state (the photodetector). The approximate solutions represent the state of both oscillators after the interaction, which is not an eigenstate of the individual hamiltonians for each oscillator, and therefore the energies for each oscillator do not exist in the Copenhagen interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. We use the approximate solutions that we obtained to compute Bohmian trajectories and to study the energy transfer between the oscillators. We conclude that, even using the Bohmian view, the energy of each individual oscillator is not well defined, as the nonlocal quantum potential is not negligible even after the coupling is turned off.
Synthese – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 9, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.